Despite Pension Overhaul, New Jersey Suffers Another Credit Rating Blow

Even with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s proposed public pension reforms, Fitch Ratings has downgraded the State of New Jersey's outstanding general obligation (GO) bonds to 'AA-' from 'AA'.

(August 18, 2011) — Following Standard & Poor’s decision to downgrade US debt, Fitch Ratings has downgraded New Jersey’s bond rating a notch, citing the state’s failure to make full pension payments and its sluggish economic recovery despite proposed pension reforms.

New Jersey’s rating is now among the lowest in the nation, and could make it more costly for the state to borrow. Only California and Illinois have ratings lower than the AA-minus Fitch gave New Jersey.

The downgrade reflects the mounting budgetary pressure presented by growing funding needs for the state’s unfunded pension and employee benefit liabilities, amid a weak economic recovery, a high debt burden, limited financial flexibility, and persistent structural imbalance, Fitch explained. “Despite the recent passage of pension and health benefit reform legislation…continued pension funding level deterioration is projected,” the Fitch analysis said in a report, noting that this means the state will be required to pay more for pensions in the coming years.

The move by Fitch Ratings is the third time in less than six months that Wall Street has downgraded New Jersey’s bond rating. Before the state budget was finalized, both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s gave New Jersey similar low ratings.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

In March, a Moody’s Investors Services report predicted that New Jersey pension reform would deteriorate despite budget reform proposals by Gov. Chris Christie. The ratings agency said that the pension system faces a $30.7 billion unfunded liability for state workers. “New Jersey faces pension funding requirements that, like Illinois’, are straining the state’s budget,” the two-page report said. “In fiscal 2010, New Jersey failed to make any contribution, and it did not budget a contribution for the current year. In addition, the state faces retiree health benefit liabilities that are even more onerous than its pension burden. The governor has proposed additional reforms, including reversal of a 9% benefit increase granted in 2001, elimination of automatic cost-of-living adjustments, and increases in both the minimum retirement age and required employee contributions.”

The report said New Jersey is now “the seventh-lowest funded system in the country.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

SEC Accused of Hiding Wall Street Wrongdoings

Senator Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) has asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to account for serious allegations that case-related document destruction may have compromised enforcement in cases involving activity at large banks and hedge funds during the financial crisis.

(August 18, 2011) — US Senator Charles Grassley (R., Iowa) has asked the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to respond to allegations that it destroyed documents and compromised enforcement cases involving activity at large banks and hedge funds during the height of the financial crisis in 2008.

The US regulatory agency is being accused of destroying files from initial investigations of firms including Goldman Sachs Group, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Lehman Brothers, SAC Capital Advisors, and Bernard Madoff Investment Securities.

“From what I’ve seen, it looks as if the SEC might have sanctioned some level of case-related document destruction,” Grassley said in a statement. “It doesn’t make sense that an agency responsible for investigations would want to get rid of potential evidence. If these charges are true, the agency needs to explain why it destroyed documents, how many documents it destroyed over what timeframe, and to what extent its actions were consistent with the law.”

According to Grassley’s statement posted on his website, his investigation of the US regulatory body comes after an agency whistleblower sent him a letter describing “the SEC’s unlawful destruction of the federal records generated in at least 9,000 informal investigations.” The documents are said to support “matters under inquiry,” which is the first step in investigating a case that may or may not result in a formal investigation.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

After reviewing the whistleblower’s letter and other related documents, Grassley sent a letter to the SEC, requesting a full account of any document destruction policies, including whether the allegations are correct that the SEC destroyed documents related to major Wall Street banks and hedge funds.

In a letter to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, Grassley wrote: “If (the whistleblower’s) allegations are correct, the intentional destruction of at least 9,000 MUIs would appear to greatly handicap the SEC’s ability to create patterns in complex cases and calls into question the SEC’s ability to properly retain and catalog documents.”

Click here to read Grassley’s letter to the SEC chairman.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«