Investors Eye Emerging Markets for Some Relative Quiet

Investors may find opportunities in countries unlikely to be significantly affected by geopolitical volatility.

Art by Valeria Petrone


Emerging markets investors say there are opportunities for long-term asset owners in countries such as Colombia, India and South Africa, among others, and parts of Europe for long-term asset owners.

Investors believe countries ripe for investment include those that have faced economic instability, driving down the cost of investment, but are now leading local reform efforts. This makes them less likely to be disrupted by geopolitical risks such as market shifts caused by U.S. election results and wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, sources say.

Colombia Set to Rebound

One prime example, according to Ed Al-Hussainy, a senior rates analyst and head of emerging market fixed-income research at Columbia Threadneedle Investments, is Colombia, where he foresees fixed-income opportunities.

“The story in Colombia is that it used to be an investment-grade borrower several years ago,” Al-Hussainy explains. “They fell from grace. They borrowed too much and spent it unwisely. But in the past few years, the government has been making an effort to raise the tax revenue and lower their spending. They have been successful at reducing their risk. ”  

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

He notes that the opportunity is in Colombia sovereign debt denominated in U.S. dollars (not local currency). “It’s the government in Colombia doing something—and it’s not dependent on the U.S. election,” Al-Hussainy says. “When things go from horrific to bad, we want to catch that turn.”

The investment team at Matthews Asia noted in August that Latin America offered long-term emerging markets opportunities for equities investors.

While the firm was “cautious in the short term” and expected volatility in the market leading up to the U.S. presidential election, its investment team expected “Latin America’s strength in natural resources, its structural attributes and digital innovation to be significant traits that will create investment opportunities,” according to a blog post co-authored by Matthews Asia  CIO Sean Taylor and Portfolio Manager Jeremy Sutch.

“Latin America’s markets are cheap compared with other regions and global monetary easing may provide a macro boost that feeds through to improvements in equity performance,” Taylor and Sutch wrote.

In the longer term, “a number of Latin American economies, including Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Chile and Peru, have robust domestic consumption and structural growth attributes, including proximity to the U.S., diverse global trade links and strong foreign direct investment,” the post   stated.

Kirstie Spence, a fixed-income portfolio manager at Capital Group, wrote in a recent report that many Latin American currencies are “sensitive to emerging markets risk appetite” and could therefore struggle in the short term due to tariffs levied by the administration of President-elect Donald Trump and anti-immigration measures. But these currencies “could benefit longer term if tariff policy is focused on China,” easing local trade concerns, Spence wrote.

Relative Improvement Matters

Another emerging market opportunity comes as a surprise and an exception to the rule: Al-Hussainy says asset owners should not  overlook sovereign debt investing opportunities in Ukraine, despite the country’s ongoing  war with Russia.

“They’ve gone through a bond restructuring process,” Al-Hussainy says of Ukraine. “And the debt burden on the government has declined compared to last year,” he adds, noting that distressed debt opportunities would be attractive, as there is an “opportunity for bonds to reprice higher.”

In September, Ukraine concluded the restructuring of more than $20 billion of international debt to improve its macroeconomic stability, even amid its war with Russia.

“Countries in emerging markets are typically driven by their domestic stories and are generally poorer in credit quality,” Al-Hussainy says. “More specifically, we like Colombia, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Turkey, Pakistan and Ukraine. The through line for much of these (markets) is that they are low-quality in terms of their credit rating.”

Local reform is also happening in these markets, and Columbia Threadneedle likes that these developments are “divorced from the U.S. election” and other major geopolitical factors, he explains.

“The problem we had going into the [U.S.] election was everything was quite expensive,” Al-Hussainy says. “Emerging market assets have done really well for the past year and a half, because there was a lot of cheap stuff to buy, as far as emerging markets credit. That job became somewhat harder after the election, because assets have rallied again. ”  

Targets in Wake of U.S. Election

Given the outcome of the U.S. presidential election, Vivek Tanneeru, a portfolio manager for emerging markets equities strategies at Matthews Asia, expects India will be among the markets least impacted by policy shifts from Trump’s administration , which, based on early foreign policy appointments, appear to be focused on China and trade, among other issues.

India is “ largely a domestic consumption-driven market,” Tanneeru explains, noting that Trump’s agenda for a second term is expected to include a reduced trade deficit—and the use of tariffs with foreign trade partners as leverage.

In addition to India, he is optimistic about “countries where self-help is going on in the form of structural reform.”

“South Africa is a prime example of that,” Tanneeru says. “South Africa has had really bad mismanagement problems around power outages or blackouts and in the transportation and logistics sectors. Those issues have been addressed over the last two years. In the transportation sector, they are working on addressing challenges in the rail network. Those kinds of efforts are going to pick up pace under the new coalition government.”

“Evaluations are cheap, though not as cheap as before the [late May South African] election,” Tanneeru continues. “It’s not gangbusters growth like you’ve seen with some of the emerging markets, but it’s a good change.”

He also notes that there should be foreign direct investment opportunities in South Africa for U.S. asset owners, as the country appears open to market participation through investments in its power transmission efforts, as well as railway and marine transportation.

“The idea there is to anchor this private participation so the power transmission (sector) can be built out,” Tanneeru adds.

Al-Hussainy, of Columbia Threadneedle, says that, overall, emerging markets investors should be watchful of the U.S. election’s impact on the dollar.

“In the aftermath of the election here, the dollar has strengthened quite meaningfully. It just hit a two-year high today,” Al-Hussainy said in a November 12 phone interview. “You can imagine if this persists into the middle of next year. A strong dollar is painful for emerging markets.  Are Trump-administration policies going to strengthen or weaken the dollar? Right now, a lot of the things that are being talked about will strengthen the dollar. If you’re an institutional investor, watch what happens with the U.S. dollar: If the dollar strength persists, that could cause a lot of pain for emerging markets investors next year.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Conflict Not the Biggest Factor in Oil Prices Anymore

Economic factors, especially Chinese demand destruction and the growth of renewables, are flattening demand and increasing market volatility for fossil fuels.

Art by Valeria Petrone

 


2024 has been a tough year for energy investments—especially oil. Benchmark U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil has traded in a range of $60 to $80 per barrel for most of the year, a trend likely to continue. At an industry event in November, Rick Muncrief, CEO of shale producer Devon Energy Corp., told attendees he expects oil to trade in that range for the “foreseeable future,” as demand remains flat to negative.

Other parts of the energy mix—including liquified natural gas, nuclear power and renewables—are all more or less maintaining the status quo. If this continues through the end of the year, energy investors may close out 2024 feeling like they dealt with a lot of volatility just to end up muddling through. 2025 could bring a similar story.

Energy investors may have to get used to higher volatility, as conflicts in the Middle East continue and the global economy reworks its energy needs. Historically, wars, particularly in that region, have led to sharp increases in demand due to disruptions in supply. This was notably the case during the 1973 Yom Kippur War, which resulted in a near quadrupling of oil prices, and Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, when oil prices spiked significantly due to sanctions imposed on oil producer Russia  (they have since stabilized, even though the conflict continues).

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Sources say the volatility could offer opportunities, but it will be important for investors to focus on quality and keep a close eye on risk.

Subdued Demand, Shaky Pricing

“We’re trading at pretty beaten-down levels here; pricing is at a level where it is not necessarily making money for producers, and the problem is multifold,” says Bob Yawger,   at Mizuho Americas. “The biggest problem right now is Chinese demand destruction. China has been the source of demand growth for the past 10 years, and the slowing of their economy has cut demand by as much as 3% this year. So we’re looking at zero demand growth this year.”

Alongside this drop in demand, Yawger says, the U.S. is producing more oil than Saudi Arabia and Iraq—the two countries responsible for the majority of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’ oil production—combined. OPEC cut its overall production in response to lower demand during the COVID-19 pandemic and has maintained a lower rate of output. The group of countries has threatened a few times over the past few years to take to market the barrels they have in reserve, which would tank oil prices. It is unclear if they will keep the reserves off the market indefinitely. Even incremental increases in supply could have a significant impact on price, given how low demand is on a relative basis.

“The election also raises some questions,” Yawger adds. “If we see the tariffs on China, for example, that’s probably going to tank the market even further. If there is a big disruption to the global supply chain from tariffs, the Fed[eral Reserve] could be in a position where it has to raise rates again, and that’s going to have a negative impact on price.”

Jim Burkhard, vice president and head of research for oil markets, energy and mobility at S&P Global Commodity Insights, agrees.

“Some of this is structural: China’s economy is poor, and that’s impacting demand,” Burkhard says. “Chinese consumers are also buying electric vehicles at a higher rate, and that’s keeping demand low. As a result, we don’t expect much demand growth for gas or diesel going forward.”

Burkhard adds that even while the European Union works to transition away from dependence on Russian oil, success in that regard would not necessarily result in higher oil demand. Europe imports much of its oil from the U.S. now, but not at a level that will raise prices.

“If there is any region that is committed to decarbonizing its energy supply, it’s Europe,” Burkhard says. “European economies have also been under pressure, which is keeping demand low.”

For investors with significant energy exposure, these trends are likely to keep oil trading within its current range, both men say. While that may make things seem predictable on the surface, the difference in portfolio performance between $60 oil and $70 oil, for example, could be significant.

“You can still have a lot of volatility within a range,” Yawger says.

Curves Ahead

Looking ahead, getting a clear picture of oil demand specifically—or energy demand more broadly—may be challenging.

Nicholas Bohnsack, president of Strategas Securities, says the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump has indicated it would support land sales for oil and gas drilling and for further exploration. Producers might take advantage of that, but if pricing remains flat or goes down, it may not be worthwhile.

“We might see some growth if the incoming administration brings their ‘America First’ approach to domestic manufacturing—[and] if industrial power demand grows,” Bohnsack says. “We have that as a potential investment theme for 2025 and beyond, but a lot of it depends on policy.”

Additional uncertainty stems from the fact that industry may not stick with oil. Tech companies are putting a lot of money into artificial intelligence, which requires higher electricity use. In response, companies like Microsoft are considering supporting nuclear power as an arguably more sustainable source of power. But setting up nuclear power takes a long time and can be a fraught issue in many localities.

“We could see some movement on what falls in and out of favor, policy-wise,” Bohnsack says. “We’re generally bullish on nuclear over the long term, but there are a lot of ways for environmentalists and localities to challenge the development of nuclear power sites in court. So we will have to see how that shakes out. We have tracked bipartisan support within Congress to find solutions to the growing demand for power, so that could move things forward over time.”

Sources of renewable energy like wind and solar have also come down in price, and the technology needed to support the use of these renewables on the power grid has improved. As a result, renewables are competitive on a cost and use basis, which is likely to limit some demand for fossil fuels going forward.

“Solar, in particular, is, in many cases, the lowest-cost solution right now,” Burkhard says. “Texas is the biggest producer of wind energy in the U.S.”

Even if the incoming administration is more supportive of fossil fuels than that of President Joe Biden, the move into renewables may not slow down.

“Price is the biggest regulator in the energy market, and if these sources of power remain competitive, then you’re going to see demand evolve to incorporate more of these options,” Burkhard says.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

«