CIO, Executive Director Resign From Embattled Pennsylvania PSERS

Jim Grossman will stay on until May, while Glen Grell will leave at the end of February.

Jim Grossman

Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS) CIO Jim Grossman and Executive Director Glen Grell announced their retirements at a special board meeting Thursday morning.

Effective Dec. 9, Grossman will transition to the role of senior adviser and will assist in the transition to a new CIO until May 1, when he will officially retire. Grell will also become a senior adviser, effective Jan. 1, and will help with the transition to a new executive director until Feb. 28, when his retirement becomes effective.

Their resignations follow several months of controversy. The $72 billion pension fund, the largest in the state, revealed in March that a nine-year performance figure certified in December 2020 was inaccurate. In December, PSERS’ board of trustees had been told by its general investment consultant and another firm that its nine-year performance figure was 6.38%, which was just high enough to avoid the 6.36% threshold triggering additional contributions under state law.

However, when PSERS management informed the board in March that there were errors in the data used to perform the calculation, and a review of all performance data was ordered, it was revealed that the actual nine-year performance fell short of the 6.36% target. This meant that school employees, as well as taxpayers, had to contribute more to the pension fund.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The controversy drew the attention of the FBI, which reportedly is investigating whether kickbacks and bribes were involved in the misstatement of its 2020 investment performance. And in June, six of the board’s 15 members called for the removal of Grossman and Grell as a result of the financial reporting error.

“As fiduciaries possessing a duty of loyalty to the beneficiaries of the retirement fund, it is our intention to request the immediate termination and replacement of the executive director and chief investment officer,” read a letter to Board Chairman Christopher SantaMaria. However, a few days later, the board members withdrew their request.

According to Pennsylvania PSERS, the pension fund’s total net assets grew to $72 billion from $49 billion under Grossman’s tenure.

“Jim’s guidance and leadership have been important over the last several years as the fund has continued to recover from the great financial crisis and improve its funding status,” the pension fund said in a statement. “He has been responsible for managing and administering the investment program, advising the board in the development of an asset allocation policy, and leading the investment office. … The PSERS Board would like to thank Jim for his years of service to PSERS’ members and annuitants and wishes him well in his future endeavors.”

Grell, who turns 65 at the end of December, has been executive director since 2015. Before that, he had served as the state representative for the 87th district in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives since 2004.

“Glen has been a fierce advocate for fully funding PSERS, working with members of the General Assembly and the governor’s office to secure 100% of the annual required contribution each year since 2016,” Pennsylvania PSERS said in a statement. “Under Glen’s leadership, the agency has become more user friendly, allowing PSERS members to complete transactions through the member self-service portal.”

The fund said Verus Advisory Inc. will continue in its role of providing investment oversight and supervisory services. PSERS also said it has launched a search for a new CIO and executive director, effective immediately.

Related Stories:

Six Pennsylvania PSERS Trustees Seek Termination of Executive Director, CIO

FBI Said to Seek Evidence of Kickbacks, Bribery at Pennsylvania PSERS

Pennsylvania PSERS Hires Law Firms to Probe Reporting Error

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Two Newly Hatched EV Makers, Rivian and Lucid, Surge to Ford and GM’s Level

They exceed or nudge close to the legacy automakers’ market caps. Shades of Tesla.


Fledgling electric vehicle (EV) makers have seen their shares tearing up the track lately—to the point they have surpassed or are close to traditional car companies. All this is a testimony to 2021’s scorching initial public offering (IPO) mania and the dominance of tech-oriented stocks, analysts say. Small wonder that the duo’s stocks took a breather this morning and flagged after their quick ascents.

Rivian Automotive, which went public last week, has seen its market cap vault to $130 billion—which is more than that of US legacy auto giants General Motors ($94 billion) and Ford Motor ($79 billion). Rivian is up 65% since its debut Nov. 9. This morning, the stock slipped back 9%.

Another newbie EV manufacturer, Lucid Group, sports an $86 billion market value. The stock has doubled since it went public in July via a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) called Churchill Capital IV. Lucid’s stock fell today by a similar amount to Rivian’s.

Neither company is profitable, and they both have generated only a relative handful of cars.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

This all is reminiscent of Tesla, the original EV tyro. Elon Musk’s company now boasts a whopping $1.1 trillion market cap, and the stock has leaped 126% over the past 12 months. Tesla (IPO: 2010) at last is churning our autos and even has turned a profit. Although it’s a slender one, compared to its lofty share price: Its price/earnings ratio (P/E) is a towering 350. But hey, Tesla is now a member of the S&P 500, a validation of its arrival if ever there was one.

«