Canadian Defined Benefit Plans Have Worst Quarter in 12 Years

RBC and Northern Trust report plans lost 7.1%, the steepest drop since 2008.

Canadian defined benefit pension plans saw their sharpest quarterly decline since 2008 due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as both the RBC Investor & Treasury Services All Plan Universe and the Northern Trust Canada Universe posted losses of 7.1% during the first quarter of the year.

Despite the steep drop, it was “a modest decline in light of the unprecedented conditions,” Katie Pries, CEO of Northern Trust Canada, said in a statement. “In a volatile market riddled with fear, uncertainty, and unpredictability, Canadian pension plan sponsors navigated through uncharted territory, seeking a path to safety.”

The MSCI World Index tumbled 13.3% during the quarter, with growth stocks considerably outperforming value stocks. All economic sectors saw negative returns, with the energy sector faring the worst, while information technology (IT) performed the best. Because the Canadian dollar weakened against the US dollar during the quarter, plans with unhedged exposure to non-Canadian equities were somewhat sheltered from local currency losses, according to RBC.

Canadian equities as represented by the S&P/TSX Composite Index plummeted 20.9% during the quarter, erasing the annual gains from all of last year and significantly underperforming the global market. While the effects of the pandemic were primarily to blame for this, the dispute over the natural gas pipeline and the Russia-Saudi Arabia oil price war were also contributing factors.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

US equities fell 11.7% in Canadian dollars, as international developed markets as tracked by the MSCI EAFE Index ended the quarter down 15.2%, while the MSCI Emerging Markets index, which was hurt by both the pandemic and a strong US dollar, lost 16.1% during the quarter.

The FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index returned 1.6% during the first quarter, which provided the plans some safety from losses in the equity markets. After the Bank of Canada cut interest rates, the yield curve steepened, and short-term bonds outperformed long-term bonds. Federal bonds outperformed provincial and corporate bonds, and mid-term bonds outpaced both short- and long-term bonds.

In search of a safe haven from the falling markets, investors sold off riskier investments and turned toward government bonds as the FTSE Canada High Yield Index lost 9.0%, and the FTSE Canada Federal Bond index returned 5.1% during the quarter.

“It has been an exceptionally difficult period for Canadian pension plans to navigate, as the markets have been experiencing an unprecedented amount of volatility across asset classes,” David Linds, RBC’s head of Canadian Asset Servicing, said in a statement.

“However, the substantial monetary and fiscal policy response from governments across the globe gives us room for optimism. While it’s difficult to speculate on what may happen over the short term, we hope these measures will lead to some reawakening of our economic growth in the near future.”

Related Stories:

Canadian DB Plans Rebound in 2019, Return 14%

For Strength in Unification, Canadian Leader Calls for Regional Pensions to Pool Investments

Canadian Pooled Funds Return 15.8% in 2019

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Judges Reject Dallas Retirees’ Push to Restore Lump-Sum Payouts

Federal appeals court ruling is boon to ailing police and firefighters’ pension system.

The Dallas Police and Fire Pension System won a federal court victory against retired police officers who wanted the plan to continue its disbanded lump-sum payouts.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals  ruled that the retirees don’t have a constitutionally protected property interest in a particular means of receiving their benefits.

Long teetering on insolvency, the $2.3 billion pension program is funded at just 48.1%, as of its last financial filing covering to year-end 2018. Previously, the Texas Supreme Court had rejected the lawsuit, brought using a similar argument related to the state’s constitution.

If the legal action had been successful, opponents argued, it would have sped up the plan’s insolvency, which is projected to take place within 10 years as more beneficiaries retire. Permitting retirees to remove large chunks of the plan’s assets would more swiftly deplete its resources.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The plaintiffs contended that the “threatened harm” to retired personnel  “outweighs the harm that a preliminary injunction would inflict” on the pension system. Not having access to the money harms retirees, who figure the sums into their monthly budgets, the suit alleged.

The controversy revolves around a feature of the pension system called the Deferred Retirement Option Plan, or DROP. This let police officers and firefighters amass large lump sums—in some instances, millions of dollars that they could get in retirement in addition to a monthly benefit check.

The original idea was to make this a retention perk that permitted officers and firefighters to retire on paper while they actually kept working as their pension payments went to feed their DROP accounts.

But so much was pouring out of the DROP program, and into the pockets of retirees who feared a city bankruptcy, that a law was passed in 2017 that limited how much they can withdraw. That prompted the retirees’ lawsuit.

Related Stories:

Dallas Police and Fire Wins Court Ruling on Post-Retirement Income

How Dallas Police and Fire Plans to Revitalize Its Portfolio

Dallas Pension Fund Sues Actuary for Malpractice

Tags: , , , , ,

«