Conn. Gov Vetoes Budget over Pension Concerns

Gov. Dannel Malloy said the budget would eliminate hundreds of millions of dollars in pension fund contributions.

Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy has vetoed the $40.7 billion biennial budget passed by the state’s general assembly, saying it “adopts changes to the state’s pension plans that are both financially and legally unsound.”

Malloy said the proposed budget attempts to shirk the state’s pension fund obligations by eliminating $144 million in pension contributions this fiscal year, $177.8 million next year, and hundreds of millions of dollars in the following years “solely by seeking to limit the state’s authority to enter into future agreements over pension benefits,” Malloy said in his veto letter. “This budget grabs ‘savings’ today on the false promise of change a decade from now, a promise that cannot be made because no legislature can unilaterally bind a future legislature.”

The Democratic governor said the bill, which was supported by Republican lawmakers, makes unilateral changes to vested pension benefits, and would risk a constitutional challenge, as well as exposure to potential litigation, and hundreds of millions of dollars of liability.

“The state is already paying hundreds of millions in penalties for a similarly foolhardy approach taken by a previous governor,” wrote Malloy, adding that “the potential financial consequences of this maneuver increase exponentially when used as the basis to avoid meeting our obligations to fund our pensions.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Malloy argued that prior administrations and legislatures have consistently underfunded the state’s pension obligations, which he said has amassed an unfunded debt obligation that has “increasingly stymied our ability to make the key investments necessary to strengthen and grow our economy.”

He also said the budget diverts teachers’ pension contributions to the general fund, but without offering a solution to reform funding for the teachers’ pension system. This could leave “future taxpayers at the precipice of a fiscal cliff that could reach as high as $6 billion,” he wrote. “The diversion of the teachers’ retirement contributions from the teachers’ retirement fund creates significant potential tax consequences for the employees and jeopardizes the tax status of the entire retirement fund.”

Malloy urged both parties to work together to negotiate a new budget, and warned that failure to reach a deal soon could risk federal approval for $343.9 million in increased provider tax revenue, and $366.5 million in federal Medicaid reimbursement, which he said are critical to balancing the budget and increasing reimbursements to providers.

“This budget is unbalanced, unsustainable, and unwise,” said Malloy. “Through these fiscally irresponsible changes, this budget would fail to move the state closer to fully funding our pension obligations, a stated goal of legislative leaders in both parties.”

Tags: , , ,

Pension Protection Fund Lowers Levy by 10%

Lifeboat fund reduces levy estimate for 2018-19 to £550 million from £615 million.

The UK’s Pension Protection Fund (PPF) is lowering its levy estimate for the next fiscal year to £550 million from the £615 million estimate for 2017-18.

The PPF said that its financial position remains sound, despite operating in a “particularly challenging environment” amid political and economic uncertainty, and with pension deficits remaining high.

“While the risks we face are significant, we’re in a strong financial position and we’re still on track to meet our long-term funding target,” said David Taylor, general counsel for the PPF. “As a result, we’ve been able to set a levy estimate for 2018-19 that is 10% lower than last year.”

The PPF is a statutory fund that provides compensation to members of eligible defined benefit pension plans in the event of insolvency, and when there are insufficient assets to cover PPF level of compensation.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“Of course, an individual scheme’s levy will depend not just on the aggregate amount we aim to collect, but also on movements in the risk it poses to us,” added Taylor. “We’ve always sought to make our levy calculation methodology reflect that risk as well as we can.”

The PFF also said it will implement the majority of proposals consulted on in March for the third levy triennium. The consultation focused on proposals to develop the assessment of insolvency risk for the PPF levy, as well as proposed changes in other areas, such as contingent assets, and the certification of deficit-reduction contributions.

“If these rules were in place now, two-thirds of schemes would have seen a decrease in their 2017-18 levy, with around a fifth of schemes seeing an increase,” said Taylor. “This redistribution reflects the improved risk reflectiveness of the levy as a result of the changes we will be making for the third triennium.”

The PPF said it will consult on the new proposals and the draft levy rules for 2018-19 until Nov. 1, after which the fund will finalize the rules and publish the levy determination in December.

Tags: , , ,

«