Boston Pension Claims It Was Taken Advantage of By State Street With FX

State Street continues to battle claims that it took advantage of pension schemes when providing foreign-currency trading services in recent years.

(September 21, 2011) — The director of the City of Boston’s $3 billion retirement fund has said it was overcharged by State Street.

The assertions by the scheme followed a review of foreign-currency trading services, the Boston Globe reported. The Boston Retirement Board, which is working with the state attorney general’s office on the matter, hired an outside company to analyze the trading costs.

The City of Boston retirement scheme failed to say how large the overcharges might be, according to the Globe.

Meanwhile, the state’s $50 billion pension fund has already alleged it was overcharged $29 million over the course of a decade by State Street’s rival, BNY Mellon. In June, State Treasurer Steven Grossman claimed the custodial bank overcharged Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management (MassPRIM) by tens of millions of dollars on foreign exchange (FX) trading since 2000.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

BNY Mellon denied the accusations. “We reject the notion that [MassPRIM] was ‘overcharged,’” the bank said in a statement. “We value our client relationships and are confident that we offer our clients and their investment managers competitive and attractive FX pricing.”

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), along with several state attorney generals and other regulators, began investigations earlier this year into both BNY Mellon and State Street, which have been accused of preying on public pension funds that lack the resources to maintain proper oversight on FX trades.

Regarding the pricing of its foreign-exchange transactions, State Street has already been sued by California and the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System for alleged fraud. Filed in early February in the US district court in Boston, the suit alleged that State Street, the custody bank for more than 40% of US public pension funds, violated state law by overcharging customers for currency trades. According to the suit, the bank generated as much as $500 million in profits annually — a rate of profit that accounts for about 50% of State Street’s foreign exchange profits over the last decade. In response, State Street said the Boston-based company is “firmly committed to providing its clients with quality service and transparency in meeting their FX needs. We will vigorously defend the allegations made in the complaint and we stand by our business practices.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

As UBS's Largest Shareholder, Singapore's GIC Voices Disapproval With Rogue Trading Loss

In a rare show of expression for the usually intensely private sovereign wealth fund, Singapore's Government Investment Corporation has voiced concern with UBS's trading loss.

(September 21, 2011) — Singapore’s Government Investment Corporation (GIC) has expressed disappointment with Swiss bank UBS’s trading errors, which caused $2.3 billion in losses.

In response to media queries on a meeting between GIC’s senior management and UBS’s CEO Oswald Gruebel at the sovereign wealth fund’s headquarters in Singapore, GIC issued the following:

“GIC and UBS management discussed the alleged fraudulent trading that led to the large financial loss for UBS. GIC expressed disappointment and concern at the lapses and urged UBS to take firm action to restore confidence in the bank. GIC sought details of how UBS is tightening the control environment and looks forward to the conclusions of on-going investigations.”

Despite the fund’s disappointment, it added: “GIC’s view of UBS’s fundamental strength as a well-capitalized bank with a strong private-wealth management franchise remains unchanged.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The Singapore state investment fund is the largest UBS shareholder, owning about 6.6% of the bank. The meeting between GIC and UBS’s Gruebel stemmed from unauthorized trades by Kweku Adoboli, who has been arrested following suspicion of fraud and abuse of his position. Currently, GIC is sitting on a loss of about $8.5 billion, excluding dividends, on the UBS stake it purchased in December 2007 for $11 billion.

The controversy over the London-based trader has added to already difficult times for the Swiss bank, as Europe’s sovereign debt crisis continues to pummel financial institutions across the continent. Meanwhile, as a result of the unauthorized trading loss, ratings agency Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s (S&P), and Fitch Ratings have placed UBS on review for downgrade.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«