California Governor Announces Pension Overhaul

California Governor Jerry Brown has proposed sweeping rollbacks to public employee pension benefits in California.

(October 27, 2011) — California Gov. Jerry Brown is seeking massive pension cuts, which the administration estimates would save about $900 million annually.

Some of the changes the governor has proposed include raising the retirement age to 67 for new employees who are not public safety workers and requiring state and local employees to pay more toward their retirement and health care, according to a draft of the plan obtained by the the Associated Press.

“It’s time to fix our pension systems so that they are fair and sustainable over a long time horizon,” Brown said in a prepared statement to the AP. “My plan raises the retirement age and bans abusive practices…while mandating that public employees pay an equal share of pension costs.” The news service reported that the governor is expected to end so-called pension “spiking,” which allows employees to boost their payouts by including overtime and other benefits, while also ending the practice of buying service credits.

Earlier this month, Brown signed legislation that strengthened the chief financial officer position at the $217.1 billion Sacramento-based California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). The legislation will become law on January 1, 2012, the statement from the fund revealed. “These new laws allow CalPERS to continue to apply newer and higher standards of accountability, integrity, and openness to ensure public trust in our institution,” Anne Stausboll, CalPERS CEO, said in a statement. Furthermore, the legislation will encourage the formation of timelines for when board members and some staff members at both CalPERS and CalSTRS can move to certain other jobs, Stausboll explained.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

In addition, as outlined in the release, the pension legislation “prohibits CalPERS and CalSTRS Board Members and executive employees from representing another entity before the pension funds to influence specified actions for a period of four years after leaving service.” Furthermore, the legislation prohibits those individuals from aiding, advising, consulting with, or assisting a business entity for two years after leaving service, in obtaining the award of, or in negotiating, a contract or contract amendment with CalPERS or CalSTRS. Among the new restrictions board members and staff at CalPERS and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) are subject to is also a 10-year moratorium on the acceptance of jobs as placement agents.

Click here to read the California governor’s “Twelve Point Pension Reform Plan.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Mercer: In the Wake of Interest Rate Lows, Pension Plan Sponsors Foresee Soaring Contributions

A new analysis by Mercer has shown that the funded status for most pension plans is anticipated to drop significantly with plan sponsors facing sharply higher contributions for 2011 and beyond.

(October 27, 2011) — Pension plan sponsors are anticipating soaring 2011 contributions as interest rates hit record lows, a new analysis by Mercer reveals.

“Falling interest rates have created an environment in which plan sponsors that have taken steps to de-risk — incorporating a liability-driven investing approach — have fared better than those who haven’t,” Craig Rosenthal, a partner in Mercer’s retirement, risk and finance business, tells aiCIO. Rosenthal describes the current market environment as a ‘pension perfect storm,’ characterized by declines in asset values, driven mainly by equities, coupled with growing liabilities due to falling interest rates. Amid the turbulent environment, the trajectory for cash contributions continues to point skyward, according to Rosenthal. “These dramatically increasing contributions could drive some employers out of the pension system,” he says.

In anticipation of a worsening pension perfect storm, Rosenthal adds that many of Mercer’s clients with the luxury of available cash have made additional voluntary contributions for the 2010 plan year so that their 2011 funded ratios would avoid further threshold tests and scrutiny, as mandated by the Pension Protection Act (PPA).

According to the consulting firm, the funded status for most pensions is anticipated to drop significantly in the wake of higher expected contributions for 2011, with about 50% of surveyed plans needing 2010 contributions in excess of the minimum required amount to prevent 2011 funded ratios from falling below 80%. This would potentially trigger benefit restrictions and onerous “at risk” funding rules, the consulting firm reveals.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Low interest rates have been driven largely by US economic policy, and Mercer notes that “the full effects of this one-two punch won’t be fully felt until 2012 and beyond.” Huge and continuing cash calls, the slow economic recovery, and big potential increases in Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) premiums under consideration in Congress could place many plan sponsors in a difficult position, the firm states in a release, adding that without changes to pension funding rules, the funded status for many plans in 2011 and subsequent years will likely continue to decline significantly, with the following implications:

1) Funded ratios fall

2) Required contributions soar

3) Credit balances wither

4) Cash contributions skyrocket – up eightfold in just two years

5) Additional contribution increases expected in 2012

Mercer’s study was based on an analysis of 849 private-sector single-employer plans subject to the PPA, with more than $191 billion in combined assets as of January 1, 2010, and covering more than 4 million participants.

The consulting firm’s analysis follows a research paper published in August by UBS’s Francois Pellerin, which showed that between 2003 and 2007, the funded status of plans in the US ballooned from 77% to 96%. According to Pellerin, a heightened level of contributions made by plan sponsors — fueled by the PPA — largely drove the increase – highlighting a prevalent misperception among sponsors that a pure increase in equities got them out of their rut, when the real driver was contributions.

“In analyzing the liabilities of 500 publically-traded companies with the highest pension exposure, I found that on average, the pension plan was 46% of the size of the company,” Pellerin notes, adding that “liability-driven investment has flourished to control volatility so that plan sponsors can worry about what they’re good at – whether its building cars, making widgets, or whatnot.” Thus, once a plan reaches a funded status it deems appropriate, it should be heavily committed to a de-risking program, the paper claims.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«