Extreme Weather Events Continue to Rise, Increasing Financial Impact

Actuaries Climate Index hits high-water mark for sixth straight quarter.

Extreme weather events are happening more frequently, according to the five-year moving average of the Actuaries Climate Index (ACI), which hit a new high for the sixth straight quarter.

The Actuaries Climate Index is an index of climate risks akin to the consumer price index, but instead of monitoring average price changes over time to a basket of standard goods and services, the ACI measures climate risks based on a basket of six extreme climate components.

The ACI is sponsored by the American Academy of Actuaries, the Canadian Institute of Actuaries, the Casualty Actuarial Society, and the Society of Actuaries. It is designed to provide actuaries, public policymakers, and the general public with objective data about changes in the frequency of extreme climate events over recent decades.

The sponsors of the index say it’s a useful tool for actuaries because climate change is having a financial impact on insurance consumers and the insurance industry, and because actuaries are experienced in assessing and mitigating the financial consequences of risks.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The components of the index include the frequency and duration of extreme high and low temperatures, heavy precipitation, drought, strong wind, and sea level changes. The index is available for 12 regions in the United States and Canada and examines how the six components and their composites are changing over time by region and across the two countries.

The index defines extreme high temperatures as the frequency of daily temperatures above the 90th percentile, while extreme low temperatures are defined as the frequency of daily temperatures below the 10th percentile. Heavy rain is measured by a maximum five-day rainfall in the month or season, while drought is measured by a maximum number of consecutive dry days per year, which is defined as daily precipitation of less than one millimeter.

High wind events are measured by the frequency of daily mean wind speeds above the 90th percentile, as measured by wind power, which has been shown to be proportional to wind damages. And sea level measurements are taken on a monthly basis via tide gauges located at 76 stations with reliable time series. The tide gauges measure sea levels relative to the land below, but since the land is moving in many places, the component measures the combined effect on coastal shorelines of land movements and sea level changes.

The ACI’s moving average smooths out monthly and seasonal fluctuations for a measurement of long-term climate trends. Increasing values in the index indicate increased occurrences of extreme climate events.

The index is expressed in units of standard deviations from the mean for a reference period that spans from 1961 to 1990. After reaching a value of 1.18 standard deviations in spring 2019—which was revised upward because of data updates from a preliminary reading of 1.16 above the index’s historical reference period—the index’s five-year moving average topped out at 1.20 as of summer 2019, which is when the most recent measurements were available.

Related Stories:

Op-Ed: Why CIOs Should Engage on Climate and Take Action

Davos Report Says Climate Change Striking Harder than Expected

Fiduciary Responsibility, Climate Change Bids Investors into Action

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Exclusive: Kentucky Retirement’s Executive Director Says Proposed Board Split Will Increase Taxpayer Burden

David Eager shares his thoughts on proposed legislation that would split the current board into three entities.

Legislation that would see the Kentucky Retirement Systems’ (KRS) board split into three separate entities has elicited comment on its potential consequences for taxpayers and operational inefficiencies from the pension’s executive director, David Eager.

The bill was originated from concerns regarding the board’s supposed lack of representation for the County Employees’ Retirement System (CERS), the leaders of which expressed dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs and are pushing for a bill (HB 484) that would establish a separate board for the system. The legislation on Monday passed through the state’s House Local Government Committee and will now be sent to the full House.

The two respective KRS and CERS boards would report to an entity that would be formed as a result of the bill, the Kentucky Public Pension Authority, which would provide administrative and personnel needs necessitated by the two boards.

Eager testified to the potential complexity and cost the legislation could bring about if passed.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“As the executive director of the Kentucky Retirement Systems, I cannot speak to policy issues of a bill, but I am required to address the cost and administrative impact of proposed bills,” Eager told CIO.

“At KRS we try to follow the principle of Occam’s Razor which is, ‘the best solution is usually the simplest one,’” Eager said. “HB 484 increases the complexity of managing the five main retirement and health care plans. Currently, KRS’s cost of operation is only slightly above its peer public fund universe in spite of the fact that we are much more complex than the average system and cover five separate plans and health care plans, and not just retirement plans.

“Under HB 484, KRS will now be required to serve three boards, not one. That could include preparing for over 70 board and committee meetings versus about 30 today. The new two systems may result in two different benefit structures and retiree health care providers, among others.  There will be additional staff required.”

“Our costs will no doubt increase, which will ultimately have to be borne by taxpayers,” he added.

Eager declined to provide a delegated position of support or opposition to the bill.

Advocates for the bill, including members of the organization Kentucky League of Cities (KLC), said that passage of the bill is in the best interest of CERS.

“This bill would create a new CERS Board of Trustees that is free of political influence regardless of future administrations while also protecting the state’s pension systems and limiting duplication of services,” KLC’s Bryanna Carroll said to a KRS subcommittee in February.

Carroll stated that CERS has 76% of the assets and makes up 64% of the KRS membership, however it only has 35% of the seats on the KRS board, 14% on the actuarial subcommittee, and 11% on the investment committee.

KERS is approximately 13% funded and is regarded as one of the lowest-funded state pension plans in the United States. Spectrum News 1 reported last October that CERS claims to be approximately 60% funded.

Legislators in the state pushed a bill that would see their benefits switch to the KRS in order to “align their interests” with that of their constituents under the ailing pension system.

Related Stories:

Kentucky County Employees’ Retirement System Proposes to Split Board’s Administration

Kentucky Lawmakers to Make Honorable Transfer into Depleted State Retirement System

Kentucky Makes Changes to Free Pension from Funding ‘Death Spiral’

Tags: , , , , , ,

«