Alaska Governor Reveals Pension Deficit Plan

Sarah Palin’s successor wants to solve Alaska’s public pension problem.

(December 6, 2013) — The Governor of Alaska has urged the state to transfer $3 billion from a savings account to help remedy the shortfall in some of its public pension funds.

Sean Parnell announced a plan yesterday that would effectively remove the funds’ deficit and lower the costs paid annually from state coffers.

“State pension contributions represent the single largest cost driver in the state’s operating budget,” Governor Parnell said. “This year’s budget contains an unfunded pension liability contribution of more than $600 million, and the payment plan requires an increase to more than $700 million next year. Soon, the operating budget would be required to contribute more than $1 billion annually to this one line-item.”

The Governor said current projections put Alaska’s Public Employees’ Retirement System and Teachers’ Retirement System with a combined unfunded liability of $11.9 billion.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“If left unaddressed, the annual state pension contribution will increasingly burden the state and hamper our ability to meet the people’s constitutional priorities,” said Parnell. “Paying down the debt now is this generation’s responsibility that we will not leave to the children of Alaska to deal with in the future.”

The governor will seek legislative approval for a one-time $3 billion appropriation from the Constitutional Budget Reserve into the retirement trust funds. A savings infusion in the fiscal year 2015 budget would enable the annual state pension contribution to drop to $500 million a year, Parnell said, and would increase the funded status of each retirement system by 10% almost immediately.

Elsewhere in the US, last week a group of lawmakers in Illinois’ state legislature called for increased state contributions as part of a proposed pension reform plan. Its five public pension plans are currently underfunded by over $100 billion.

Related content: Red State? Blue State? Underfunded State. & The Politics of Pensions

Tussle at the Top for Japan’s Giant Pension Fund

Two senior players involved in Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund are at loggerheads over whether to sell domestic bonds or not.

(December 6, 2013) — A rift has developed between two of Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund’s (GPIF’s) top chiefs over the giant fund’s domestic debt holdings.

Takatoshi Ito, chairman of the advisory panel serving the pension fund and a renowned economist, called for the GPIF to reduce its holdings of Japanese debt from its current 58% of the overall portfolio to 52%.

Speaking in Japan yesterday, Ito said now was the right time for the ¥124 trillion ($1.22 trillion) fund to sell up as the Bank of Japan is buying domestic debt, Bloomberg has reported.

A report recently published by the advisory panel called for greater investments in overseas assets, private equity, commodities, infrastructure, and real-estate investment trusts.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

But the suggestion has been publicly rebuffed by the pension fund’s president and aiCIO Power 100 member Takahiro Mitani.

The central bank, which is buying more than ¥7 trillion of bonds a month, will fail in its goal of spurring 2% inflation and the risk of owning so much domestic debt was overstated by Ito’s panel, Mitani said this week. 

Ito’s speech appears to have had an impact on bond yields in Japan: the nation’s 10-year sovereign bonds touched 0.68% after Ito’s remarks, the highest since October 1.

The GPIF would have to sell about ¥7.5 trillion of local bonds to pare its holdings to 52% of its assets, according to calculations by Bloomberg based on the fund’s assets as of September 30.

Ito argued that if the GPIF did not reduce its holdings, it would send out the message to overseas investors that the largest institution doesn’t believe in Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s economic stimulus plan to push inflation to 2%.

“Foreign investors are getting confused,” he said. “They think ‘isn’t this weird? Isn’t it a government organization?’ One of them must be wrong — either Abenomics is a mistake, or GPIF is going to see losses.”

Outside of Japan, opinion is divided on how the pension fund should progress. “GPIF is being bullied into reducing their bond holdings while all other private funds including insurance firms have been raising their bond portion and lowering stocks,” Amir Anvarzadeh, a manager of Japanese equity sales at BGC Partners, told Bloomberg.

“Japan Government Bonds holdings are one area they can have a very large impact, and yields are shooting up right now.”

Related Content: Japan Pension Ponders Nikkei-Boosting Game-Changer and Japan’s Pension Giant to Review Asset Allocation

«