Endowments Should Hold on to Value Assets, NEPC Says

Growth assets and strong manager selection have helped endowments outperform this year.


A preference for growth assets has pushed some university endowments to the top this year, but those institutions should not ditch value assets yet, NEPC consultants say.  

Some standout schools, such as Brown University, pulled ahead of the pack with a tilt toward the technology sector, according to an NEPC study. A technology bet has continued to pay off for investors, particularly in the past year, as the pandemic that shuttered people indoors hastened a transition to an online world.

Brown’s $4.7 billion endowment produced eye-popping results this year with a 12.1% return, which its chief investment officer, Jane Dietze, attributed to strong manager performance. Another plus was investing in three hedge funds that focused on technology, according to a Wall Street Journal story cited in the NEPC report.

Meanwhile, Harvard University returned 7.3%, placing seventh in an NEPC nationwide ranking of endowment returns, because of a 12.2% gain in its public equity holdings, besting the MSCI flagship global equity index—the MSCI ACWI Index—by 10 percentage points. The $41.9 billion endowment also had an overweight allocation to technology and health care. 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Those are strong results, considering school endowments averaged a 2.1% return net of fees when they reported their most recent fiscal year returns in June, according to Investment Metrics, which was cited in the report, while larger endowments posted just 3.7% gains net of fees. 

Access to private markets and better-performing managers have consistently helped larger endowments outperform their smaller cohorts. Larger endowments with more than $1 billion have 9% and 13.6%, respectively, allocated to venture capital and private equity allocations, compared with 2.2% and 6.2% averaged across all endowments.

Still, NEPC cautioned investors in its report that it continues to believe that value stocks are an “important part” of a diversified portfolio. 

“We believe it isn’t time to give up on value even though this investment strategy has lagged growth equities for more than a decade now,” read a company blog post from August. 

Growth investors have outperformed value investors for the past decade. But advocates for value believe that the current low prices of the stocks will eventually help them outperform growth equities in time. 

However, growth investors say growth stocks are appropriately priced given the dominance of technology companies in the capital markets. For example, in the past six years, the portion of the top five tech companies in the S&P 500 index doubled to 22% in 2020, up from 11% in 2014. 

“We believe both styles play a part in investment portfolios,” the post continued. 

Related Stories: 

University Endowments Urged to Hold on to Private Commitments

Brown’s Endowment Is Killing It

Harvard Endowment CEO Goes from ‘Not Pleased’ to ‘Proud’

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

CEO Charged in Rapid COVID-19 Test Scam

Decision Diagnostics’ stock soared 1,500% in less than two months on allegedly false claims of a 15-second COVID-19 test.


The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have charged the CEO of a California-based medical device company for allegedly leading a scheme to defraud investors out of millions of dollars by falsely claiming his company created a 15-second rapid COVID-19 test.

Decision Diagnostics Inc. (DECN) CEO Keith Berman has been charged by the DOJ with one count of securities fraud and one count of making false statements, while the SEC has charged Berman and his firm with violating antifraud provisions of the securities laws.

“During this unprecedented time, when the need for truthful disclosures concerning COVID-19 tests is of vital importance, Decision Diagnostics and its CEO allegedly misled investors by claiming to have made a working test device when all they had was an idea that had not materialized into a product,” Stephanie Avakian, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in a statement.  

According to the indictment, Berman and his firm were “experiencing financial difficulties” early this year and, in an email, he described his personal situation as “perilous.” But in March, he allegedly decided to use the coronavirus pandemic to increase the company’s value, saying in an email that “we need a new story and this coronavirus through impedance is the story that will allow me to raise millions.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

That story allegedly was a fabricated COVID-19 test that not only worked super fast, but also provided a probability statistic that purportedly allowed users to determine the likelihood of a false positive or negative. The indictment alleges that Berman falsely claimed in press releases that Decision Diagnostics had developed a rapid test to detect COVID-19 in a finger prick sample of blood in just 15 seconds. However, Berman allegedly “well knew” the test hadn’t been created.

“Berman used the COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to capitalize on the public health crisis,” according to the indictment. “It was the purpose of the scheme for Berman to artificially increase and maintain the share price of DECN securities to enrich himself through access to additional corporate funds and compensation.”

Berman also allegedly told investors that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was close to approving Decision Diagnostics’ request for emergency use authorization of the new COVID-19 test, despite knowing this wasn’t true.

In late April, the SEC suspended trading in shares of Decision Diagnostics over questions regarding the accuracy of information in the company’s press releases regarding COVID-19. Between early March and the trading suspension, the price of Decision Diagnostics’ stock had soared by more than 1,500%.

“All DECN actually had at the time of Berman’s statements was a theoretical concept that had not yet materialized into a product,” the SEC said in its complaint. “And without a product, Berman knew that DECN could not meet the FDA’s emergency use authorization testing requirements. These misstatements led to surges in the price and trading volume of DECN.”

Berman is also accused of using an alias to post false and misleading positive statements about the company to investors on internet message boards, as well as to refute allegations of fraud and to threaten potential whistleblowers with civil or criminal sanctions. Under the alias, Berman projected that demand for Decision Diagnostics’ test would be “close to 3 billion [test] kits” and claimed that the company was “in the forefront no matter how loud the naysayers are.”

The SEC is seeking a court order permanently enjoining Decision Diagnostics and Berman from directly or indirectly violating those provisions and ordering them to pay civil penalties.

Related Stories:

SEC Charges Biotech Head with Using Pandemic to Defraud Investors

Former Cyberfraud Prevention Firm CEO Arrested for Fraud

SEC Swats Away COVID-19 Scammers

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«