E&Fs Warm to Impact Investing

A poll of endowments and foundations found impact investors are motivated by strong returns and mission alignment.

More than half of endowments and foundations have adopted or are considering impact investing, according to NEPC.

In a survey, the consulting firm found that 28% of endowments and foundations currently utilize impact investing strategies. An additional 25% said they plan to review a socially responsible investment program.

“We’ve seen client interest in the space grow significantly in the past five years and we expect the same growth for the foreseeable future,” said Kristine Butler, a senior consultant in NEPC’s endowments and foundations practice.

Nearly all of those who had implemented impact investing said the approach was aligned with their institution’s mission. Other reasons included encouragement from constituents and a belief that the approach could result in better risk-adjusted returns.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“We’re seeing that the move to impact investing is most frequently motivated by positive pull factors like strong returns and mission alignment, as opposed to push from an institution’s key constituents, such as a board of directors or student body,” Butler said.

Rather than divesting from assets currently in their portfolios, these endowments and foundations said they focused primarily on making mission-related investments. Environmental, social, and governance issues were also highlighted as an area of focus.

Most impact investors (86%) said they expected the strategy to perform equal to or better than the overall market. However, not all respondents saw potential for outperformance.

Half of the endowments and foundations without impact investing strategies in place said they believed the approach could be a headwind to performance because it limits the investable universe. An additional 48% had “mixed thoughts.”

But investors “don’t have to sacrifice returns in order to have a principled investment strategy,” Butler said.

“It’s important the asset owner community understands that impact investing is based on more than merit alone,” she concluded. “The assets, be they in equities or fixed income, must align with the strategic framework of a risk-adjusted portfolio.”

nepc impact investingSource: NEPC’s “Q1 2016 Endowment and Foundation Market Survey” 

Related: The Major Hurdles to Impact Investing

Tell Your Board to Get Real, Managers Warn

It’s hard. Do it anyway, say execs from Prudential, State Street, and Strategic Investment Group, plus Nouriel ‘Dr. Doom’ Roubini.

Milken Prudential SSGA panelThe many institutions—US public pensions in particular—that still assume 7%-plus annual returns have asset management chiefs worried. 

“It is very difficult to go to your board and argue that your expected return should be lower,” said David Hunt, CEO of Prudential’s investment management arm, at the Milken Institute Global Conference on Tuesday. “But that’s exactly what we think asset owners should be doing.” 

Managers should pass on the warning to clients, too, according to Hunt. “As fiduciaries, we find right now that one our mains roles is to tell investors that we don’t think their expectations are reasonable.” 

Nor are they safe, Hunt stressed. “What could drive bad or bubble behavior? It’s unrealistic return expectations.”  

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

He earned vigorous support from his co-panelists—a rare consensus during their debate on asset management’s ballooning role in global capital markets. 

“Pension funds only have two levers,” said Ronald O’Hanley, CEO of State Street Global Advisors. Over-estimate returns long enough, and a defined benefit plan must either break its promises to retirees or charge its mistake to the sponsor. 

“This is not a problem that’s going to get better over time,” Hanley warned.

CIOs’ reluctance to deliver bad news to their bosses has fostered the situations, speakers argued—and so have markets. For a number of years, plan leaders had no (immediate) bad news to share. 

“Investors got pampered by extraordinarily strong securities markets,” said Hilda Ochoa-Brillembourg, founder of outsourced-CIO firm Strategic Investment Group. “But that’s not an accurate expectation for the future.” 

Nouriel Roubini, famed doomsayer and chairman of Roubini Global Economics, found himself, for once, in the majority opinion. 

Related: The Bar for Managers ‘Has Never Been Higher’ & PwC: Returns Not Enough for Success in Asset Management

«