Exclusive Coverage: Why the US Dollar Will Stay on Top

Celebrated economist Dambisa Moyo, at a CIO virtual event, describes how America’s strengths should outweigh its downsides, to the buck’s benefit.


China’s on the march, the US has lost clout on the international scene, and the greenback—once known as the Almighty Dollar—has ebbed in value. Time to play a dirge for the dollar? Nope.

“I would not bet against the dollar,” said Dambisa Moyo, global economist at Versaca Investments, and the celebrated author of four New York Times bestselling books. While acknowledging that the US has its share of problems, the nation is in a better place than others, she contended, adding, “It’s the best in a bad neighborhood.”

Moyo was discussing the buck and other macro topics in an appearance at CIO’s virtual conference “Inside the Minds of CIOs.” The one-day event on Wednesday also had a session on how to strengthen pension plans, endowments, foundations, and other institutional investors, as well as a panel on wealth disparity and its effect on markets.

In the dollar discussion, Moyo argued that the US and its currency had “a compelling story” likely to maintain its position vis-à-vis the rest of the world, even surging China. Her talk, moderated by Christine Giordano, CIO’s managing editor, was useful for an investor audience that deals with foreign exchange and international trade on a daily basis.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

At the moment, the dollar is down 5.6% from the start of 2020, but it’s now benefiting from a bump up (2.1% from its early January low point this year) amid good vaccine news and another round of fiscal stimulus, which betokens a rebounding US economy.

Ticking off “selling points” for America and its dollar, Moyo noted that the US has been a “ring-fenced country,” one that hasn’t depended on its neighbors for food, defense, or other vital needs. The US, she said, “has a large, educated population” and extensive infrastructure, although she conceded that some of it was aged and crumbling. She pointed to the US’s “culture of innovation,” which resulted in technology and biotech advances that towered over those of others.

And as a result, she said, this country has the planet’s reserve currency. Even immigration, which she conceded “was a mess now” due to the influx of migrants at the Mexican border, was a long-term boon to this nation of immigrants. The US had long been a magnet “for attracting talent,” she said.

Weaknesses? The relative lack of Washington support for research and development (R&D) now. “Silicon Valley was built by the government,” she said. The biggest risk, she went on, is that America could follow its trajectory over the past century, when the Gilded Age—with its fast growth and innovation—gave way to a cascade of horrors like World War I that culminated in the Great Depression. Immigration then fell sharply.

While hardly forecasting a second Great Depression, she observed that nowadays there’s a lot of attention paid to income inequality. And that might propel the US to be less concerned about growth and “increasing the pie.” Some US companies have too much debt, she said, and “pockets of trauma will come out later.” Example: the 20% of businesses that are “zombies that can’t cover their debts.”

Certainly, Moyo said, No. 2 power China is on the rise. The Beijing regime has embarked on a massive R&D program, thus giving the lie to the notion that China lacks an innovative spirit “and all it can do is copy” the US. She highlighted the vast amount of US Treasury bonds that China holds, in addition to its extensive investments all over the world, from South America to Africa and from Asia to Europe. These factors, she said, “can affect the US” and its standing.

American institutional investors, Moyo observed, now have very little invested in China, about 2% of their holdings. “This will change,” she said, and they’ll see more Chinese exposure. “China is focused on the future,” she said, “and people will want to participate.”

Related Stories:

If You Think the Dollar Has Lost Value Now—Just Wait

World Trade Post-Pandemic: Same Old Problems, Now Worse

One Year Later: 5 Ways the Pandemic Has Changed Investing

Investors’ Dilemma: Buy Stocks in Growing China, or Not?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Cryptocurrencies Still a Speculator’s Game, Warns S&P Global

But central bank digital currencies could disrupt the banking industry’s business model.


As cryptocurrency prices soar to dizzying heights, S&P Global Ratings warns in a recent commentary that the digital assets continue to be “speculative instruments” that are “more useful as a store of value rather than a means for commerce.”

However, the firm said the key to making cryptocurrencies more suitable for investors than speculators lies in the hands of regulators and requires “much greater public confidence.” 

Cryptocurrency prices have been on a rollercoaster ride so far this year, which is exemplified by Bitcoin’s wild volatility during the first two and a half months of the year. The price of Bitcoin surged some $10,000 during the first week of the year to rise above $40,000 from just below $30,000.

After falling back down to the $30,000 threshold on Jan. 21, the digital asset rebounded to above $57,000 exactly one month later before dropping $12,000 in early March only to rebound yet again to crack the $60,000 barrier last week.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Although S&P cites Bitcoin’s price volatility as an indication of its “speculative nature,” the firm noted that acceptability of the instruments has been growing over the past couple of years, albeit more as an investment than a payment method. It attributed a renewed interest in Bitcoin to “ultralow interest rates, substantial liquidity, growing inflation expectations, and high valuations for other securities.”

It also said some investors see Bitcoin as a competitor to gold and other commodities as a hedge against inflation. However, S&P noted that it sees the price volatility of cryptocurrencies as a “limited risk” for the financial institutions it rates.

“We believe a collapse in the value of cryptocurrencies would be just a ripple across the financial services industry, still too small to destabilize the system or weaken the creditworthiness of banks we rate,” S&P said.

The firm added the caveat that some banks, particularly the ones active in marketing cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs), might be exposed to product misselling or reputational risks if prices collapse.

“It could be argued that buyers do not really understand the risks of investing in digital currencies,” said S&P, which added that if Bitcoin prices take a nosedive, it would be retail investors who “would feel most of the heat” as they represent most of the market’s activity either directly or through investment in funds.

S&P said it sees a greater chance of large-scale adoption of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) over the long term as a means of payment instead of private digital currencies. The firm said this could lead to a shakeup within the banking sector.

“What would lead to increased risks for rated banks would be a wider adoption most likely of CBDCs,” S&P said. “Indeed, they may face changes to and perhaps even disruption of their business models.” The firm said another game changer for the financial markets could be cryptocurrencies’ distributed ledger technology, which it said is being used for various purposes by many traditional financial institutions.

Although many institutional investors continue to sit on the sidelines regarding cryptocurrency investments, others have ventured into digital assets with varying degrees of commitment.

In 2018, David Swensen, the CIO of Yale University’s endowment, caused a bit of a stir when reports said he invested an undisclosed amount in two separate cryptocurrency venture funds. And according to crypto news outlet CoinDesk, the endowments of Harvard University and Brown University have been investing in Bitcoin for at least a year.

In January, Blackrock, the world’s largest asset manager, applied to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to include Bitcoin futures in two of its funds. And in November, UK-based Ruffer Investment Management, which has approximately $27.3 billion in assets under management, took a £550 million (US$763.9 million) position on Bitcoin.

More recently, credit card company Mastercard signed a deal with London-based fintech company Wirex to launch a multicurrency Mastercard debit card in the UK and most of Europe, which will allow users to spend up to 18 cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies in real time. And Visa has been working with digital currency platforms such as Coinbase and Fold and has more than 25 digital currency wallets’ services linked to the credit-card firm.

“We believe that digital currencies have the potential to extend the value of digital payments to a greater number of people and places,” Visa said in a statement. “As such, we want to help shape and support the role they play in the future of money.”

Despite the growing interest by institutional investors, S&P cautions that the overall market capitalization of Bitcoin is still relatively small compared with the size of global capital markets, and that the market is still concentrated, which makes it prone to market manipulation.

“We continue to believe that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies will have to overcome their technical and nontechnical weaknesses, including lack of regulatory support, to thrive,” S&P said.

Related Stories:

So … Is Bitcoin Going to Replace the Dollar?

Bitcoin About to See an ‘Avalanche of Institutional Investors,’ Says Scaramucci

Yale Dives into Cryptocurrency

Tags: , , , , , , ,

«