Brown Leads Ivies for Third Year in a Row, as Columbia, Harvard Lag Behind

Brown University’s endowment returns have topped its Ivy League rivals for the third straight year, while the Columbia University and Harvard University endowments find themselves lagging behind their rivals despite earning historic returns of more than 30% each for fiscal year 2021.

Princeton University, which is the only Ivy League school that hasn’t yet reported its 2021 endowment performance, said it will announce results later this fall.

Brown’s 51.5% return cruised past the other Ivies, beating out the next highest performance by 5 percentage points and raising the fund’s market value to $6.9 billion from $4.7 billion at the end of fiscal year 2020.

Brown was followed by Dartmouth College’s endowment, which reported a return of 46.5% for the fiscal year that ended June 30, to raise its portfolio’s market value to $8.5 billion from $6 billion last year. The endowment also reported annualized returns of 12.8% over the past 10 years.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

Cornell University followed Dartmouth, returning 41.9% to boost its total asset value to $10 billion from $7.2 billion in 2020—its largest gain in more than three decades. Close behind was the University of Pennsylvania’s endowment, which generated an investment return of 41.1% for the fiscal year, growing its portfolio’s assets by $5.6 billion during the fiscal year to $20.5 billion.

Yale’s endowment was next, reporting a 40.2% investment return net of fees, to earn more than $12 billion in gains and rise to $42.3 billion. And pulling up the rear were Harvard and Columbia’s endowments, which returned 33.6% and 32.3%, respectively.

Harvard lifted its market value to $53.2 billion, an increase of $11.3 billion from the previous fiscal year, and the largest sum in its history, while the market value of Columbia’s portfolio increased to $14.35 billion, from $11.3 billion last year. The two schools also fell behind non-Ivy League rivals Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Stanford University, whose endowments returned 55.5% and 40.1%, respectively for fiscal year 2021. MIT’s performance raised its asset value by $9 billion to $27.4 billion, while Stanford’s returns translated to $12.1 billion in net investment gains as the value of the merged pool rose to $41.9 billion.

The median return for US college and university endowments for the year, as preliminarily reported by Cambridge Associates, is 33.4%.

Related Stories:

Why Brown Is Beating the Other Ivies

Harvard Management Company Completes Restructuring Plan a Year Early

Ivy League Endowments Underperform 60-40 Portfolio Again

Tags: Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth College, Endowments, Harvard, Ivy League, MIT, Princeton, Returns, Stanford, University of Pennsylvania, Yale

Credit Suisse Group has agreed to pay approximately $475 million to US and European financial regulators related to a Mozambican bond offering and loan that involved kickbacks to its bankers and bribes to corrupt Mozambique government officials.

The investment bank signed a financial settlement as part of a resolution agreement with the US Department of Justice (DOJ), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).

According to court documents and Credit Suisse’s own admissions, through its UK subsidiary, Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited (CSSEL), between 2013 and March 2017, the bank used US wires and the US financial system to defraud investors in securities related to Mozambican state-owned entity EMATUM. Mozambique created EMATUM to develop a state-owned tuna fishing project.

Authorities said Credit Suisse made numerous material misrepresentations and omissions relating to the use of loan proceeds, kickback payments to CSSEL bankers, and bribes to Mozambican officials. The offering materials Credit Suisse created and distributed to investors hid the underlying corruption and falsely disclosed that the proceeds would help develop Mozambique’s tuna fishing industry. Credit Suisse failed to disclose the full extent and nature of Mozambique’s indebtedness and the risk of default arising from these transactions, authorities said.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

A cease-and-desist order from the SEC order also said the scheme was aided by Credit Suisse’s deficient internal accounting controls, which failed to properly address significant and known risks concerning bribery.

Credit Suisse told investors the loan proceeds would only be used for the tuna fishing project; however the bank and its co-conspirators used US wires to divert loan proceeds from investors, which included approximately $50 million in kickbacks to CSSEL bankers and bribes totaling approximately $150 million to numerous senior-level Mozambican government officials.

“Credit Suisse provided investors with incomplete and misleading disclosures despite being uniquely positioned to understand the full extent of Mozambique’s mounting debt and serious risk of default based on its prior lending arrangements,” Anita Bandy, associate director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in a statement. “The massive offering fraud was also a consequence of the bank’s significant lapses in internal accounting controls and repeated failure to respond to corruption risks.”

Separately, a London-based subsidiary of Russia’s VTB Bank agreed to pay more than $6 million to settle SEC charges related to its role in misleading investors in a second 2016 Mozambique bond offering. According to the SEC’s cease-and-desist order against VTB, the two banks structured the second offering in a way that allowed investors to exchange their notes in an earlier bond offering for new sovereign bonds issued directly by the government of Mozambique.

However, the regulator found that the offering materials distributed and marketed by Credit Suisse and VTB Capital “failed to disclose the true nature of Mozambique’s debt and high risk of default” on the bonds. The SEC also said the offering materials failed to disclose Credit Suisse’s discovery that significant funds from the earlier offering had been diverted away from the intended use of proceeds that was disclosed to investors. Mozambique later defaulted on the financings after the full extent of “secret debt” was revealed.

Credit Suisse agreed to pay the SEC disgorgement and interest fees totaling more than $34 million and a penalty of $65 million. As part of coordinated resolutions, the DOJ imposed a $247 million criminal fine, with Credit Suisse paying, after crediting, $175 million, and Credit Suisse also agreed to pay over $200 million in a penalty as part of a settled action with the FCA.

VTB Capital consented to an SEC order finding that it violated negligence-based antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the findings, VTB Capital agreed to pay more than $2.4 million in disgorgement and interest along with a $4 million penalty.

Subscribe to a free PW Newsletter!