Analysts: Earnings Will Improve in 2020

Forecast seems to hinge on progress in resolving the trade dispute. Hmmmm.

Amid all the caterwauling about stinky corporate earnings in our future, analysts are feeling a little better about 2020.

By their estimates, earnings for the S&P 500 look nice next year. After an expected negative 4.6% reading for this year’s third quarter (companies are starting their reporting) and a minuscule positive 2.3% increase in the fourth, the projected performance for all of 2019 is up a mere 1.1%). Ah, never fear:  the profits picture improves in the upcoming year, according to the FactSet Research analysts’ consensus.

Next year’s first quarter will climb by 7.3% in the first period and 8.6% in the second, they say. For 2020’s final two quarters, profits for the broad market index will be slightly over 10%. Calendar year 2020 overall would tally a 10.6% increase. That’s not very impressive when compared to the showing for 2018, when earnings nudged 20%. But this would be a lot better than 2019’s pathetic score.

Wait a minute. With growth slowing worldwide and dour signals in the US, such as a falloff in manufacturing, how can anyone possibly be optimistic about 2020?

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

An upbeat expectation on the US-China trade war, that’s how. As John Lynch, chief investment strategist at LPL Financial, explained it, some rapprochement in the conflict will come to pass. In a note to clients, he wrote that “we think better days lie ahead.” Although he doubted that a grand, all-encompassing deal will be struck, he predicted “progress on trade to keep U.S. economic growth at or above the trend” will be enough to keep the economic expansion going.

Beijing and Washington are supposedly hammering out the details of an initial agreement affecting intellectual property protection for the US and agricultural sales to China, along with a delay on new US tariffs on the Chinese.

But we’ve seen these talks founder before. We’ve also seen analysts getting too positive about the future. In its report from last February, FactSet had earnings accelerating through the year to finish out with a 9.9% showing in the final quarter of 2019, and 6.6% for the entire year. That was wide of the mark, to say the least.

Related Stories:

The S&P 500 Keeps Singing the Sour Earnings Song

Yikes, Lofty Corporate Debt Will Hurt Us When Earnings Slip, Moody’s Warns

Earnings Recession Is a Non-Event: 1Q Results Are Flat

Tags: , , ,

Revoking Brexit Provides ‘Best Economic Outcome’ for UK

IFS says no-deal Brexit would be worst possible scenario for British economy.

When it comes to the possible Brexit scenarios, the options the UK faces are the good, the bad, and the ugly, according to an analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).

A no-deal Brexit would “provide the worst economic scenario” for the UK economy, said the IFS, and neither extending the Brexit deadline, nor leaving the EU with an agreement would be ideal, although the latter would be the lesser of two evils. But the best economic outcome for the UK, according to the IFS, would be for the country to revoke Brexit altogether and remain in the union.

That’s not something UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson wants to hear, considering that he famously said he’d “rather be dead in a ditch” than so much as ask the EU for a Brexit extension.

But like it or not, the continuing process of leaving the European Union will be “arguably the most important determinant of the UK’s economic trajectory,” said the IFS.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The IFS released forecasts for the UK economy under four Brexit scenarios:

  1. An extension of the Brexit deadline, and continued uncertainty.
  2. A no-deal scenario accompanied by significant fiscal loosening.
  3. A negotiated Brexit deal passed through the current parliament.
  4. A second referendum resulting in a vote to remain in the EU.

“In each case, the impacts on the economy will depend not just on relationships with Brussels,” said the IFS, “but also on policy decisions made in Westminster.”

With two weeks left until the Brexit deadline, the UK and EU still have yet to come to an amicable divorce agreement which has left the British economy in a state of uncertainty.  If the UK continues to delay Brexit by seeking an extension to the Oct. 31 deadline, the IFS assumes a further fiscal loosening of between 1 and 2% of GDP.t said there would be a chance, albeit small, that interest rates would be cut. Growth would remain below 1% in 2020 and, then pick up slightly though remain “very poor,” at below 1.5% in 2021 and 2022.

While continued uncertainty provides a gloomy economic forecast, leaving the EU without a deal would be “considerably worse, even under a relatively benign scenario,” said the IFS.

In this scenario, the IFS said it expects the UK government would implement further fiscal loosening totaling 2% of GDP. The Bank of England would cut interest rates to zero, and implement £50 billion ($63.2 billion) of quantitative easing. Additionally, private consumption and investment growth would fall, while net trade would also create a drag on growth. Overall, the IFS said the UK economy would be stagnant over the next two years and grow by just 1.1% in 2022, leaving it 2.5% smaller in that year than it would have been if Brexit were merely delayed.

“We find that a ‘no-deal’ Brexit makes for the hardest hit to the economy under these scenarios,” said the IFS.

Securing a Brexit deal would be better for the economy over the next two to three years than another delay, according to the IFS’ analysis. Assuming a delay would lead to tax cuts and further spending increases growth would pick up to “a still poor” 1.5% a year in the short term.

“Some pent-up investment should occur, and consumer confidence would improve, as the risk of a no-deal Brexit recedes,” said the IFS,

But “the most optimistic outlook for growth,” according to the IFS, would come from a scenario in which the 2016 referendum is overturned, Brexit is revoked, and the UK remains in the EU. If this were to happen, the IFS said it assumes the government would implement significant tax and spending increases, with a tightening of labor market regulation, and a rise in interest rates. In this case, the IFS forecast there would be GDP growth of 2% a year.

Related Stories:

A Scorecard of Suffering for a No-Deal Brexit

Hard Brexit Could Raise UK Pension Deficit by £219 Billion

FCA Issues No-Deal Brexit Tips for Firms

 

Tags: , , ,

«