Endowment Index Edges Lower in Q3

Modest gains belie volatile markets, fears of a global slowdown

ETF Model Solutions’ Endowment Index, as calculated by Nasdaq OMX, declined 0.17% on a total return basis for the third quarter of 2019, compared with a global 60-40 stocks/bonds portfolio, which rose 0.33% during the same period. The index and the 60-40 portfolio have kept pace with each other so far in 2019, climbing 12.64% and 12.56% respectively year-to-date.

“The modest decline posted by the Endowment Index belied the price and news volatility that investors experienced during Q3,” said ETF Model Solutions in a release. “Fears of a global economic slowdown, the continuing US-China trade war rhetoric, a 50-year low in US unemployment, an inverted yield curve (U.S.), continued negative interest rates in many developed countries, and other headlines created a fluid news environment for markets to digest.”

During the previous quarter, the index gained 2.34%, while the 60-40 portfolio rose 3.61%.  

Despite the negative quarter, 11 of the index’s 19 components posted gains during the period, although five of those were by less than 1%. The top performing asset class was domestic real estate, which surged 7.40% during the quarter, followed by gold, and international developed fixed income, which gained 5.35% and 3.00% respectively. Domestic fixed income increased 2.41%, while emerging market fixed income, and US equity were up 1.43% and 1.1% respectively.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The eight components that declined during the quarter were led by metals and mining commodities, which tumbled 11.90%, followed by oil and gas commodities, and emerging market equities, which shed 8.6% and 4.28% respectively. Timber commodities, emerging market equities – China, and commodity/div-futures dropped 3.97%, 3.31%, and 3.1% respectively, followed by international developed equity, which was down 0.94%, and hedge funds which edged 0.01% lower.

The Endowment Index uses an objective methodology based upon the portfolio allocations of over 800 educational institutions managing over $600 billion in total assets.  Each of the 19 sub-indexes are investable, and contained within those sub-indexes are more than 34,000 underlying securities. The current target allocation is 52% alternatives, 36% equity, 8% fixed income, and 4% liquidity.

Related Stories:

Endowment Index Falls 9% in 2018

Notre Dame, University of Chicago Endowments Return 7.2%, 6.9%

Private School Endowments Return 7.4% in 2018

Tags: , ,

The Yield Curve Un-Inverts: Time to Celebrate?

Opinions differ on whether this change to a widely followed recession signal means the heat is off.

The yield curve, which inverted last spring to Wall Street’s horror, has switched back to its old pattern lately.   

That’s important because an inverted yield curve is a signal of an impending recession. This augury has proven true through time, with an exception or two. The recession doesn’t have to follow right away, mind you, just happen along in a year or so after the curve inverts.

The natural order of finance is for longer-maturity Treasury securities to pay more than shorter-term ones. After all, the longer you hold a bond, the greater the odds that things could go wrong. Like a ruinous inflation could hit in five years, blasting the value of your 10-year Treasury note.

The curve in question involves the three-month Treasury on the short end, and the 10-year on the long. According to Treasury Department statistics, on Oct. 10, the three-month’s yield had dipped to 1.68% and the 10-year’s yield had risen to 1.67%, almost neck and neck. The next day, the re-inversion occurred, with the three-month staying the same, and the 10-year climbing to 1.76%. As of Tuesday, the spread had widened still more, to 1.63% for the three-month and 1.84% for the 10-year.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Certainly, they still are pretty darn close. They may revert to an inverted curve. The likely reason for their switcheroo is that the Federal Reserve is expected to lower its short-term benchmark today, putting downward pressure on the three-month. And investors are easing away from the 10-year, which they view as a haven security in scary times. Instead, they’re putting their money into stocks, which are riskier but rising amid the current optimism over the US-China trade clash. 

The broader perspective about the yield curve is that the spreads are tellingly narrow. This betokens something awry in the inverting universe. That’s the position of Campbell Harvey, the Duke professor who first spotlighted an inverted curve as a recession signal.

“One thing that’s very important is that my model links the slope of the yield curve to economic growth or future economic growth,” Harvey told Business Insider. “And frankly, whether the yield curve’s flat or slightly upward sloping or inverted, all that means the same thing. It means low growth.”

Opinions differ, of course. James Paulsen, chief investment strategist at Leuthold Group, thinks the danger may well be diminished. As he wrote on his blog, “a return to the positively sloped free-market curves suggest recession risk has been lessened.”

Not abolished, of course. But for those who need a little good news, this will do.

Related Stories: 

Hoo Boy, Inverted Yield Curve Adds to Stock Market Gloom

Inverted Yield Curve Puzzle: Higher Short-Term Yields

Inverted Yield Curve Warning: Is It Different This Time?

Trade War Could Shove US into a Recession, Morgan Stanley Says

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , ,

«