Home > News > Regulation > Former CIO Charged With Overvaluing Funds by $1 Billion
Regulation

Former CIO Charged With Overvaluing Funds by $1 Billion

Infinity Q Capital Management’s James Velissaris allegedly pocketed nearly $27 million in ill-gotten fees
By Michael Katz

CIO-031522-Former CIO Charged with Overvaluing Funds by $1 Billion-1346656333-web

The former chief investment officer and founder of investment adviser Infinity Q Capital Management faces a slew of criminal and civil charges for allegedly overvaluing the assets of funds he ran by more than $1 billion while raking in nearly $27 million in ill-gotten fees.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have accused James Velissaris of altering inputs and manipulating the code of a third-party pricing service used to value the funds’ assets.

According to an unsealed six-count indictment and other court documents, Velissaris told investors and others for four years that certain holdings of the Infinity Q funds were valued by an independent third-party pricing service. However, the agencies say this was false and accuse Velissaris of manipulating the valuation models from the pricing service and altering inputs to hide the poor performance of the firm’s funds.

“Unbeknownst to investors, Velissaris knowingly inflated the Infinity Q Funds’ stated valuations in at least four ways,” the SEC said in its complaint. “Velissaris manipulated computer code in the pricing service’s valuation models; entered inputs he knew were incorrect into the pricing service; selected certain valuation models in the pricing service that he knew could not properly value the relevant positions; and knowingly cherry-picked one of the key valuation inputs.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The SEC said Velissaris’ manipulations were so rampant that he couldn’t even keep up with his own deceptions. The regulator alleges that there were times when Velissaris had different valuations in the firm’s mutual fund and the private fund for the same position, and that he also had the mutual fund report positions at “mathematically impossible valuations.” The SEC also alleges Velissaris was aware that the Infinity Q Funds’ counterparties were valuing the same positions at “massively different amounts.”

According to the charges, when the COVID-19 pandemic sent markets into a tailspin in March 2020, Velissaris knew his funds were not well positioned for turmoil and were at risk of failing.

“To try to stave off the Infinity Q Funds’ failure, Velissaris stepped up his manipulation of the valuations of positions held by the Infinity Q Funds, resulting in the overvaluation of each of the funds’ net assets by hundreds of millions of dollars,” the SEC’s complaint stated. “This overvaluation attracted hundreds of millions of dollars in additional investments and forestalled investor redemptions, all while some funds with similar investment strategies struggled or failed.”

The SEC has also accused Velissaris of trying to obstruct the regulator’s staff during its investigation. It said he produced altered compliance manuals and private placement memoranda that differed from what had been sent to investors in order to cover up inconsistencies within the firm’s practices. Velissaris also allegedly drafted and backdated valuation committee minutes for meetings that never happened and then produced them to the SEC.

The SEC has charged Velissaris with violating antifraud and other provisions of the federal securities laws, and is seeking permanent injunctive relief, return of allegedly ill-gotten gains, and civil penalties. The SEC is also seeking to bar Velissaris from serving as a public company officer and director. The CFTC is looking for restitution to defrauded pool participants, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, permanent registration and trading bans, and permanent injunctions against further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations.

The charges of securities fraud, wire fraud, lying to auditors, and obstruction of justice against Velissaris each carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, while the charges of investment adviser fraud and conspiracy to obstruct justice each carry a maximum sentence of five years in prison.  

Related Stories:

SEC Charges Adviser With Fraudulently Operating Private Fund

Real Estate PE Firm Founder Sentenced to 5 Years for Fraud

Twitter to Pay $809.5 Million to Settle Securities Fraud Lawsuit

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Home > News > Risk > How Escalating Inflation Can Produce a Recession
Risk

How Escalating Inflation Can Produce a Recession

Natixis’ Lavorgna sketches out how higher prices shrinks consumers’ income—and imperil the economy.

By Larry Light


As Federal Reserve policymakers gather this week, apparently intent on raising interest rates to fight spiraling inflation, while war shakes eastern Europe and other possible calamities lurk, talk of recession has appeared on Wall Street.

Of all the malign factors that could propel the U.S. into an economic downturn, inflation is the most threatening, in the estimation of Joseph Lavorgna, Natixis’ chief economist, Americas.

Even if the Ukraine war is resolved, March and April inflation rates are likely to keep swelling, he argues in a research note. He worries that the Fed will tighten too much and shrink gross domestic product. “This is why today’s high inflation rate, which is poised to go higher, and a hawkish Fed are such a concern,” he writes.

Lavorgna fears that the Consumer Price Index, which jumped to a 40-year high of 7.9% in February, will “increase to a staggering 8.5%” in March, and perhaps keep rising. The 7.9% CPI figure was reached before this month’s sharp run up in energy and other commodities, he points out.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Nondiscretionary spending—for the likes of food, energy, and shelter—has risen to 24% of household income, from 20% a year ago. Lavorgna warns that if nondiscretionary outlays climb to 28%, the result would be bad.

This would be the equivalent of a $750 billion tax increase, he calculates. Should that occur, he observes, “How could the economy possiblyavoid a downturn?”

The price boosts are across the board, the most recent CPI reading shows, and Lavorgna remarks that unlike “in the past, food is rising alongside energy.”

“Will this make the Fed more aggressive at a time when the economy is already markedly slowing?” he asks.

The Federal Reserve’s policymaking panel on Wednesday is expected to announce a quarter percentage point boost in its benchmark federal funds rate, which calls the tune for short-term interest rates. This elevation from today’s near-zero level, in place since the pandemic’s onset, is the first in a series of hikes that the central bank is poised to roll out, in a bid to combat the higher inflation.

Meanwhile, projections for GDP are shrinking. The Atlanta Fed’s GDP Now estimate for this year’s first quarter showed an almost 2% annual growth a month ago. Now it is 0.5%. Other forecasters are more sanguine. Morgan Stanley, for instance, thinks that the current quarter will show a 2.9% expansion. Compare that with 2021’s economic growth, a robust 5.7%.

Related Stories:

Will the Federal Reserve Go Too Far?

How Low Can You Go? Strategists Compete for Lowest 2022 GDP Growth

High Inflation Leads to Expensive Cost-of-Living Adjustments for CalPERS and Others

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

«