MSCI Questions Efficiency of Risk-Based Diversification

The application of risk-based strategies for capturing lower volatility may be viewed as more appropriate for a long-term investment strategy than for short-term risk reduction, according to a MSCI whitepaper.

(March 7, 2012) — There has been increasing interest among institutional investors in the application of risk-based investment strategies in their equity allocation since the last financial crisis, according to a recent whitepaper by MSCI. 

The paper concludes: “While the key motivation is often the need to cushion and diversify extreme risk, the possibility of capturing the ‘low volatility effect’ provides an additional incentive for the adoption of risk-based investment strategies. In this note, we examine the historical behavior of two risk-based investment strategies and investigate their potential application in an institutional equity portfolio.”

The paper — written by Chin Ping Chia, Dimitris Melas and Tom Zhou — asserts that while risk-based strategies tend to outperform when equity markets are declining, it is important to point out that they tend to lag behind when the markets experience upticks. Furthermore, the paper notes that risk-based strategies aim to provide alternative beta exposure for institutional investors through an objective and transparent index construction process.

MSCI concludes that despite risk-based strategies underperforming during periods of market upticks, lower volatility combined with comparable average monthly performance has in many instances led to higher long-term compounded returns, measured against a more volatile return series. “Therefore the application of risk-based strategies for capturing the low volatility effect may be viewed as more appropriate for a long-term investment strategy than for short-term risk reduction,” according to the firm.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Risk-based approaches to portfolio construction have gained traction among investors eager for more stability in a volatile environment. This was exemplified in November 2010 by a decision by the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), one of the largest US public pensions, to explore a risk-based allocation approach that would divide assets into risk buckets, instead of traditional asset classes.

“The purpose of this Investment Committee project is to look at the portfolio through a different lens, to help quantify and manage risk in a different way,” said a memo to the board written by CalSTRS chief investment officer Chris Ailman. “While this may seem like a simple exercise, it turns the foundation structure of the investment portfolio on its head. We define our world by asset classes; this structure ignores the traditional definition….This new idea for asset allocation is almost radical in today’s setting.”

Northern Trust: Popularity of Passive Investing Fuels Customized Beta Strategies

Increased focus on passive investments is making customized beta strategies increasingly appealing to institutional investors.

(March 6, 2012) — The growing use of passive investing strategies among institutional investors is fueling the popularity of customized indices to meet fund objectives, according to a new survey by Northern Trust.

In the survey, 40% of institutions globally identified customized beta as being relevant to their current portfolio construction models. Meanwhile, 51% said they would be interested in exploring customized indices as a way of addressing their objectives. However, only 22% have evaluated customized beta approaches.

In terms of the popularity of passive investing, worldwide, approximately one third of all institutions surveyed by Northern Trust said passive products makes up more than 40% of their equity and fixed-income assets today. Despite this continued trend toward allocating to index strategies, 63% of all participating institutions said that known inefficiencies should be addressed and removed, with one in five saying they would be willing to pay for this service.

The global survey was conducted of 121 institutional investors, predominantly pension funds, in Europe, Asia and North America, representing more than $500 billion in assets.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The report on the study — titled “Customized Beta: Changing Perspectives on Passive Investing” — investigates the attitudes of institutional investors at a time when turbulence and uncertainty have put a spotlight on risk management. “The research highlights how the increased use of passive investing is leading to a blurring of traditionally-held views on the separation of alpha and beta, as more choices exist for investors within the spectrum of beta,” Northern Trust stated in a release. 

“Investors around the world are reframing their thinking about their funds’ objectives, with an overwhelming 84% from our survey saying that meeting their investment objective is more important than outperforming a benchmark,” said John Krieg, managing director, asset management, Europe, Middle East & Africa region, Northern Trust. 

Institutional investors surveyed by Northern Trust cited a range of benefits derived from customized beta strategies. While European respondents view such strategies as having the potential to increase transparency, and as an effective screening tool to meet socially responsible investing and environmental, social and governance investment objectives, Asian respondents see customized beta strategies as a way to eliminate methodology- and weighting-based biases from standard indices. Meanwhile, North American respondents consider customized beta strategies as a means of gaining exposure to new markets.

The heightened focus on passive investing was also revealed in a survey conducted last month by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods (KBW). According to the firm — which questioned approximately 42 decisionmakers at corporate and government pension plans, endowments, foundations, and investment managers in order to garner insight into institutional investors’ asset allocation and manager selection process — respondents generally expected to increase their allocations to passive and alternative strategies. In particular, respondents seemed interested in various hedge fund strategies and specialized strategies, such as real estate, energy, and infrastructure. 

«