Bill Gross Lawsuit Contains ‘Sufficient Facts’, Judge Rules

Bill Gross’ $200 million suit against PIMCO can now head to court.

billgrosspimcoBill GrossA California state judge has issued a tentative ruling approving Bill Gross’ lawsuit against PIMCO for a court judgment.

Without ruling on the merits of the case, Judge Martha Gooding said the PIMCO co-founder’s complaint against his former employer contained enough facts to plead a case.

According to the ruling, “Plaintiff Gross alleges sufficient facts based on allegations concerning his status as the founder, a 40-year history, an alleged track record of bringing success and/or fame to the enterprise, as well as a series of alleged oral promises/assurances of continued employment.”

The ruling is in response to a legal filing by PIMCO requesting the lawsuit’s dismissal, in which the bond giant described the complaint as “a legally groundless and sad postscript” to Gross’ tenure.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“The complaint suffers from two fatal flaws,” the filing said. “First, the allegations are untrue. Second, even if every well-pled fact were assumed to be true, the complaint fails to state any viable legal claim.”

Gross sued PIMCO and its parent company Allianz in October for at least $200 million, claiming he was wrongfully pushed out of the firm and denied “hundreds of millions of dollars” in earned compensation.

Related: Bill Gross Sues PIMCO for $200M; Inside Bill Gross’ Lawsuit; PIMCO Hits Back at Gross Lawsuit

Debunking 130-30 Performance

“There is no panacea in the search for alpha,” an Aon Hewitt researcher warns.

Extended equity strategies might be delivering favorable returns now—but manager selection remains imperative to finding alpha, according to Aon Hewitt.

Despite recent positive performance by 130-30 strategies—allocations that are 130% long and 30% short—the vast majority will experience cyclical returns, Associate Partner Adrian Kurniadjaja argued in a blog post.

“Manager selection is key,” Kurniadjaja wrote. “Choosing the best strategies available may increase the likelihood of outperformance versus an approximate benchmark net of fees on an ongoing basis.”

According to Aon Hewitt, global equity 130-30 strategies have experienced a 45% increase in assets under management over the last three years, as the strategy has beat both benchmarks and long-only managers.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

However, Kurniadjaja argued that continued outperformance by extended equity strategies will rely on three factors: the ability to increase the number of forecasts to include negative forecasts; the efficacy of forecasts for both longs and shorts; and the ability to construct portfolios that adjust for the complexities of shorting.

While the first factor should be achievable by any quantitative manager, consultant warned the difficulty of the latter two “should not be underestimated.”

“The additional skills required to manage a 130-30 strategy… remain a barrier to better returns,” Kurniadjaja wrote.

Once 130-30 returns were adjusted for the additional exposure and carry, Kurniadjaja found “very little alpha.” The results were similar for diverse, less efficient asset classes such as global equity—but top performing managers were “much stronger.”

“This is a reminder that there is no panacea in the search for alpha and that one is required to identify truly skilled managers in less efficient asset classes,” he concluded.

130 30Source: Aon Hewitt’s “130/30 Renaissance”  

Related: Testing the Limits of Manager Selection & Are You Lucky or Skilled?

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.