AMP Capital’s IDF III Scores Record $4.1 Billion Commitments

Sees strongest support from Japan, Korea, Canada, and Germany-based institutional investors.

AMP Capital is celebrating a record $4.1 billion in commitments upon the final close on its infrastructure debt strategy, AMP Capital Infrastructure Debt Fund III (IDF III)—more than doubling its $2 billion target.

The Australia-based special investment manager—which features more than A$165 billion in funds under management—raised $2.5 billion for the mezzanine debt strategy, another $800 million in co-investment rights, and an additional $800 million from investors seeking access to its deal capabilities.

Believed to be one of the largest infrastructure debt strategy fundraises in the world, IDF III contains more than 125 investors from 12 countries—the strongest coming from Japan, Korea, Canada, and Germany-based institutional investors. It’s also AMP Capital’s third infrastructure debt fund in six years.

After it raised $500 million globally, AMP’s first infrastructure debt fund was closed in 2012. Its successor, IDF II, raised $1.1 billion—with $250 million in additional co-investment pledges.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“We had success in new markets such as Korea, where we raised more than $300 million, and Canada, where some of the country’s large pension plans invested in our strategy for the first time. Japanese investors, early adopters of infrastructure debt as an investment strategy, were also strong supporters of the fund,” said AMP Capital Global Head of Infrastructure Debt Andrew Jones in a statement. “Our focus is now on finding great assets on behalf of our IDF III investors. We have already secured four high-quality assets for the fund and are seeing further opportunities across a range of sectors, including renewables, telecommunications, and energy distribution in OECD countries. Infrastructure companies increasingly view private mezzanine debt as an ideal source of funding for a range of their specialised financing needs.”

IDF III has a four-year investment period.

Tags: , , ,

Connecticut Liabilities Outpace Asset Growth

Liabilities more than double in 10 years, while assets gain 28%.

Connecticut’s total and unfunded liabilities have significantly outpaced their asset growth over the last six years, according to the state’s Office of Fiscal Analysis.

Between the end of June 2010 and the end of June 2016, the state’s total liabilities surged 53% to $32.3 billion, from $21.1 billion, while its unfunded liabilities grew at an even faster pace, rising 73% to $20.4 billion from $11.8 billion. And during those six years, the funded ratio dropped to 37% from 44%. Meanwhile, the state’s assets increased only 28% to $11.9 billion in 2016 from $9.3 billion in 2010.

But as bad as those numbers seem to be, the reality may be worse, according to a report released in May by the Hoover Institution. According to “Hidden Debt, Hidden Deficits: 2017 Edition,” state treasuries are underestimating the true cost of their pension debt by billions of dollars.

By the calculations of report’s author, Joshua Rauh, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, and professor of finance at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, Connecticut’s unfunded liability in 2015 was more than twice what the state had reported: $68.4 billion, instead of $30 billion.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Governmental accounting standards for pensions were changed in 2014 and 2015 with the implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) statements 67 and 68. Statements 67 and 68 require state and local governments to report on the assets and liabilities of their systems with a greater degree of harmonization.

“However, these standards still preserved the basic flaw in governmental pension accounting: the fallacy that liabilities can be measured by choosing an expected return on plan assets,” said the report. “This procedure uses as inputs the forecasts of investment returns on fundamentally risky assets and ignores the risk necessary to target hoped-for returns.”

For example, the report said that a liability-weighted expected return of 7.6%, which was the average expected return in 2015, implies that state and city governments are expecting the money they invest today to double approximately every 9.5 years.

“That means that a typical government would view a promise to make a worker a $100,000 payment in 2026 as ‘fully funded’ even if it had set aside less than $50,000 in assets in 2016,” said the report. A similar payment in 2036 would be viewed as “fully funded” with less than $25,000 in assets in 2016, it said.

“This practice obscures the true extent of public sector liabilities,” said the report. “In order to target high returns, systems have taken increased investment positions in the stock market and other risky asset classes such as private equity, hedge funds, and real estate.

“The targeted returns may or may not be achieved, but public-sector accounting and budgeting proceed under the assumption that they will be achieved with certainty,” added the report. “Furthermore, while systems face somewhat stricter disclosure requirements under the new GASB standards, these standards will not directly affect funding decisions.”

Tags: , , ,

«