Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Suffers Profit Drop in 3Q, Derivatives to Blame

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has suffered a 24% decline in its third-quarter profits.

(November 6, 2011) — Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has suffered a profit decline of 24% to $2.28 billion in the third quarter, largely as a result of losses tied to derivative bets.

Net income dropped to $2.28 billion, or $1,380 a share, from $2.99 billion, or $1,814, a year earlier. Revenue slid to $33.7 billion from $36.3 billion last year. Operating profit, on the other hand, increased 37% to $2,309 per share, beating estimates.

The derivatives portfolio produced a $1.59 billion quarterly loss, compared with a loss of $95 million a year earlier. The declines stemmed partly from large drops in Wells Fargo & Co., American Express Co., and Buffett’s equity-derivative bets, Bloomberg earlier reported. Berkshire is the largest shareholder in Wells-Fargo, with a stake totaling about 6.7%. With a roughly 13% stake, Berkshire is also a top shareholder in American Express, which dropped approximately 13% in the period.

According to Berkshire Hathaway’s financial statements, the firm spent nearly $7 billion in equities, and spent $17.9 million on buybacks.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Things may soon turn up for Buffett, based on a recent survey by Northern Trust, which concluded that while institutional investment managers have an increasingly dismal outlook on economic growth in the United States, many still see opportunities in the US equity markets. The third quarter 2011 Northern Trust Global Advisors (NTGA) manager survey showed that a total of 75% of managers believe US equities are undervalued — US large cap equities were the highest ranked asset class, while technology was the highest ranked sector in the third quarter.

“After what was clearly an incredibly challenging quarter, our managers seem to be saying that although they see plenty of opportunities in the market at current valuations, it’s buyer beware given the considerable headwinds that may be coming our way.” said Christopher Vella, Chief Investment Officer for NTGA, the multi-manager business of Northern Trust.

The study showed that the European debt crisis is perceived to be the biggest risk to equity markets in the next six months. A total of 63% of managers anticipate the European debt crisis will spill over to other areas of the market.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Citi Wins Over Abu Dhabi in Arbitration Case on $7.5B Investment

Citigroup has won its arbitration case over Abu Dhabi’s $7.5 billion investment in the bank.

(November 5, 2011) — Citigroup, the third-biggest bank in the United States, has won its case against the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA). 

In a regulatory filing released yesterday, Citigroup revealed that an arbitration panel awarded in its favor on all claims made by ADIA in connection with its $7.5 billion investment in the bank, which the sovereign wealth fund had aimed to discard. 

“On October 14, 2011, an arbitration panel issued a final award and statement of reasons finding in favor of Citigroup on all claims asserted by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) in connection with its $7.5 billion investment in Citigroup,” the regulatory filing stated. 

The sovereign wealth fund claimed in late 2009 that its November 2007 investment of $7.5 billion into Citigroup was based on fraudulent statements by the New York City-based bank. At the time, Citigroup battled record losses tied to subprime mortgages. If the investment was unable to be canceled, the Abu Dhabi fund had sought $4 billion in damages. Meanwhile, the bank had asserted that the suit lacked merit, promising to “vigorously” defend itself. 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Citigroup is not the only bank to have encountered scrutiny and disapproval in the aftermath of the financial crisis — largely in connection with mortgage-backed securities. In June, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that JP Morgan would pay $153 million to settle charges of allegedly selling $1.1 billion in mortgage-backed securities that were designed to fail. Following the financial crisis and housing collapse, countless other cases of alleged fraud and acts of misleading investors among the nation’s largest banks have been brought to light. Similar to suits against Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, and other US financial institutions, the case against JP Morgan encompassed an accusation that a hedge fund was seminally involved in the selection of the underlying collateral in the portfolio while simultaneously betting against it with a short position.

The US regulator asserted that as the housing market crumbled in March and April 2007, JP Morgan executives urged the marketing of Squared CDO 2007-1, a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) linked to a collection of residential mortgages, without informing investors that a hedge fund — Magnetar Capital — helped select the assets in the CDO portfolio and had a short position in more than half of those assets. Consequently, the hedge fund was positioned to benefit if the CDO assets it was selecting for the portfolio defaulted.

In the case of Citigroup, its recent regulatory filing concludes: “…with respect to assertions that certain Citigroup affiliates in its Consumer mortgage…business breached representations and warranties made in connection with mortgage loans placed into securitization trusts, Citigroup has experienced, and may continue to experience in the future, an increase in the level of inquiries relating to these securitizations, particularly requests for loan files, among other matters, from trustees of securitization trusts and others. These inquiries may or may not lead to actual demands for repurchase of the affected mortgage loans; however, given the continued increased focus on mortgage-related matters, as well as the increasing level of litigation and regulatory activity relating to mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, not just for Citigroup but for the industry as a whole, these inquiries and/or repurchase demands may result in litigation.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«