Alaska Pension Withdraws Benefits Suspension Application

The Alaska Ironworkers Pension Plan says it will reapply before the end of the year.

The Alaska Ironworkers Pension Plan has withdrawn its application seeking a suspension of benefits with the Treasury Department, but says it intends to submit a new application on or before Dec. 29. 

In its original application, which was submitted March 30, the plan’s benefit suspension proposal called for the reduction of all benefits earned through June 30, 2016, by 34.5% across the board for all participants and beneficiaries.

The amount of the benefit due to each individual would have been multiplied by 0.655 to calculate the new amount. It also would not have reduced any benefit below 110% of the level guaranteed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation PBGC.

The Alaska Ironworkers Pension Plan was determined to be in critical and declining status for the fiscal year starting July 1, 2016, by its actuary, which said the plan would become insolvent by July 2030.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“The trustees have determined that a level percentage suspension to all benefits is the fairest option available, as well as being the easiest option to understand, and will have the greatest likelihood of success in this attempt to rescue the plan,” said the plan in its now-withdrawn application. 

“In particular, the union representatives on the board have determined that any suspension that provides for different treatment for different groups of participants or beneficiaries would generate controversy and hard feelings within the group, and would not be fairer than a flat-percentage reduction.”

It’s unclear which, if any, of the changes suggested in the original application the plan will keep when it reapplies for a suspension of pension benefits. Charles Dunnagan, attorney for the Alaska Ironworkers Pension Plan, was unable to respond to questions in time for publication.

Tags: , , ,

TCRS Sees 11.4% Returns in Fiscal 2017

Pensions, state budgets “are as vulnerable as they have ever been,” PEW Retirement Officer says.

Driven by a strong stock market performance thanks to its large equities stake, the $47 billion Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) realized 11.4% returns in fiscal year 2017, well above the 7.5% benchmark.

“The central banks of the world have continued to intervene in both the stock and the bond markets, creating demand,” said Stephen Frohsin, a principal at Woodmont Investment Counsel in Nashville in an interview with the Tennessean. “When you have earnings growth and you have, in some cases, robust economic activity, then that naturally leads to higher stock prices.”

This brings the five and 10-year returns to 8.7% and 5.9%, respectively.

The TCRS, which pays 137,000 higher education, K-12 public schools, and at 500 local government retirees, has not seen double digit returns since 2014’s 17%. In fiscal years 2016 and 2015, the largest fund managed by Treasury saw slim returns at 2.8% and 3.3%.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Despite small returns in recent years, Tennessee is one of the top performing states in the country. According to a July report from PEW Charitable Trusts, only eight states were more than 90% funded in 2015, including Tennessee. In an April PEW report, only three states had better funding ratios than “The Volunteer State” in the same year.

While most indicators show pensions have stabilized, Aleena Oberthur, PEW’s Officer of the States’ Public Sector Retirement Systems told the Tennessean that they are still not out of the woods when it comes to a full recovery from 2008 and 2009 losses, which Tennessee experienced -1.2% and -15.3% returns.

“Pension funds and state budgets are as vulnerable as they have ever been to the next economic downturn,” Oberthur said, also adding that the state’s hybrid plan, a 401(K)-style plan which raised the full benefit retirement age from 60 to 60 implemented in 2014 to be a benefit for both employees and taxpayers. “There are exceptions, of course, and Tennessee is one of them.”

Tags: , , , ,

«