It’s the 5th Trade Deal Announcement: What if This One Falls Apart, Too?

The latest breakthrough is laden with ‘ambiguity’ and ‘fragile,’ says the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ China expert.

When news broke late last week that Washington and Beijing had forged a “phase one” deal to defuse the trade war, Wall Street’s response was underwhelming: The S&P 500 rose 0.23%. OK, you can argue that maybe the joyful tidings already were priced in.

But this is the fifth time that “a deal has been prematurely declared” and the “ambiguity” around this one makes it “fragile,” declared the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ top analyst for Chinese business and economics.

“It is not hard at all to see how it could collapse as a result of untoward actions by either side,” wrote Scott Kennedy, in a CSIS commentary. Should that happen, the stock market, as it has shown in the past, likely would swoon. US corporate capital spending, held down amid the uncertainty about international trade, is bound to stay low. And even bigger tariffs could come into effect.

With many specifics yet to be clarified, Kennedy stated, “it is unclear if the struggles of the past two and a half years have been worth it. The costs have been substantial and far reaching, the benefits narrow and ephemeral.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Kennedy ticked off the previous four seeming breakthroughs that broke down:

July 2017: Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said he had a promise from Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang that China would lower overcapacity in its steel industry. President Donald Trump canceled the deal.

May 2018: Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin reached a “framework agreement” with Vice Premier Liu He. Trump scrapped the arrangement a few days later.

April 2019: With market surging on word that a major US-China pact was imminent, China suddenly scrubbed much of their offer.  That resulted in Trump’s boosting tariffs and imposing sanctions on Chinese telecom company Huawei.

Early October 2019: Trump announced a phase one deal, although what he really meant was that the negotiations were only just getting under way.

This time, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative released a statement touting, in general terms, a Chinese commitment to ease up on intellectual property theft, forcing American business partners with Chinese firms to divulge trade secrets, and boosting purchases of US goods and services. In return, new US tariffs slated for Sunday wouldn’t happen and some previous levies would be scaled back. The Chinese regime confirmed a deal existed but added scant detail.

As the think tank’s Kennedy noted, “aside from a cessation of continued escalation, there is not much worth cheering.”

In the days and weeks ahead, we’ll see how this plays out. The agreement, if it actually goes through, is merely the start to a long process involving the Chinese government’s subsidizing its industry and other hot topics. Not to mention whether it really will comply with the dictates of phase one.

Related stories:

Is China Unstoppable?

OK, the China Trade Talks Are Tough, But What Would a Pact Look Like?

Senators Rebuke Federal Pension’s Criticisms of China Investment Ban

Tags: , , , ,

South Africa Government Pension Returns 2.6% in Fiscal 2019

Robust returns from commodities help $122.9 billion fund beat benchmark.

South Africa’s Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) returned 2.6% during the fiscal year ended March 31, down from 8.5% in 2018, but beating its benchmark of 2.3%. That brought its asset value to R1.82 trillion ($122.9 billion), an increase of R17 billion compared to the previous year.  

The fund attributed the outperformance of its benchmark to improved resource commodity prices, which it said favored the fund’s tactical overweight position in resources relative to the benchmark. The basic materials sector of the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE) returned a robust 41% over the 12 months to March 31.

The GEPF said its portfolio has generated “healthy long-term returns” that are in line with its investment strategy and reported five- and 10-year annualized returns of 7.0% and 11.6% respectively as of the end of March. It said the returns were mainly driven by local equity and bond market returns.

The asset allocation of the fund is 50% in domestic equity, 33% in domestic bonds 5% in foreign equity, 5% in domestic property, 4% in cash and money markets, 2% in “Africa,” and 1% in foreign bonds.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Domestic cash was the fund’s top performing asset class returning 7.26% for the year ended March. 31, compared with 7.41% at the same time last year.  Domestic bonds, which returned 3.45%, was next, compared with 16.18% last year. Domestic equities gained a meager 0.43%, compared with a 9.41% return in 2018, while domestic listed property lost 5.68%, after losing 7.09% last year.

“The performance of domestic equities and bonds, which constitute 80% of the fund’s assets, remained sluggish,” said the GEPF in its annual report. “Major domestic asset classes remained under pressure, reflecting lower business confidence in the local market, in line with the weaker domestic economy.”

The local equity benchmark declined to 0.4% as of the end of March from an annual return of 9.4% in 2018, while the local All Bond Index annual return fell to 3.5% from 16.1% in fiscal 2018.

“The financial results once again highlight that the performance of the fund is not isolated from the country’s economic and development constraints,” said the GEPF in a release. “If the GEPF is to address this dependence, it has to consider further diversification including increasing its off-shore investments.”

Related Stories:

Africa’s Biggest Fund Suspends Acting CEO

Danish Pension Firms Launch Africa Fund

Africa’s Largest Pension Fund Returns 8.6%

 

 

 

Tags: , , ,

«