FTSE 100 Pension Liabilities Increase by £95 Billion

Report shows that pension closures continue at the UK’s largest companies.

The total cost of pension liabilities at FTSE 100-listed companies grew £95 billion to £681 billion for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, despite many firms barring new employees from defined benefit (DB) plans, and increasing funding by more than £4 billion, according to research by pension and benefits consultancy JLT Employee Benefits.

JLT’s research found that 10 FTSE 100 companies have total pension liabilities greater than their equity market value, and some are even worse off. For example, International Airlines Group, the holding company of British Airways, has pension liabilities that are three times its equity market value of £8 billion, and aerospace and defense company BAE Systems’ total disclosed pension liabilities are almost double its £18.6 billion equity market value. Additionally, 16 companies have pension liabilities of more than £10 billion, the largest of which is Royal Dutch Shell, with £73 billion in liabilities.

“Times and markets are still very difficult for many companies,” said Charles Cowling, director, JLT Employee Benefits.This report shows that the trend of DB closures continues at the UK’s largest companies, and we expect that defined benefit pension schemes will have all but disappeared from the private sector within the next year or so.”

According to the report, changes in economic conditions, increasing life expectancy, and aggressive pension regulations have contributed to the sharp increase in pension liabilities over the past few years. JLT says that many companies are reacting to rising liabilities by closing pension plans to future and even current employees.

“However, this is having little to no impact on reducing liabilities,” said JLT. “After allowing for the impact of changes in assumptions and market conditions, JLT estimates that ongoing DB pension provision fell approximately 12% in 2016.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The report found that only 53 FTSE 100 companies are still providing more than a handful of current employees with defined benefit plans, while only 21 of the FTSE 100 are still providing DB benefits to a significant number of employees (defined as incurring ongoing DB service cost of more than 5% of total payroll).

In 2016, £17.6 billion was contributed to FTSE 100 pension plans, up from £13.3 billion in the previous year, according to JLT, which also said that the total deficit in FTSE 100 pension plans at the end of 2016 was an estimated £87 billion.

Only 24 FTSE 100 companies disclosed a pension surplus in their most recent annual report and accounts, according to the report, while 66 companies disclosed pension deficits. The company with the best funding position, according to JLT, is postal services provider Royal Mail, which reported a 93% surplus, while the worst-funded pension plan is tourism company TUI, which is running a 35% deficit.

JLT said that the rise in liabilities continues despite an increase in pension fund contributions from FTSE 100 companies. In 2016, there was total deficit funding of £11 billion, up from £6 billion the previous year, and more than half of the FTSE 100 companies reported significant deficit funding contributions in their most recent annual report and accounts.

Tags: , , , ,

Dutch Pensions Continue to Dwindle from Consolidation

The number of plans in the Netherlands has plunged 75% in 20 years.

The consolidation trend in the Netherlands’ pension sector is causing the number of Dutch pensions to dwindle from more than 1,000 20 years ago to just 268 today, according to De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), the central bank of the Netherlands.

 DNB said the steady decline brought the number of pension plans in the country from 1,060 in 1997, to 713 in 2007, to 268 in 2017. And that number could fall below 200 next year, as another 45 pension funds have already notified the central bank that they plan to liquidate. 

The sharp decline mostly involves company pension funds, which have fallen by approximately 70% over the past 10 years to 192 as of June 30, from 605 at the end of 2007. Meanwhile, over the same time period, the number of industry-wide pension funds fell by about 40%, to 59 from 96.

The bank said that pension funds that do not continue independently can decide to transfer their accumulated assets and liabilities to another pension provider, or to merge with another pension fund. Other pension providers include pension funds, general pension funds, premium pension institutions, insurers, and foreign pension institutions.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Industry-wide pension funds and general pension funds in particular took over the entitlements from pension funds that ceased operations, according to DNB. Before the introduction of the general pension fund vehicle, most accrued benefit transfers from liquidating and merging pension funds were to insurers and industry-wide pension funds.

The bank also said that the decision by pension funds to liquidate or merge are mostly driven by a host of multiple converging trends. These include the rising cost of pension administration, increased tightening of statutory requirements, difficulty finding suitable board members, the fund’s financial position or demographic composition, and developments at the employer, such as mergers, company failures, or pension adjustments. Many pensions also decided that consolidation could also help to achieve economies of scale.  

 “We expect pension funds to consider their sustainability and develop a vision and strategy for the future,” said DNB. “The fact that the future of the sector is as yet unclear emphasizes the importance for pension funds to have a vision and strategy in place, and to be able to anticipate changes to the system.”

The bank said that earlier this year, it identified a group of 22 pension funds as highly vulnerable.

“We have requested these pension funds to draw up a plan for the future, indicating if and how they intend to address their vulnerabilities or how they intend to resolve their activities in an orderly fashion.”


Tags: , , ,

«