Beware the End of the Glide Path

Rising rates would hit the end people nearest retirement disproportionally hard, according to a Casey Quirk paper, as glide paths derisk approaching their target date.

(June 3, 2013) - It may be now or never for defined contribution (DC) plans to shift out long-duration fixed income, consultancy Casey Quirk warned in its latest whitepaper.

The Connecticut-based firm projected a $1 trillion shift out of treasury bills and other traditional bonds, based on growing unease over interest rates. Defined contribution retirement accounts hold roughly a quarter of their total assets ($1.2 trillion) in fixed income. If rates rise to half of their historical average, or 4.1% for 10-year treasury bonds, the paper's author Yariv Itah estimated DC plan losses to top $180 billion.

In the event of a rate hike, target-date fund strategies would exacerbate losses for DC plan members nearest retirement. Glide paths derisk over time, largely by swapping equities for "safe haven" long bonds, despite the historically low rates of the past five years.

Short duration credit and high yield were the real safe havens in Itah's model, showing the most moderate value swings from changing interest rates. 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, a portfolio of long duration, high-grade fixed income would gain 24% with a zero rate environment, according to the analysis. But, the paper pointed out, with rate volatility, downside potential far outweighs upside. That same portfolio would lose 40% of its value if interest rates climbed to 4.1%.

Traditional fixed income managers have grown complacent (and often rich) over three decades of fairly steady and downward-trending rates, he argued, leaving the market unprepared to manage rate instability. 

Utility Rejects Second OMERS, USS, KIO Advance

Infrastructure is appealing, but investors have to be prepared to pay.

(June 3, 2013) — A UK utility company has rejected a revised proposal from a consortium of large global investors, saying it undervalued its worth.

Severn Trent, which is listed on the London Stock Exchange, this morning announced to the market that it had rejected the advances of Borealis Infrastructure Management, which is backed by the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, the Kuwait Investment Office, and the UK’s Universities Superannuation Scheme.

The firm said the consortium’s proposal, which represented a 16% premium to its share price on the day before it originally bid for the company, “fails to reflect the significant long term value of Severn Trent or to recognise its future potential”.

The consortium, operating under the name LongRiver Partners, had originally bid for the water and waste water company on May 14.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Infrastructure investing has become an investment of choice for large institutional investors. Buying companies with long-term, inflation-linked return potential seems an attractive option to many. In the UK, just three of the 10 water and waste water companies are publically listed with the others having been taken into private hands.

Related content: Why Infrastructure is Back on the Menu for Insurers

«