Aon Hewitt Urges Legal Simplification on EU Pension Legislation

Consulting firm Aon Hewitt claims that EU rules on the establishment of cross border pensions must be simplified.

(August 28, 2011) — Simplification is needed on cross-border pensions, Aon Hewitt believes, noting that the European Commission (EC) should consider a pan-European pensions regime instead of individual national guidelines.

In its response to a consultation by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority on the review of the EU Directive on the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (IORPs), Leonardo Sforza, head of Research and EU Affairs at Aon Hewitt, said in a statement: “It is only through the deployment of a more business-friendly regulatory environment for occupational pensions, that employers, employees, IORPs and financial service providers will reap the full benefit of the EU Single Market. The affordability of current and future pension arrangements for employers is a crucial issue to be considered by policy makers and supervisory authorities at both the national and European levels.”

He continued: “Any new measure should not undermine the cost-effectiveness of occupational retirement provision in the European Economic Area. In this context, the EU intervention on the IORP directive needs to be more like physiotherapy – an enabler of activity – rather than like a surgical intervention which becomes invasive and, even with good intentions, runs the risk of compromising the vital organs of the many different ‘pension’ bodies.”

The European Federation for Retirement Provision had additionally argued against the use of Solvency II as a basis for the new IORP directive.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Concern over EU pension legislation is nothing new. Last year, the UK’s National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) cautioned that new EU rules on pension funding could increase the rate at which companies are closing their definite benefit schemes.

The NAPF, which has shared its concerns with the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), Trades Union Congress (TUC), Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW), and Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), noted that it’s essential that the EU acknowledge the rich diversity of pension provision across member states when thinking about how to meet its core objectives of member states providing a strong, adequate and sustainable pension system.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

BofA Profits From Buffett's Capital Injection

Berkshire Hathaway's Warren Buffett has made a major investment in the largest US bank.

(August 26, 2011) — Berkshire Hathaway Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffett’s investment vehicle has injected $5 billion into Bank of America, driving up its previously lagging shares.

“We are building the best franchise in financial services and we have laid out a clear plan to deliver long-term shareholder value,” said Bank of America Chief Executive Officer Brian Moynihan in a statement. “I remain confident that we have the capital and liquidity we need to run our business. At the same time, I also recognize that a large investment by Warren Buffett is a strong endorsement in our vision and our strategy.”

Buffett added: “Bank of America is a strong, well-led company, and I called Brian to tell him I wanted to invest in it. I am impressed with the profit-generating abilities of this franchise, and that they are acting aggressively to put their challenges behind them. Bank of America is focused on their customers and on serving them well. That’s what customers want, and that’s the company’s strategy.”

Earlier this month, Moynihan asserted that Bank of America has no need for additional capital and that “we simply could not continue on a course of diluting our shareholders to raise capital”.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Buffett’s move follows a similar deal struck with Goldman Sachs along with GE during the 2008 financial crisis. However, Buffett famously refused to loan money to Lehman Brothers. He was correct in his predictions — Buffett’s Goldman Sachs investment reportedly generated a $3.7 billion profit for Berkshire Hathaway while Lehman folded.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«