Catastrophe Bonds Attract Scrutiny in Wake of Hurricane

The monitoring of Hurricane Irene's impact on catastrophe bonds continues.

(August 29, 2011) — The catastrophe bond sector — in which insurers transfer risks associated with natural disasters to capital markets investors — has attracted heightened attention in the wake of Hurricane Irene.

AIR Worldwide, a catastrophe-risk modeling firm, estimated that insured losses in the Caribbean from Irene have already reached between $500 million and $1.1 billion, the Wall Street Journal reported.

On Friday, as the storm was approaching the East Coast, ratings agency Standard & Poor’s said in a statement: “Given the uncertainty of where the hurricane ultimately makes landfall, its subsequent course, and the resulting covered losses, we will not take any rating actions until after the event has passed through the US.”

According to Willis Capital Markets & Advisory, the cat bond sector is exposed to nearly 70% of US hurricane risk, Reuters reported. Bill Dubinsky, managing director of the firm, said last week that as reports from weather forecasters emerged on Hurricane Irene’s intensity, some investors are attempting to “trade in and out of bonds as well as using the parallel Live Cat market to rebalance their positions.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Catastrophe bonds have also attracted heightened interest from pension funds, exemplified by Europe’s second-biggest insurer revealing in March that its funds investing in catastrophic bonds may more than triple. Axa said that its funds investing in cat bonds and other insurance-linked securities may balloon as insurers manage their exposure to natural disasters by transferring potential losses to investment funds. Christophe Fritsch, head of insurance-linked securities at Axa Investment Managers, the asset-management unit of Paris-based Axa, told Global Pensions that he has witnessed a spike in the number of meetings he has had with chief investment officers of pension funds, which will likely result in higher investments from those funds. Fritsch said he expects demand from pension funds will drive new issuance of cat bonds up to $7 billion this year.

In February, Swiss Re said it obtained $350 million in protection through the Successor X Ltd. catastrophe bond program, representing the fourth time the reinsurer has used the program to transfer risks covering North Atlantic hurricane and California earthquakes. Swiss Re noted that the transaction adds an additional $305 million of notes to cover itself against hurricane losses in some US. states and Puerto Rico and California earthquakes until December 2014.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Ohio Pensions: Federal Rule Denies Us Rightful Fannie Payment

Two Ohio public pensions are asking a judge to disallow federal agency rules that would potentially subordinate their claims in a lawsuit against Fannie Mae.

(August 28, 2011) — Two Ohio pension funds have asked a federal judge to disallow a federal agency rule that would potentially limit the amount they could eventually receive for suing Fannie Mae, the massive insurer of mortgage debt.

According to the lawsuit, rules set by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) would allow some creditors — even, potentially, Fannie Mae’s own corporate officers — to be paid for unsecured claims before the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, the pension funds filing the suit. “If Fannie Mae’s officers — the very individuals responsible for the fraud — sued the company to recover their attorney’s fees, their claims would receive priority over plaintiffs’ valid securities fraud claims,” the two pensions allege in the lawsuit.

The FHFA is the federal agency tasked with sorting out claims against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are now under government control following severe stress in 2008. The claim-priority rules — which took effect in late July, and subordinate certain financial claims on the two mortgage agencies — are a violation both of the U.S. Constitution and the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, according to the pension funds. This is because FHFA’s acting director, Edward DeMarco, has acted in his capacity without confirmation for two years.

The original claims against Fannie Mae stem from alleged securities fraud; the two Ohio funds are the lead plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed in 2004 over what they claim are inflated earnings.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The case is: Ohio Public Employees Retirement System v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, 11-cv-01543, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia.



<p>To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editors of this story: Kip McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a> </p>

«