Direct Indexing Grows, but Plans Don’t Vary Much, Morningstar Says

Wall Street firms trot out their own versions or buy smaller providers to meet demand.




Direct indexing, which has found favor with institutions and financial advisers that seek to tailor traditional indexes to beneficiaries’ preferences, is expanding rapidly. But a Morningstar study found that the different offerings from Wall Street firms are pretty much the same.

To meet investors’ requirements, these providers customize bespoke indexes that do such things as omit tobacco stocks or include those with high environmental, social and governance scores.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Of the $260 billion invested in direct indexing strategies at year-end 2022 (other estimates are higher), “providers have similar offerings,” the research group found in its survey of Wall Street firms and others. Family offices have used these strategies and some employers are said to be eyeing them for defined contribution portfolios.

Direct indexing has been around for years, but current-day computing power has accelerated its use, according to the report by Jason Kephart, Morningstar’s director of multi-asset ratings, and his team. Also, a batch of large asset managers—such as BlackRock, Morgan Stanley and Franklin Templeton—have recently acquired smaller competitors, broadening their range.

The category is poised for growth. Cerulli Associates projects that direct investing will expand at a 12.3% annual rate through 2026, outpacing exchange-traded funds (9.5%) and mutual funds (minus 2%). The latter two categories are, and will continue to be, many times larger than direct indexing, the consultancy estimates: $7.1 trillion and $20.8 trillion, respectively. Cerulli puts direct investing’s current asset size, at $462 billion, higher than does Morningstar, which employs a different gauge.

For Morningstar, examining the beefed-up competitors in the direct indexing field resembles “comparing different chain restaurant menus.” The study said, “Sure, there are small differences, but the core offerings look alike.”

Starting fees range from 0.23% to 0.40%; they usually fall as account sizes increase. Accounts of around $5,000 usually have just three indexes they can choose to customize, mainly the S&P 500, MSCI All-Country World and MSCI Europe, Australasia and Far East indexes. Larger accounts get to add more, such as the Russell 2000 and MSCI Emerging Markets.

From there, Morningstar added, investors can “choose their own adventure,” although it will come from a standard palette.

The one area that is tough to parse among the direct index providers is how these firms go about their “tax harvesting,” in which they offset gains with losses, . Extending the fast-food metaphor, Morningstar referred to these methods to a “secret sauce.”

At the same time, other large players who have belatedly entered the scene are struggling to catch up and boost their offerings, Morningstar found. For example, JPMorgan offers just a U.S. large-cap direct indexing option, and Charles Schwab has four indexes covering U.S. large caps, international large caps, ESG and small caps. Both only started in direct indexing last year.

Related Stories:

Downsides of Direct Indexing: Tracking Error and Less Diversification

Wilshire Brings Out More Fine-Tuned Indexes

New Champs: Index Funds Edge Past Actives in Stock Market Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Nevada Bill Marks Third Try at Establishing State-Sponsored Retirement Plan

Two previous attempts to pass similar legislation ended up going nowhere.



Nevada State Senator Dallas Harris is hoping the third time is the charm and has introduced a bill to create a state-supported retirement plan after two previous attempts by the legislature died on the vine.

The bill, SB305, would create the Nevada Employee Savings Trust, which would be directed by a board of trustees with the power to establish a retirement savings program and automatically enroll private employees who do not have a retirement savings plan available via their workplace. To be enrolled, an employee would need to be at least 18 years old, have worked at the same place for 120 days and have wages that are allocable to the state, although employees would be allowed to opt out.

 “It is my opinion that if we don’t get people to start saving, our social programs are going to be in trouble in 30 years and 40 years,” Harris, one of four primary sponsors, said during an April 5 hearing on the bill, according to the Nevada Independent. “This program costs nothing to the state. It costs nothing to businesses. And it’s completely run on the fees of the participants.” 

The bill passed the Nevada Senate’s Committee on Government Affairs last week, but that has happened in each of the previous two legislative sessions, which are held in odd-numbered years. Harris also sponsored a 2021 attempt to create a state-supported retirement plan, and that effort was halted in the Nevada Senate Committee on Finance. A 2019 version was introduced in the Nevada Assembly but did not get past the Nevada Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

 The current bill stipulates that the board is required to establish one or more investment funds and that the underlying investments of each fund must be diversified “so as to minimize the risk of large losses under any circumstances.” The board also may, at any time, add, replace or remove any investment fund.

 The underlying investments may include shares of mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, publicly traded equity and fixed-income securities, as well as other investments available for investment. However, the investment funds would be prohibited from investing in any bond, debt instrument or other security issued by the state of Nevada.

 Since 2012, 46 states have either implemented a state-based retirement savings program, studied program options or considered legislation, according to Human Interest Inc., a provider of 401(k) and 403(b) plans. There are currently 16 states and two cities that have either passed laws or have pending legislation that outlines new programs for private sector workers, with eight states having active laws. 

 However, the Nevada Chapter of the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors opposes the bill.

 “While well-intentioned, we do not believe this proposal provides a meaningful step toward solving the retirement savings gap,” Neal Waters, a member of the NAIFA-Nevada Board of Directors, said in submitted testimony at a hearing on the proposed legislation. Waters added that these types of “state-facilitated retirement programs do not address the foundational reasons Americans are not saving more for retirement.” 

Waters said the state’s private retirement plan marketplace already offers “diverse, affordable options to individuals and employers.”

 

Related Stories:

Virginia Legislature Passes Bill to Create State-Run Retirement Plan

Oklahoma Bill Would Create State-Run Retirement Plan

Wisconsin Treasurer Recommends Creating State-Run Retirement Plan

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

«