Asia-Pacific Investors Dump Hedge Funds in Favour of Conservative Strategies

Research from BNP Paribas Securities Services found Australian, Japanese, and Hong Kong investors favour risk budgeting when modifying their investment strategy.

(October 31, 2013) – The financial crisis has forced Asia-Pacific institutional investors to become more conservative in their investment choices, driven by a greater focus on risk management.

BNP Paribas Securities Services’ research into the market found that 63% of the 27 pension funds, insurers, sovereign wealth funds, and other asset owners quizzed agreed the financial crisis has changed their investment approach, with 44% of investors adding their asset allocation had become more conservative.

Fixed income—or assets with fixed income-like qualities—was reported to be an area for increased investment as the region’s asset owners are attracted to the more stable cash flows and less volatile returns.

There was bad news for hedge fund managers too: it emerged that hedge funds were consistently avoided by respondents, following what they perceived to be “weak performance” and issues around fees and credibility in the region.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

Incoming reforms are clearly being prepared for: 60% of the asset owners indicated that regulatory need for risk reporting had “some” or “significant” impact on their organisation, and three-quarters of them are planning on increasing their spending in this area in the next few years.

Risk budgeting—when the investor targets a total level of risk by splitting risk across the portfolio—is now more important for investors in Australia, Japan, and Hong Kong. These investors are seeking increased diversification and looking to introduce more environmental, social and governance factors into their investment strategies, the report said.

Madhu Gayer, head of investment reporting and performance for Asia-Pacific at BNP Paribas Security Services, said that while the Asian economies proved more resilient than most during the financial crisis, it was clear that 2008 was a watershed for asset owners in the area, prompting profound changes in their attitudes towards risk.

“They face a number of major challenges to integrating risk culture into their organisations,” he added.

“Data management, regulatory compliance, reporting, and talent management are all factors contributing to the overwhelming expectation from institutional investors in the region that spending on risk and performance measurement will rise in the next three to five years.”

(October 30, 2013) – The global level of investors’ confidence dived into a feeling of pessimism in October, driven by US investors’ disappointment with their country’s government shutdown.

State Street’s monthly analysis of investor sentiment showed investors in North America recording a substantial drop in confidence from 104.3—a positive rating—to 86.5.

The decline was so steep that it dragged the worldwide investor confidence levels into negative territory for the first time since May, down from 101.3 in September to 95.7 in October.

By contrast, confidence improved substantially among European institutional investors, reflected in a 10.2 point increase in the European confidence levels to 111.9—its highest recording since July 2007.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

Asian investors stayed their course, resulting in the Asian index recording a modest change, rising 0.9 points to finish at 96.2—still in negative territory.

“The fiscal showdown in the US clearly took the wind from the sails of institutional investors,” said Paul O’Connell, co-author of the report and vice president and senior researcher of State Street Global Markets.

“Notwithstanding the 11th hour resolution of the immediate crisis, investors are aware that the long-term fiscal policy of the US remains to be negotiated, and that the impact of such negotiations on growth and confidence is yet to be seen.”

His colleague Michael Metcalfe, head of cross strategy research at State Street Global Markets, said that by contrast, the rise in investor confidence in Europe showed that they hoped the worst of the Eurozone crisis was now behind them.

“The US crisis of confidence, in contrast, may just be the beginning, unless policy uncertainty is reduced,” he added.

Russell Investments is also concerned about the impact of US politics on investors’ confidence levels. In its fourth quarter “Strategists’ outlook and barometer”, the authors found a US political tug-of-war remains a great threat to economic recovery.

“The eleventh-hour deal we have just witnessed is just another round of Congressional ‘kick the can,’” said Mike Dueker, chief economist at Russell.

According to the report, policy mistakes could cause anxiety in the bond markets as well as a decline in confidence in the US economy. But the biggest problem of all was a possible halt in the “momentum” of the economy.

If politicians could reach a reasonable fiscal deal, Russell said the US could expect to see almost 3% growth and an average of 200,000 more jobs per month next year. It also predicted 10-year US treasury yields would reach 2.8% in the first quarter of 2014 and 3.2% by the end of the year.

UBS is more positive—in its recent Global Economics Perspectives note, its economists predicted that the government shutdown would not produce any “lasting damage” to the economy.

State Street’s index measures investor confidence or risk appetite quantitatively by analyzing the actual buying and selling patterns of institutional investors.

The greater the percentage allocation to equities, the higher risk appetite or confidence. A reading of 100 is neutral, where investors are neither increasing nor decreasing their long-term allocations to risky assets.