A Dire Coronavirus Economic Scenario: US Grocery Shortfall

Signs of hoarding in Washington state and elsewhere in the West prompt fears of panic stockpiling nationwide.

The everyday consumer impact of the new coronavirus is relatively mild in the US thus far, compared to places such as China, South Korea, Japan, and Italy. But that doesn’t mean Americans are free and clear should the contagion spread. The most immediate sign would be a panic-driven stockpiling of groceries.

Hoarding has hit Washington state, where 10 virus deaths, the most in the country, have occurred. (Another was just confirmed in California.) Powdered milk sales have almost quadrupled in Washington, according to marketing data firm Catalina. Dried beans, grains, and rice buying has risen 84%. Plus, hand sanitizer purchases have spiraled 836% and chlorine bleach sales have more than doubled.

What products are most at risk of disruption? Anything imported from overseas, especially from the hardest-hit regions. That means consumer packaged goods and frozen meat and fish, said Elena Belavina, associate professor of applied economics at Cornell University SC Johnson College of Business, who studies grocery retail and supply chains. 

If the products are domestically originated, there’s less of a problem. “Fruit and vegetable supply chains are largely American,” she said, “and mostly span areas that are, so far, less affected by the virus.” Should COVID-19 become really entrenched in the US, she added, that could choke off delivery of farm products. Travel bans, imposed in China and now in parts of Italy, could impede delivery of fresh fruit and vegetables to the Northeast, where they largely aren’t grown, she noted.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

 “But that seems unlikely,” she added, “based on what we have seen in terms of the containment efforts in China,” where delivery of supplies has not been much of a problem.

A weakness during a civil emergency is the modern supply chain arrangement, where inventories are lean and products are sped to distribution points when ordered. This just-in-time inventory approach, Belavina pointed out, is very efficient when things are normal, she said, but this system has “surprisingly little slack to deal with panic buying.” Throughout the nation, people have swept store shelves clean of face masks and hand sanitizers.

One distasteful side effect of hysteria-induced purchases, said her Cornell colleague, Dana Radcliffe, senior lecturer in business ethics, is price gouging. Defenders of jacking up prices among such frenzies say that retailers are only obeying the laws of supply and demand.

“The problem, however,” Radcliffe argued, “is that, in emergencies where critical supplies are scarce, the conditions of a ‘free and fair market’ don’t exist—since the buyers don’t have options.”

As Americans watch the coronavirus saga unfold, the fervent hope is that none of these dire supply situations appears on US soil. And especially not any more virus-related deaths in the US. 

Related Stories:

Goldman Warns Coronavirus Could Bring a Market Correction Soon

Is the Worst of the Virus Market Rout Close?

As Virus Punishes Stocks, El-Erian Warns: Don’t Buy the Dips

Tags: , , , , , , ,

What’s in a Name? Possibly Too Much, or Not Enough

SEC says today’s Names Rules may not be effective in stopping the implementation of misleading fund names.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is soliciting public comment pertaining to the Names Rule, in addressing whether the stipulation is effective in its purpose of avoiding “misleading investors about its potential holdings and risks” when funds are named.

“The name of a registered investment company or a business development company (a ‘fund’) is a tool for communicating with investors. It is often the first piece of fund information investors see and, while investors should look closely at a fund’s underlying disclosures, a fund’s name can have a significant impact on their investment decision,” the SEC said in a report.

The procedure for assembling the framework was launched with a 60-day solicitation period for public comment on whether the existing Names Rule is effective in prohibiting funds from using names that are materially deceptive or misleading. The final rule requires a fund to invest at least 80% of its assets in the manner suggested by its name.

The SEC has found several challenges in adhering to the current Names Rule since its implementation in 2001. One of the problems is that funds increasingly use derivatives and other financial instruments that provide leverage, and “because the Names Rule is an asset-based test, it may not be well-suited [to] derivatives investments that provide significant exposure to a “type of investment.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Convertible securities are also posing a challenge for the rule, since these types of investments harbor both debt and equity characteristics that could potentially diverge from a fund’s implicit strategy implied by its name.

The trending theme of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing also is posing a considerable challenge, with many different funds simply putting “ESG” in their name. However, ESG does not determine asset-level holdings, thus deviating from the intended purpose of the Names Rule.

Todd Rosenbluth, director of mutual fund and ETF research at CFRA, cited the $1.2 billion First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF (FXU) as an example of a fund that might surprise some investors, Investment News reported.

“The fund has a nearly 30% allocation to telecom companies, including AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile that are not utilities,” he said. “An investor buying this fund would likely be surprised to find AT&T is one of the larger holdings.”

Related Stories:

SEC Lets Steven Seagal Know He’s Not Above the Law

Research Finds Large Variations in Performance Across LPs Investing in the Same Funds

SEC Charges Convicted Criminal Over Fraudulent Coin Offering

Tags: , , , , ,

«