Graphic: Central Bank Fears Decades of Negative Real Rates

The Bank of England’s chief economist has painted a dark picture of the UK economy for decades.

Real interest rates in the UK are forecast to remain negative for 40 years, according to analysis by Andy Haldane, the Bank of England’s (BoE) chief economist.

In a speech yesterday Haldane said the UK’s economy “appears to be writhing in both agony and ecstasy”: While economic growth is improving, inflation is low, and employment is rising, at the same time real wages are falling, productivity is stagnant productivity, and real interest rates are near zero.

Haldane said that “five-year real interest rates expected in five years’ time have fallen by over 100 basis points” in the UK, the Eurozone, and the US. This was likely caused by repeated “downside surprises” as expected recoveries in certain data measurements failed to materialise.

This had resulted in “truly extraordinary” forecasts, he said—as illustrated by the chart below.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Haldane said the BoE’s rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee “has been forecasting sunshine tomorrow in every year since 2008”, with real wages, productivity, and real interest rates all expected to rise but with few (if any) increases materialising. The International Monetary Fund also repeatedly overshot in its predictions, he added.

Haldane ratesSource: Bank of EnglandThe UK’s base interest rate has been 0.5% for more than five years, while the US Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank have also kept rates at record low levels for similar periods. As the Fed reduces its quantitative easing programme, expected to end this month, investor attention has turned to when central banks will begin tightening monetary policy by raising rates—and by how much.

Haldane said the 40-year negative rate forecast may reflect a shift towards safe haven assets by investors spooked by recent geo-political tensions.

“The implications for future growth might then be relatively benign, either because these risks are short-lived or because they do not affect companies’ investment plans,” he said. “In other words, the pattern of real rates might still be consistent with a recovery.”

However, he also warned of “an alternative hypothesis” that the forecasts “reflect pessimistic expectations about future growth prospects”, which would require base rates to remain lower for much longer than is expected by any central bank analyst.

“This would carry more far-reaching and negative implications for the economy, more in line with the secular stagnation hypothesis,” Haldane said. Rising inequality, falling educational standards, rising debt, and high youth unemployment all play into this hypothesis, he added.

“Recent evidence, in the UK and globally, has shifted my probability distribution towards the lower tail. Put in rather plainer English, I am gloomier,” Haldane said. “That reflects the mark-down in global growth, heightened geo-political and financial risks and the weak pipeline of inflationary pressures from wages internally and commodity prices externally. Taken together, this implies interest rates could remain lower for longer, certainly than I had expected three months ago, without endangering the [BoE’s 2%] inflation target.”

Related Content:LGIM: Central Banks Are Wrong on Inflation

The High School Breakup

Bill Gross and PIMCO's breakup has been one of the ugliest in the industry. What are the ramifications?

We all did it, and we all had it done to us: dump someone—and deny that we did it because they were soon going to dump us.

Bill Gross and the company he founded, PIMCO, pulled the asset management equivalent of this on Friday, September 26. Shortly before 9:00 AM EDT, the news hit the wires: Bill Gross was leaving for Janus. Mass incredulity followed. Was this a joke? Had someone hacked a prominent Twitter feed, hoping to arbitrage the “news”? As it turned out, it wasn’t a hoax—it was the beginning of what will be remembered as one of the ugliest breakups in asset management history.

cio1014sh2

(Art by JooHee Yoon)

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Within minutes of the news breaking, the spin began. Everyone seemed to have a source within PIMCO, and all these sources seemed to be saying the same thing: Gross jumped before he could be pushed, and the pushing was to be done later that afternoon. This was, to this industry observer’s eyes, a harkening back to much earlier years. “Yeah, she broke up with me at lunch—but only because she knew I was going to break up with her at dinner.”

Of course, unlike teenage breakups, this one had major ramifications for certain shareholders. On the announcement of the news, Janus’ stock soared upward of 40%, creating $800 million in value. PIMCO parent company Allianz correspondingly saw its shares fall more than 5%—a drop that destroyed nearly $5 billion in value. The price of treasuries, a large amount of which PIMCO’s Total Return Fund holds, also fluctuated wildly. And only time will tell what market flows will do: Commentators expect PIMCO to suffer, and Janus to benefit, as money follows Gross out the door.

If only all high school-style breakups were so interesting.

«