CalSTRS Revamps ESG Guidelines

The new guidance is meant to help the pension system engage companies in its portfolio where it can have the most impact.

The investment committee of the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) has approved new environmental, social, and governance (ESG) guidelines aimed at picking companies for engagement where CalSTRS can make a difference by influencing change and driving the stock price up.

The new policy approved at the pension plan’s January 30 investment committee meeting is meant to help CalSTRS determine which of the thousands of companies in the pension system’s $248 billion global equity portfolio should be the subject of CalSTRS engagement.

The new plan requires staff to not only evaluate CalSTRS’ ability to influence change at companies in its portfolio that it is selecting for engagement, but also assess the pension plan’s ability to deliver measurable outcomes.

The pension plan also approved a new investment principle aimed at expanding its ESG investment policy.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The new principle requires CalSTRS investment staff to consider investment risks associated with climate change.

The pension plan already requires investment staff to look beyond traditional financial metrics to assess material ESG factors in the investment process for every asset class.

However, that ESG principle does not mention climate change.

The new climate change investment belief also states that CalSTRS “recognizes the critical role that carbon pricing frameworks may play in integrating the cost of common emissions into the global economy to accelerate an orderly-low carbon transition.”

CalSTRS now has nine investment principles. Other CalSTRS investment principles detail the benefits of a diversified portfolio and the need to be an active investor when there are market opportunities.

CalSTRS Chief Investment Officer Chris Ailman told the investment committee at the January 30 meeting that as members of the committee change over the next decade, the CalSTRS investment principles will help guide them.

“And it tells very clear instructions to the investment staff that what you’re doing better be in connection to these,” he said.

While much of CalSTRS’ engagement efforts are done behind the scenes, the pension plan cited last month its work as the lead investor working with public company Duke Energy. CalSTRS said its efforts have led the company to commit to a 50% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2050.

It also cited its efforts to convince vehicle manufacturer Volkswagen to become climate neutral by 2050 and launch 28 electric vehicle models by 2028.

The pension plan has been revamping its ESG program under the direction of Kirsty Jenkinson, who took over sustainability and corporate governance initiatives in January 2019. Jenkinson replaced CalSTRS long-term ESG director Anne Sheehan, who retired.

Jenkinson told the investment committee at the January 30 meeting that the new guidelines will give investment staff enhanced direction to pick which corporate engagements to take on. “We have a system that we can go through to determine, do we respond? Do we not respond?”

The revamp of CalSTRS’ engagement efforts and the new climate change principle comes as environmental critics have become more vocal in demanding that the pension plan divest of fossil fuel investments.

Drenched in fake oil and riding an “oil tanker” float, California school children marched with California teachers and retirees to CalSTRS headquarters before the investment committee meeting on January 30 to protest the mega-fund’s refusal to divest of its $6 billion fossil fuel portfolio.

The protesters have also been encouraging school children to attend CalSTRS meetings since last May to voice their displeasure at CalSTRS’ policy of engaging with fossil fuel companies instead of divesting. The children, along with adult environmentalists, also slammed the investment committee at the January meeting.

“I’ve never heard the word engagement except for when people get married,” Sujeith, a sixth grader from Oakland told the investment committee. “So you’re telling me you want to be in a relationship with fossil fuel companies? What have they done other than pollute the planet? That sounds like a toxic relationship.”

Fossil Free California executive director Vanessa Warheit, in a statement to CIO, said her organization appreciated CalSTRS’ efforts to pass the new climate change investment principle.

“But engaging with the energy sector—which is currently 100% comprised of fossil fuel companies—is a waste of staff time and resources,” she said.

CalSTRS investment committee members said at the meeting that they don’t think the environmental advocates are aware of all the efforts they are making as part of their engagement efforts with fossil fuel companies.

Ailman has said that divestment from fossil fuel companies would deprive CalSTRS of a seat at the table to influence sustainability efforts.

While energy stocks have been the worst-performing sector in the S&P 500 over the past decade, pension plan officials say the sector is important for the pension plan to maintain a diversified equity portfolio.

Many pension organizations see energy stocks as a hedge in case of an inflationary spiral.

Related Stories:

CalSTRS Rejects Fossil Fuel Divestment

CalSTRS Says SEC Proposal Weakens Corporate Accountability

CalSTRS Seeks to Join Lawsuit to Reform Facebook Governance

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Georgia Teachers Win Big in Bill Meant to Help Retirement System’s Insolvency Woes

Legislation mandating stiff rules on state educators is scaled back after consistent opposition.

A bill aimed at curbing the Georgia Teachers’ Retirement System’s insolvency problems has been scaled back after consistent criticism from the state’s educators.

House Bill 109 pegged teachers with a catalogue of new rules requiring them to work longer hours, receive lower cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) to their benefit payments, and potentially contribute more of their salaries towards the fund during their working years, according to The Atlanta Journal Constitution. The pension is approximately 80% funded.

The mandates received heavy criticism from around the state, causing thousands of emails to be sent to the state legislature intended to dissuade its approach.

House Retirement Chairman Tommy Benton instead cited a preference to change the way COLAs are calculated in the system. Today, beneficiaries receive an annual COLA increase of 1.5% twice per year. Instead, Benton has proposed changing this calculation to 3% once a year, an effort intended to mitigate the compounding effects of the current calculation and save the retirement system approximately $17 million per year, according to local news outlet News Channel 9.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Benton alleges that a majority of the emails sent to legislators in opposition of the bill were sent by individuals who did not fully understand the law’s internal mechanisms.

The emails were a “scare tactic to get retired educators and current educators to write their representative. It is obvious the people who wrote the emails, most of them, had no idea what was in the bill, they just wrote what they were told to write,” AJC reported.

“I don’t know how many I got,” said Benton, himself a retired educator. “I deleted every one of them.”

Additionally, educators would be prohibited from using their sick days to boost their pension in the proposed legislation, a move that could add $1,000 or more a year to their benefit payments once they retire, News Channel 9 reported.

In 2019, the employee contribution rate in Georgia was 6% and the employer contribution rate was 20.9%. Investment returns provide the most amount of funding for the pension, but forecasted market losses and demographic changes have contributed to over 70% of the unfunded accrued liability for the retirement system. The fund has a projected $25 billion in unfunded accrued liability, out of its $71 billion in assets.

Benton argued that the pension’s future is volatile and now is the time to make changes to the system. It’s not in any dire circumstances at the moment, being approximately 80% funded, but there are projected risks to the economy in the long run.

Legislators previously proposed equalizing the COLAs to the inflation rate, but opponents said the current 3% in adjustments is contracted to the pension’s beneficiaries and such changes would violate it.

Related Stories:

SEC Wants to Protect Teachers, Military Members from Getting Duped

Texas Teachers System Returns 6.4%, Misses Benchmark

Georgia County Manager Charged with Pension Fraud

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«