Democrats Favored to Win the Senate, but Odds Narrow, Goldman Says

The firm’s analysis, based on stocks affected by a Biden tax boost, tracks findings of the prediction markets.


Wall Street prognosticators, who opine on stocks and the economy regularly, are closely following the races for the US Senate. They join the prediction markets in giving better than even odds to the Democrats taking over the Senate. But that Dem lead has slipped recently.

According to a Goldman Sachs analysis, stocks that would be affected by a corporate tax hike—which a President Joe Biden and a Democratic Senate and House would likely enact—indicate slightly lower odds that the Democrats will prevail in taking control of the upper chamber.

In September, Goldman’s stock indicator showed about 70% odds of the Democrats winning the Senate. Now, that has fallen to roughly 58%. Meanwhile, the prediction markets’ take on the Dems’ chances has fallen to around 55% from 65%.

Democratic presidential nominee Biden has proposed partly rolling back the 2017 corporate tax decrease that President Donald Trump and Congress (with Republicans then in charge of both houses) passed. The tax was lowered to 21% from 35%, and Biden wants to lift it to 28%.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The House now is in the Democrats’ hands, and there are more GOP than Democratic Senate seats up for election, 23 versus 12. That makes maintaining a Senate majority more difficult for the Republicans. Not to mention that some of the Senate races in traditionally Republican states are competitive.

“The upshot is that, while financial market participants are taking a view on the election outcome,” wrote Goldman analysts Blake Taylor and Alec Phillips, “the implied probabilities suggest that they, like prediction markets, are taking a somewhat more cautious view of the publicly available polling data.”

The 2016 polling failed to pick up how tight the presidential contest had become, although Democrat Hillary Clinton’s lead back then was smaller than that of former Vice President Biden’s this time (he leads Trump by 9 percentage points, in an average of different surveys). How well the top of the ticket fares often has an impact on state-level elections, namely for the Senate. In key battleground states, Biden is ahead but by less of a margin than he has nationally.

For the 23 Republican-held Senate seats on the ballot, the Cook Political Report contends, two lean Democratic and seven are toss-ups. Assessing the 12 the Democrats hold, just one leans Republican, in traditionally GOP Alabama. That’s occupied by Senator Doug Jones, who won in a 2017 special election, to fill a vacancy when Republican Jeff Sessions left to become US attorney general.

Related Stories:

Both Trump and Biden Will Bring Higher Corporate Taxes, PwC Survey Says

Biden Tax Hikes Would Help Junk Bonds, Says Market Savant

More Federal Spending Means Higher Taxes, Says Leon Cooperman

Tags: , , , , , , ,

DOL, Dubious About ESG Pension Investing, Cuts It a Bit of Slack in Final Rule

The regulation still requires that plans only use financial considerations in investments, but says companies’ pollution and bad governance may be factors, too.


The Department of Labor (DOL) on Friday eased its stance a small amount against environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing, but it remained determined in its declaration in a final rule that Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan fiduciaries must make investment decisions that won’t sacrifice returns.

In June, the DOL proposed a rule that determined employer-sponsored plans have a sole fiduciary duty to beneficiaries, not to social causes advanced through ESG investing. 

The proposal proved to be hugely controversial in the investment community. More than 1,100 letters poured in during the 30-day comment period, and more than 7,600 signers backed separate petitions. Many argued the ESG rule would chill sustainable investments for the broader investment community beyond company retirement plans. 

But in its final rule, the DOL said it acknowledges that there are cases in which ESG factors could be considered financially material. In the summary of the final rule, the regulator said a company’s failure to properly dispose of hazardous waste could be an example of possible business risk. Poor corporate governance was another example of a non-pecuniary factor that could implicate risk. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Still, the final rule that stipulates investors must solely use financial considerations for investments could continue to have a chilling effect on ESG investments. 

“Protecting retirement savings is a core mission of the US Department of Labor and a chief public policy goal for our nation,” US Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia said in a statement. 

“This rule will ensure that retirement plan fiduciaries are focused on the financial interests of plan participants and beneficiaries, rather than on other, non-pecuniary goals or policy objectives,” he added. 

ESG proponents argue that sustainable investments need not run contrary to fiduciary considerations. A Harvard research paper recently determined that ESG investments perform better during market downturns, and over the long-term, than do traditional investments. 

But the DOL, which unveiled the rule the week before the US presidential election, has been fearful that the explosion in popularity of ESG approaches would present additional risk to investments. A Morningstar report found that assets invested in sustainable funds grew nearly four times larger in 2019 than in 2018. 

Regardless, Lauren Goodwin, economist and multi-asset portfolio strategist at New York Life Investments, said last week in pre-election comments that she anticipates “attention to ESG investing to increase over time regardless of who sits in the Oval Office.” 

A labor- and climate-focused Biden administration would likely alleviate challenges facing ESG investments, she said, while a Trump administration could continue to be skeptical about the sustainable investments. 

Related Stories: 

DOL Proposal Will Chill ESG Corporate Pension Investing, Advocates Say

DOL Proposes Exemption, New Compensation for Fiduciaries

SEC’s Proposal to Raise 13F Threshold Stifles Transparency, Critics Say

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«