Fed Aims to Start Slowing Its Bond Reduction Drive ‘Fairly Soon’

Shrinking the central bank’s balance sheet has been ongoing for two years.


Large questions about the pace of inflation’s decline and the timing of interest rate cuts claimed most Wall Street attention about the Federal Reserve’s meeting this week. But equally significant was the news about decreasing the Fed’s bond holdings.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell announced at the body’s Wednesday news briefing that policymakers would slow the balance sheet’s two-year reduction drive “fairly soon.” A slowdown in the reduction would ease one source of upward pressure on interest rates—which would benefit borrowers and the banking system.

Powell cautioned that a total end to the bond “runoff”—allowing a segment of bonds to mature and not re-investing the proceeds in new bonds—was not imminent, just that its slower pace would be easier for the financial system to get used to.

The stock market greeted word of the Fed’s announcements by jumping about 1% on the three major U.S. market indexes.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The Fed began enlarging its balance sheet in June 2020, around the time it started lowering the fed funds rate. Buying Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities from public markets, the central bank injected cash into the economy to counteract the pandemic’s financial toll, thus helping keep rates low, a process called quantitative easing or QE. The Fed’s balance sheet doubled to $9 trillion by 2022.

Higher inflation prompted the Fed to reverse course. In mid-2022, as the Fed commenced to raise rates, it also pulled back on re-investing the principal of matured Treasurys and MBS, a policy called quantitative tightening. Since then, the Fed’s balance sheet has slimmed down by around $1.4 trillion, to $7.6 trillion.

At his briefing, Powell would not pinpoint any certain time the Fed would slow its runoff pace, saying “the words fairly soon mean fairly soon.” Letting the balance sheet shed bonds has involved running off $95 billion in Treasurys and $35 billion in agency mortgage-backed securities.

Powell argued that “inflation is still too high,” but added that the Consumer Price Index and the Fed’s favorite gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, have continued downward despite some “bumps in the road,” namely slightly higher readings in January and February than in previous months. On Wednesday, the Fed kept its benchmark short-term rate, the fed funds rate, stable at a range of 5.25% to 5.5%; the central bank has held it at that level since the last hike in July 2023.

The Fed’s target rate for inflation is 2.0% annually, and the its policymaking committee indicated in the economics projections released Wednesday that inflation would not get there until 2026. The panel also estimated that the U.S. gross domestic product would rise 2.1% in 2024 and 2.0% in each of the ensuing years. (GDP increased 3.1% in 2023.) The projections remained for the central bank to cut the fed funds rate three times this year.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

House Republicans Propose 13 Bills to Reform SEC

The legislation would require more economic analysis and longer comment periods.



The U.S. House Committee on Financial Services’ Subcommittee on Capital Markets held a hearing on Wednesday to discuss 13 bills proposed to address what the subcommittee’s Republican members have described as “SEC overreach.”

The bills reflect the concerns long expressed by committee Republicans and trade groups.

Representative Anne Wagner, R-Missouri, who chairs the subcommittee, called the Securities and Exchange Commission’s approach to regulation “aggressive and burdensome,” and she expressed concern about an “alarming absence of stakeholder input and meaningful cost-benefit analysis during the rulemaking process.”

Wagner also criticized as too speedy the SEC’s rulemaking process, questioning why comment periods on proposed rules have been as short as 30 days. A discussion draft of one of the bills circulating in the subcommittee would require the SEC to have comment periods of at least 60 days, excluding federal holidays, for rule proposals. Under current law, comment periods must be open for at least 30 days, inclusive of holidays.

In remarks at the hearing, Wagner also criticized the SEC for issuing its recent climate disclosure rule earlier this month.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“As members of this committee have made clear: The SEC is not an environmental regulator, nor was it given clear authority to finalize climate-related regulations that will only burden American businesses with serious costs,” Wagner said, adding that the full financial services committee plans to review the new rule in detail on April 10.

A bill proposed by Wagner would require the SEC to explicitly identify a market failure and calculate its size before proposing a rule to address it, and the commission would also have to identify any market participants that would be subject to the rule. This bill reflects a common industry refrain that many SEC rule proposals under SEC Chairman Gary Gensler are “a solution in search of a problem.”

William Birdthistle, the former director of the SEC’s Division of Investment Management who recently stepped down, answered this longstanding criticism at the Investment Adviser Association’s 2024 Compliance Conference on March 7 by saying that parents do not wait until their child is in an intersection before acting, therefore if the SEC anticipates an issue in the future, it does not have to wait for the problem to arrive.

Other proposals and drafts before the committee would require the SEC to review every rule every five years and conduct a new economic analysis for each; to issue a report to Congress twice per year on the SEC’s discussions with foreign securities regulators; and to report to Congress on the SEC’s data and cyber security measures.

Still other legislation targets specific SEC rules. One bill would invalidate the private funds advisers rule, currently being challenged in the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. That rule would require private fund advisers to provide more disclosures to clients on fees and performance and to provide valuation opinions to clients for adviser-led transactions. Oral arguments took place in February but the court has not yet ruled on the issue. The subcommittee has not announced a date for a markup or vote on the bills discussed during the hearing.

Tags: ,

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.