CalPERS Efficiency Drive Captures Nearly $1 Billion in Savings

Aiming to increase efficiency while lowering waste and redundancy, the nation's largest public pension fund has captured $963 million in cost savings in 2010, with an additional $287 million of savings targeted in 2011.

(May 25, 2011) — A staff report recently presented to the board of the more than $236 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) shows that the fund generated $963 million in cost savings in 2010 by increasing operational efficiency while reducing waste and redundancy.

“In recognition of challenging financial circumstances, we are aggressively looking at ways to reduce our operating expenses,” said CalPERS Chief Executive Officer Anne Stausboll in a statement. “Through innovations in our health benefits program, lower investment management fees, and other operational efficiencies, we were able to generate nearly $1 billion in cost savings last year. We expect to save another $287 million in the current year.”

The report shows that the CalPERS Investment Office reduced operational costs by $357 million in 2010, fueled by reductions in management fees charged by investment partners and managers. Additional efficiencies in investment operations are expected to produce $4.6 million in savings in 2011, the report showed.

Questions and skepticism about overly high and undeserved management fees have also gained attention in a February UK-based report by consultant Lane Clark & Peacock (LCP). The study, based on fund managers overseeing 80% of UK pension scheme assets showed that in the year to September 30, market performance alone accounted for an 11% increase in management fees. The report claimed returns were largely fueled by strong markets as opposed to superior skills, reflecting a misalignment over fees.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“Because assets grew as markets went up, managers have made a lot more in fees, even if actually they did not perform very well for their clients,’ said report author Mark Nicoll, who is also a partner at Lane Clark and Peacock. “Our research demonstrates that when markets rise, investment managers generally get paid higher fees even if they haven’t added any value. In our experience, pension scheme trustees will be better served by negotiating sensibly structured performance-related fees.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Study: Institutional Investors Seek ETFs

While ETFs encompass a fraction of institutional investor portfolios, a burgeoning number of these institutions plan to up their use of these investing instruments in the future.

(May 24, 2011) — A new Greenwich Associates study reveals that institutional investors are increasingly bullish on using exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in their portfolios.

“Perhaps even more telling than those findings is the fact that not a single asset manager reported plans to cut ETF allocations in the coming two years, and less than one in 10 institutional funds plan to reduce allocations to ETFs in that period,” says Greenwich Associates consultant Andrew McCollum.

According to the firm, nearly one-half of the asset management firms and one-third of the institutional funds taking part in the Greenwich Associates study of current institutional ETF users plan to increase the share of portfolio assets that they invest in ETFs over the next two years.

Furthermore, the study shows that among asset managers, 53% say that ETFs are used to gain active exposure to international equities and 43% use ETFs for active exposure to domestic equities. “These respondents are not necessarily using actively managed ETFs, but rather use passive ETFs to gain a tactical active exposure,” the study asserts. Meanwhile, institutional funds are less likely to view ETFs as an instrument to gain active exposure, with 23% and 15% using ETFs to gain a tactical active exposure to domestic and international equities, respectively.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Liquidity has emerged as the most important factor for both asset managers and institutional funds when it comes to selecting an ETF provider, the report by Greenwich Associates reveals. Following liquidity, institutional funds focus on providers’ expense ratios and tracking errors, followed by the strength and reputation of the fund company behind the funds, as well as the track record of the fund itself.

The study was conducted by Greenwich Associates and sponsored by BlackRock and was based on interviews with 45 institutional funds — including corporate pensions, public pensions, and endowments and foundations — and 25 large asset management firms in the United States collectively overseeing roughly $7.5 trillion.

In a recent interview with BlackRock’s Deborah Fuhr, she noted that she has witnessed heightened scrutiny of exchange-traded products due to ballooning interest among institutional investors, adding that regulators have enhanced their scrutiny over these products. “Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have grown very quickly relative to other products, especially outside the United States, which has driven the analysis that has been undertaken by regulators,” Fuhr told aiCIO, referring to recent warnings over the increasing complexity of exchange-traded products by the Financial Stability Board, the International Monetary Fund, and the Board of International Settlements. “ETFs have risen in popularity within the retail and institutional sectors, so I think the concern is to make sure regulators understand the products that have been growing and evolving very quickly.”

According to Fuhr, the legacy of Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy and of the financial crisis more broadly was that regulators need to take a closer look at the unexpected. “Any product that has grown significantly is important,” she said, noting that while it took mutual funds roughly 66 years to break through $1 trillion in the United States, the growth in ETF assets in the US reached $1 trillion in only 18 years.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«