Despite Backlash, ESG Hiring Remains Elevated

Asset owners, consultants and asset managers are all engaged in an increasingly competitive fight for ESG talent.



A quick look at ESG headlines these days mostly tells a story of backlash. Governors and state attorneys general are making it more difficult for state funds to be invested in funds or with managers using environmental, social and governance criteria.

Members of Congress tried to limit how retirement plans could consider ESG factors when selecting investments. Even in Europe, recent regulatory changes to ESG classifications have prompted allegations of widespread greenwashing. Still, in the U.S. and abroad, asset owners, asset managers and investment consultants are hiring for a wide variety of ESG roles, and sources say they are unlikely to stop any time soon.

“Even though it is politically charged at the moment, investors, customers, employees and other stakeholders aren’t letting up on their demands for transparency and action on material areas of risk and opportunity,” says Miriam Wrobel, senior managing director and global leader of environmental, social and governance and sustainability at FTI Consulting. Her company is both hiring for ESG roles and working with clients on finding talent.

Wrobel says there is “exponential growth and demand” for ESG-related reporting, strategies and business transformation. That is pushing investors, public companies and asset managers to bring on new people who can gather the necessary data and analyze it.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Those needs are expressed in a recent job posting from the San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System, which is looking for an ESG investment officer. The posting suggests that the role will primarily be focused on ESG reporting, data analysis and integration.

The New York City Office of the Comptroller is looking for a similar person: an ESG integration officer to work with both the CIO and the Bureau of Asset Management to find ways of integrating ESG into investment considerations. The New York State Insurance Fund and the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund’s office of investment management have similar roles open.

On Tuesday, Franklin Templeton also announced a new sustainability hire who will be working on ESG integration and strategy. James Andrus joins from the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to be vice president of Sustainability Global Markets, a newly created leadership role within the firm’s Global Sustainability Strategy Team.

In his new role, he will work across teams and jurisdictions to set the direction of Franklin Templeton’s sustainable investment team. At CalPERS, Andrus served as the Interim Managing Investment Director for Sustainable Investing and led CalPERS’ sustainable investment strategy.

Andrus will report to Anne Simpson, Franklin Templeton’s Global Head of Sustainability, who had previously been the managing investment director of board governance and sustainability at CalPERS.

But it may not be easy to fill these roles. All of these postings are looking for someone with at least five years of experience in ESG, and the pensions are competing against some of the world’s largest asset managers, including Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, Franklin Resources, State Street and Fidelity. Each of those companies has ESG spots open, as do many consultants, including Alvarez & Marsal, FTI and Wilshire.

“We’re seeing more and more professionals with formal ESG training, so there is a strong pipeline of talent, but there isn’t a sufficient talent pool that has both the formal training and the real-world expertise to execute,” Wrobel says.

Paul Aversano, managing director and global practice leader for global transaction advisory business at Alvarez & Marsal, agrees. He is in the process of expanding the firm’s ESG practice as a result of growing client demand. He says Alvarez & Marsal is getting requests for help with due diligence, transaction advisory and data/reporting. When he looks at clients’ ESG interests, he says it is hard to take the backlash seriously.

“On the transaction side, buyers are willing to pay more for a company with a positive or improving ESG footprint,” Aversano says. “On the talent management side, we’re getting questions about our policies, and so are our clients. New hires don’t want to work somewhere that isn’t at least looking at ESG. If you look at corporates, the ESG disclosure rules and regulations continue to evolve, and companies have to track that—especially if they have a global footprint. Other jurisdictions aren’t going to stop asking for this data.”

He adds that there are material financial risks that can be missed if companies, sponsors and investors are not tracking things like climate risk, which could lead to trapped assets down the line.

“A lot of this is really a data collection exercise,” he says. “You want to have the most information you can about an asset or a company or a transaction, and you need people who can get that data.”

These realities are also popping up for asset managers. Many asset managers have a global footprint, and there is still significant demand for ESG strategies abroad—especially in Europe, the Middle East and Asia. For firms that have operations in all of those areas, avoiding ESG just because of pushback in the U.S. likely is not the most prudent or efficient use of resources, says Tyler Cloherty, managing director at Deloitte’s asset management strategy consultant, Casey Quirk.

“It’s kind of a highest-common-denominator thing,” he says. “You need to be able to maintain credibility everywhere you do business. We’re seeing from some investors that even if they aren’t saying they are specifically interested in ESG, they’re still asking for ESG-type data in their due diligence process. ESG is an area that continues to evolve, but I think it’s hard to argue that we’re going to go back to a time when these considerations weren’t included. Firms will have to keep hiring for that.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sovereign Wealth Funds’ Views on Climate Evolving Rapidly

Report finds tenfold jump in SWFs that see addressing climate change as consistent with their mandate.



In less than two years, sovereign wealth funds’ views of climate change’s impact on investment returns has evolved rapidly, according to a report that finds that the funds now see the issue as a financial one, rather than a social one.

The third annual report, released by the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds and the One Planet Sovereign Wealth Funds Network, details a survey of and interviews with 40% of the world’s sovereign wealth funds. The research found that the institutional investors are integrating climate-related issues into their investment process far more than had been expected.

“In 2022, we expected to see a leveling off of this process and perhaps less dramatic trends,” the report stated. “However, even in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and the on-going conflict in Ukraine, sovereign wealth funds continue to prioritize integrating climate-related issues into their investment process and understand the impact of climate change on their investments.”

The report said that in 2021, only 9% of respondents said addressing the effects of climate change was part of their mandate, while 65% said climate change issues were not strictly part of their mandate, though they did consider it when investing. But just a year later, 91% of respondents said they believed addressing climate change was consistent with their mandate, and 74% said it was actively part of their mandate.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

There has also been a significant change in the reason sovereign wealth funds provide for including climate-related criteria in their investment process. In 2021’s survey, half of the respondents said they were considering climate change in their investment decisions because it was “the right thing to do,” rather than for its financial benefit, while 23% said doing so would improve long-term returns or reduce risk. However, there was a sharp turn in 2022, as 60% of respondents said they integrated climate change considerations to minimize investment risk and improve long-term returns, with 40% saying they were motivated because it was “the right thing to do.”

The IFSWF and One Planet SWF Network also said in the report that in 2020, they laid down six challenges to sovereign wealth funds. After two years, “we have observed progress across all six challenges,” the organizations stated.

The six challenges were: adopt and implement climate-related policies; seek out the appropriate talent and expertise; explore board member and executive education; use metrics to show climate impact, as well as comparable returns and risk reduction; communicate the strategic importance of climate; and partner with peers and international initiatives to share experience and generate greater leadership.

“Since 2020, the sovereign wealth funds that responded to our survey have reported significant progress in their understanding of the detrimental effect climate change may have on their long-term returns and how they monitor their impact,” the report stated. “They have also become more transparent, requiring better reporting from their asset managers and portfolio companies, and now produce more information on how they approach the issues.”

However, sovereign wealth funds are still finding significant barriers to their progress, the report said, particularly in acquiring data on climate impact from portfolio companies and asset managers.

“Without accurate data, it is difficult for sovereign wealth funds and other investors to understand their risk exposure to climate change accurately,” said the report. “While it is true that sovereign wealth funds can request this information, it is also important to not over-burden these companies and asset managers by standardizing the data requested.”


Related Stories:

UK Pension Regulator Targets Plans for Climate, ESG Non-Compliance

Investors’ Use of Climate and Greenhouse Gas Information Is Growing, SEC Chair Says

Federal Reserve Proposes Climate Risk Framework for Large Financial Institutions

Tags: , , , ,

«