Cali Treasurer Urges Transparent Election Spending by CalPERS, CalSTRS‎

California Treasurer Bill Lockyer has sent letters to the state’s public pension funds to develop policies for full disclosure of corporate political spending.

(June 2, 2011) — The nation’s two largest public pension funds — the $235.2 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the $155.4 billion California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) — have been urged to develop policies for full disclosure of corporate political spending.

The request for providing transparency in political spending by the companies in which the funds invest comes from a request by Bill Lockyer, California’s state treasurer and a trustee of both retirement systems. Lockyer has also called for for oversight of corporate political spending by companies’ boards of directors.

“Studies have shown a negative link between a company’s political spending and the resulting value of the firm,”Lockyer said in a statement. “As fiduciaries, it’s our duty to ensure investors have the information they need to accurately evaluate a firm’s profitability and long-term sustainability.” Thus, he noted that shareholders such as pension funds should be able to count on a company’s board of directors to diligently oversee campaign spending policies and practices to make sure they serve the best interests of the company and investors.

The US Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, issued Jan. 21, “opened the floodgates to unlimited corporate spending in political campaigns,” Lockyer said.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

In response to the letters, CalPERS spokesman Clark McKinley wrote in an email: “While we don’t list the political contribution disclosure issue in our US corporate governance principles, the Council of Institutional Investors principles do address it…We also have consistently voted to support proxy proposals to have companies disclose political contributions.” Meanwhile, CalSTRS board’s corporate governance committee is planning on discussing the political spending disclosure at its meeting on Thursday.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Australian ETF Industry Should Devote Attention to Institutions, Russell Says

Russell Investments has asserted that the exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry in Australia should focus its attention on institutional investors.

(June 2, 2011) — The Australian exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry should focus on institutional investors, says Russell Investments.

While retail use of ETFs has boomed in Australia, institutional use of the investment vehicles has not caught up to speed, contrasting with the way the ETF market has developed in Europe and the United States. Russell commissioned Deloitte Actuaries & Consultants to undertake interviews with 20 institutions that directly manage or advise more than 40% of Australian funds under management in a bid to discover their views on ETFs.

The study finds that 30% of institutions will consider using ETFs in the future in a significant way, with education and innovation being key to evolution of institutional ETF market. The report follows Russell’s launch of a new research report, “Digging Deeper: Institutional ETF investing in Australia,” which looks at how Australian institutions are using ETFs and plan to use them in the future.

Despite the growing popularity of ETFs, the local market is still in its infancy. “While some institutions initially perceived ETFs as a retail solution, the research found that the majority of institutions use ETFs in small way,” says Amanda Skelly, director ETFs at Russell Investments, in the report. “This is a positive sign for the industry although there is still a lot more we could do to help drive growth through product innovation and education.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Furthermore, Russell’s research notes that many larger institutions have also considered more innovative uses of ETFs in non-core parts of their business or for portfolios constructed for specific clients. “As institutions continue to evolve to address specific customer needs, be it managing pension assets differently, expanding the types of exposures they are seeking to access or taking a more macro approach to investing, ETFs can play a role. They should be considered alongside all other types of investment vehicles,” Skelly asserts. Meanwhile, for smaller institutions, Skelly notes that comfort with existing investment structures and processes and limited knowledge of ETFs have been the main barriers to acceptance.

Last week, a report by Greenwich Associates — based on interviews with 45 institutional funds, including corporate pensions, public pensions, and endowments and foundations, and 25 large asset management firms in the US collectively overseeing roughly $7.5 trillion — revealed that institutional investors are increasingly bullish on using ETFs in their portfolios. “Perhaps even more telling than those findings is the fact that not a single asset manager reported plans to cut ETF allocations in the coming two years, and less than one in 10 institutional funds plan to reduce allocations to ETFs in that period,” says Greenwich Associates consultant Andrew McCollum.

According to the firm, nearly one-half of the asset management firms and one-third of the institutional funds taking part in the Greenwich Associates study of current institutional ETF users plan to increase the share of portfolio assets that they invest in ETFs over the next two years.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«