‘Doctor Copper’ May Be Signaling an Upturn—for the Metal and the Economy

Traders in the beaten-down commodity, an economic bellwether, are taking long positions in its futures.



Only one commodity carries a professional honorific: “Doctor Copper.” It’s as if this base metal has a Ph.D. in economics and can call turning points in the economy. The good physician’s latest diagnosis, if history is any guide, suggests things are looking up, both economically and for copper itself, a key component of manufacturing.

Copper certainly could use a good upside. It changed hands at $3.75 per pound as of Monday, down 25% from its record high in March 2022. This is an industrial metal, so persistent predictions of a coming recession have hurt it. But with a whiff of economic optimism in the air—as witness the S&P 500 entering a new bull market—copper has nudged up in the past two weeks.

Perhaps even more significantly, copper traders lately have taken net long (that is, positive) positions in the commodity’s futures contracts—a good portent, according to the McClellan Market Report, a highly regarded financial newsletter. The publication noted that commercial copper traders are net long “to a pretty large degree, which means that they think copper prices are low right now and worth locking in.”

In other words, the metal’s prices likely are on the road to rebounding. Rising demand, and thus prices, for copper has long been linked to economic growth. Industry buys tons of copper for goods such as wire, pipes and machinery. When copper pulls back, the economy tends to contract.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Tom McClellan, editor of the newsletter, wrote that the positions of commercial traders—who, as opposed to speculators, work for companies that use copper—are a pretty good harbinger of what lies ahead. These traders, he wrote, are “the smart money.” By contracting to buy the commodity on the low end, they profit once the price shoots up in coming months (at least, that is what they hope will occur).

McClellan wrote that their actions, as collated weekly by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, usually foreshadow the movements of the Institute for Supply Management’s benchmark, known as the Purchasing Managers’ Index. At present, the PMI, a monthly survey of the folks who buy materials for manufacturers, is down almost 10% over the past 12 months.

McClellan pointed out that “the monthly PMI data are released with a lag. So we can get a clue ahead of time about what the PMI data are going to look like” from traders’ wagers. He argued that the “implication of the big net long position that the commercial traders are holding now in copper futures is that we ought to see a price rebound for copper, part of a rebound for the economy.”

To be sure, the commercial traders are not always prescient. “Occasionally the message from the copper futures data gets it wrong, and the correlation goes astray for a short time,” McClellan stated. He also noted that there is no guarantee that the traders’ maneuvers will predict what ends up happening.

In his view, “extreme bullish or bearish sentiments can persist for a long time before they finally decide to matter.” Further, “copper prices are not required to start upward now just because we notice this condition [traders’ net long positions], but it has proven itself over time as something which matters.”

Related Stories:

The Case for Investing in Copper, the Go-To Metal for Renewable Energy Projects

Limping Commodities Poised to Soar Anew, Says Goldman

Commodities Rise: New Supercycle or Just a Temporary Blip?

Tags: , , , , ,

Navigating the New Bull Market: Be Careful but Not Bearish, Says LPL

The firm advises lowering exposure to stocks in preparation for a recession finally rolling in.

 

 

 

 

 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.


The S&P 500 just crossed over into the bull market pasture, rising last week to 20% higher than its October 2022 low. This optimistic development strengthens the argument that the U.S. might not be headed for a recession and further stock market increases await.

But amid the cheers, fed by the lack of a bank meltdown after a handful of lender failures and by Washington’s debt ceiling agreement, some find it better to proceed cautiously. LPL Financial is a prominent voice in the circumspect, but not the bearish, camp. “We think it makes sense to be a bit careful here,” Jeffrey Buchbinder, LPL’s chief equity strategist, wrote in a commentary. “Importantly, though, neutral is not bearish.”

“There are a lot of reasons to expect the market to go higher between now and year-end,” Buchbinder observed in the research note, co-authored with Adam Turnquist, the firm’s chief technical strategist.

Last year was a rough one for investments, and asset managers took it heavy, as the S&P 500 tumbled 19.5%. Rising inflation, higher interest rates, a threatened recession and war in Ukraine gave investors the heebie-jeebies. But Buchbinder and Turnquist are right about the ample reasons for stocks to keep going up: Inflation seems to be ebbing, the Federal Reserve appears near the end of its tightening campaign, the recession has not appeared and the Ukraine conflict has thus far not widened.

Yet according to LPL, the party might come to an end sooner rather than later because, among other factors, it is likely a recession will appear, at last, later this year or in 2024’s first half. Previously, the house’s prediction had been for a soft landing—a slowdown, yet no recession.

The robust job market and high household savings have delayed the coming economic contraction, the report said. Still, cracks are appearing in that façade, namely slowdowns in the trucking and freight industries. A slowing economy will not necessarily harm the stock market in the run-up to the recession, the LPL strategists contended (although it surely will once the downturn arrives).

“The average loss for the S&P 500 during the six months before a recession has been 1.4% historically, based on data since 1970, though the index did gain nearly 10% ahead of the 1980 and 1990 recessions,” they wrote.

What’s more, narrow leadership of the market, thanks to overbought Big Tech stocks, is not sustainable, they continued. Bonds are much more attractive nowadays due to higher yields, and those loftier rates also lower the value of future cash flows from the tech giants.

So LPL plans to lighten its recommended stock exposure a bit. The old asset allocation blueprint was 63% stocks, 35% bonds and 2% cash. The new benchmark shifts a chunk of equities into fixed income, making the breakdown 60/38/2.

As Buchbinder put it, “That higher hurdle for stocks to outperform bonds and the increasing likelihood of recession within the next six to nine months are the primary reasons for our move to neutral.”

Related Stories:

New York Common Retirement Fund Cuts Public Equities in Favor of Alts

Stocks, Bonds—Hah! Wilshire Lays Out a Broader Asset Allocation

Stocks Are ‘Perfect Hedge’ Against Inflation, Siegel Says

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

«