Canada Pension Plan Increases Green, Transition Investments by 20% to C$79B

The C$575 billion ($416.4 billion) Canada Pension Plan Investment Board’s investments in green and transition assets rose 20% to C$79 billion, as of March 31, from C$66 billion at the same time in 2022, according to its “2023 Report on Sustainable Investing.”

The pension giant, which aims to invest at least $130 billion in green and transition assets by 2030, also announced it has reached carbon neutrality for internal operations for scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions sources for fiscal 2023.

“Investing sustainably drives value for CPP Investments and is an important factor at every stage of our investment process,” John Graham, president and CEO of the CPPIB, said in a release. “CPP Investments’ approach to sustainable investing contributes to our ability to compete globally and creates long-term value.”

While championing its green and transition investments, the pension fund affirmed its belief in active ownership, hoping to create better long-term sustainability-related outcomes and generate more value for the fund. For example, it uses its shareholder voting rights to ensure alignment between the pension fund’s expectations of directors and their actions.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert daily newsletter. 

“As a long-term investor, we prefer to actively engage with and attempt to influence companies when we disagree with a position taken by management or a board of directors of our active holdings,” the report stated. “We have the ability to be a patient provider of capital and to work with companies to bring about change.”

However, the report stated that the pension fund may decide not to pursue or maintain investments in companies if it decides a firm’s strategy or lack of engagement with sustainability-related issues undermine the long-term competitiveness of the business; if sustainability-related factors impact its brand and reputation; or for legal reasons.

The CPPIB report also stated that a company’s board should be majority independent to deliver the best outcomes; however, it is reasonable for a controlling shareholder to have representation on a board proportionate to its economic equity stake. It also recommended that company boards have “sufficient diversity” and strongly encouraged boards to disclose their diverse attributes when appropriate “to fully and accurately evaluate board diversity holistically.”

The CPPIB noted that it updated its proxy voting guidelines earlier this year to include consideration of nature-related dependencies and potential impacts on companies’ long-term performance, highlighting a difference between the expectations on boards regarding climate and nature.

“Although the two intersect, we see the difference as significant enough to warrant a specific reference to nature in the list of factors we call out as examples for boards to anticipate, manage and integrate into their strategy,” the pension fund’s report stated. It further emphasized a need to understand businesses’ dependency on natural systems through specific commodities or operating locations and to determine whether that dependency is material and sustainable.

When that dependency is material and unsustainable, according to the pension fund, boards should consider how to adjust their operations to create a more sustainable dependency or work with their supply chain to do the same. The CPPIB added that as a member of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures’ Forum, it follows the group’s guidance.