Columbia Endowment Chief Heading to Hawaii

Tim Donahue replaces longtime CIO Elizabeth Hokada.

Tim Donahue

Tim Donahue, chief investment officer of the Columbia Investment Management Company will dodge the cold New York weather this fall when he heads to Hawaii as CIO of the Kamehameha Schools endowment, the organization said in a statement.

Donahue, who’s overseen Columbia University’s $11 billion endowment since 2016, will get tropical on October 21, succeeding Elizabeth Hokada, who will retire after 14 years with the $8.2 billion Kamehameha.

“I can’t think of a CIO job in the country that is more important than this one,” Donohue said. “I look forward to continuing the momentum created by KS’ investment team.”

Kamehameha Schools educates native Hawaiians via three K-12 campuses, 29 preschools, and community education and scholarship programs, according to its website.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Kamehameha’s asset allocation was 31% Hawaiian real estate, 21% absolute return, 20% marketable equities, 13% private equity, 7% fixed income, and 8% real estate, according to the fund’s 2017-2018 annual report.

Columbia has yet to select Donahue’s successor. He was unable to be reached for comment.

Related Stories:

Columbia Endowment Names New CIO

Columbia Endowment Reports 9.0% Return for 2018

Tags: , , , , , ,

CalPERS, Wellington Launch Climate Risk Evaluation Framework

Guide aims to help firms assess, disclose climate change risks to their business.

The $373 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), and investment management firm Wellington Management have launched a framework designed to help companies assess and disclose the potential risks of climate change on their business.

The framework is intended to improve how companies disclose their physical vulnerabilities and help asset owners and investment managers better evaluate . how companies they invest in will be able to adapt to risks.

“It is critical for us to understand how our companies are planning to adapt to the physical risks of climate change,” Beth Richtman, CalPERS’ managing investment director of sustainable investments, said in a statement.

Richtman said that without this information CalPERS can only guess what, if any, steps a company has taken to prepare for the future. “To date, we find financial disclosures have a long way to go in order to provide the type of information that we would find impactful to our investment process,” she added.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The framework is the product of a collaborative initiative formed last September between the two institutional investors, who define physical risks as inclusive of – but not limited to – extreme heat, drought, wildfires, hurricanes, flooding, and water access.

The aim is for the framework to act as a guide for management teams to disclose how they identify, measure, and manage their exposures to these newly recognized risks. CalPERS and Wellington said the guide can help companies better relay information to capital providers, investors, markets, and regulators; meet disclosure requirements more effectively; recognize and adapt to the effects of climate change on operations; form a baseline for comparing and testing assumptions against industry counterparts; and assure investors that they take these risks seriously.

Wellington said that according to its research, many companies overlook and underreport climate-related physical risks that can be material and important to disclose to stakeholders.

The guide provides information on the different types of climate risks, and their potential effects on businesses. For example, extreme heat can damage roads, buildings, and transit infrastructure, and devastate agricultural industries. As a result, businesses may need to increase capital spending for maintenance and replacement of equipment and inventory. They may need to install sensors or other devices to measure how well their infrastructure, operations, crops, or livestock can withstand high temperatures. And they may even have to shift the geographies of their supply chains.

Drought can affect the availability, access, and pricing of water and food, and can increase costs for companies that rely on water for production or transportation. It can also hinder hydropower generation and the stability of agricultural production. Sea-level rise is one of the most significant longer-term risks, according to the framework.

“Unmitigated, its potential for destruction of coastal residential and commercial property is significant,” framework authors write, “as is the potential impact of forced or voluntary human migration and the impact on infrastructure, municipalities, and economic growth. Companies may need to adapt or relocate operations, at substantial cost.”

Wildfires, hurricanes, and flooding also disrupt business operations by damaging property or inventory, or by causing power outages or government-service shutdowns. The framework says that such events can keep customers away or prevent shipments or transport. Additionally, they may also contaminate soil and water, which could degrade consumer confidence in agricultural products and create consumer health risks.

Related Stories:

Proposed Bill to Require Companies to Disclose Climate Risk

Giant Investment Coalition Call for Climate Action From G20 Leaders

CalSTRS Teams Up with Pope Francis on Climate Action

Tags: , , ,

«