Keeping Endowments Safe From Hackers

Cyberattacks on universities have soared, so university endowments are trying to catch up with other industries to ensure their portfolios are safe.

Art by Irene Servillo


Cyberattacks on universities have skyrocketed since the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2023, U.S. schools and colleges experienced a record-breaking 121 ransomware attacks, according to Comparitech—up 70% from the 71 attacks logged in 2022.

Since universities are particularly susceptible to data breaches, investment officers in charge of university endowments need to be prepared.

“Endowments are a prime target for bad guys,” says C. Todd Doss, senior managing director at the global security, investigations and compliance consulting firm Guidepost Solutions LLC. “To keep the bad guys out of the system … knowing who’s connecting to their systems is of the utmost importance.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

However, when it comes to universities’ cybersecurity hygiene, experts say the educational sector is behind other major industries and working to catch up.

Distinct Challenges

Universities face distinct cybersecurity challenges. For starters, the constant influx of new students and researchers accessing a school’s networks each year complicates data protection.

“Universities are open environments by design,” says Lou Steinberg, founder and managing partner in the digital research firm CTM Insights LLC. “It’s collaborative; it’s research; we’re supposed to work together, which frustrates security officers [and] creates opportunities for the bad actors.”

This openness, combined with budget constraints and aging infrastructure, make universities particularly vulnerable to data breaches.

“Many universities are running very thin IT budgets,” Steinberg adds. “Most universities underspend on technology because they’re focused on their product, which is either education or research.”

Lagging Behind (but Looking to Catch Up)

Shailendra Fuloria, managing director of global information technology and chief information security officer at IT services firm Nagarro, notes four key steps to maintaining proper cybersecurity: protection, detection, response and recovery. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, most organizations placed a disproportionate focus on protection. But the rise in ransomware attacks made most industries realize that “once protection is breached, they need to have a rapid detection and response mechanism, as well as a robust recovery system.”

When it comes to this four-pronged approach to maintaining strong cybersecurity practices, financial institutions—which invest heavily in cybersecurity—tend to be more proactive and better prepared to respond to attacks. Universities, by contrast, often only act after suffering a significant breach.

“The educational sector is not as far into the protection-and-detection journey as some of the more established industries,” Fuloria says. “A lot more needs to be done on the education side.”

While universities are behind many developed industries, Fuloria and other experts are seeing schools working to catch up. This effort to improve their security efforts is reflected in the increasing investment in cybersecurity technologies and strategies. John Price, CEO of the global cybersecurity firm SubRosa Cyber Solutions LLC, says he is “seeing a big interest from schools in investing in detection technologies.” Price adds that more universities are moving toward securing financial statements.

Mitigating Human Error

Maintaining strong cybersecurity is not just about dealing with attacks. Human error remains a significant vulnerability. Social engineering attacks are becoming more sophisticated, using artificial intelligence to impersonate officials or create deepfake videos. So investment offices need to make sure their staff is properly trained to prevent accidental breaches or the mishandling of sensitive information.

“Humans are going to be the biggest source of risk for an organization,” says Alastair Parr, senior vice president of global products and services at third-party risk management specialist Prevalent Inc. “They need to be trained sufficiently and generally made more aware of what people could be doing to get malicious access.”

Steinberg emphasizes the importance of multi-factor authentication and of limiting access to sensitive systems. Monitoring for unusual activity also can help detect potential breaches early.

Guidepost’s Doss explains that bad actors may compromise an email account, monitor the correspondence to identify who controls the finances and then wait for an opportune moment—like when the person is on vacation or otherwise vulnerable—to insert themselves into the conversation.

“People need to be trained on what that would look like,” Doss said. “If someone emails you and says they want to change a routing number, there should be policies in place to prevent that.”

Moreover, cyberinsurance has become a crucial component of risk management. “Cyberinsurance is becoming more mandatory,” Parr says. “There’s an expectation that you’ll have some cyber liability insurance.”

Matthieu Chan Tsin, vice president of cybersecurity services at cyberinsurance provider Cowbell Cyber Inc., emphasizes the importance of a proactive approach. “Institutions must have a comprehensive incident response plan in place before an attack occurs.”

Fuloria points out, however, that cyberinsurance is not a panacea: It helps institutions recover financially but cannot undo the reputational damage caused by data loss.

Chan Tsin also says that “insurance alone isn’t enough; it’s about minimizing risk and ensuring swift recovery.”

The Shift to Cloud and AI

With limited budgets and thin IT resources, many universities have turned to outsourcing as a means of improving their cybersecurity. The shift to cloud computing and software-as-a-service tools has allowed universities to leverage the security capabilities of specialized vendors, which often have more advanced defenses than institutions can afford on their own.

But while outsourcing can provide access to advanced security capabilities, Michael Richmond, a partner and cybersecurity and forensics services lead in EisnerAmper LLP, cautions about the risks involved.

“You may have gained technical ability, access to broader staff, with more technical acumen, but those third parties may be reliant on other third parties,” Richmond explains. “That requires some in-depth examination of their processes and their ecosystem and the services you’re actually .”

AI is also transforming both the threat landscape and defense mechanisms. While criminals use AI to automate attacks and enhance phishing scams, cybersecurity teams are using AI to improve threat detection and streamline response efforts. AI tools can process vast amounts of data and identify patterns impossible for human analysts to detect. This can help universities or other organizations quickly pinpoint vulnerabilities and mitigate threats before they become full-blown attacks.

“AI introduces more threats,” says Parr. “But as for the positives, this technology is enabling organizations to do more with less money.”

As university endowments navigate cybersecurity challenges, experts emphasize adhering to fundamental principles.

“At the end of the day, cybersecurity best practices are cybersecurity best practices,” says EisnerAmper’s Richmond. “If you’re not laying down those processes, you’re setting yourself up for failure.”

Related Stories:

How Investors, Public Companies View SEC’s Cybersecurity Disclosure Requirements

Keeping Endowments Safe From Hackers

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sovereign Sophistication is Increasing

Macro forces and long-term investment horizons are pushing sovereign wealth funds to move portfolios into private markets and adopt new structures.



Sovereign wealth funds have experienced a bit more volatility than they are used to over the past two years. Rising rates and inflation hit sovereign portfolios like they have all others and these funds have also felt the pullback in private equity activity as well as the fluctuations of U.S. equities.

According to Invesco’s recent sovereign asset management survey, sovereign funds underperformed broadly in 2022, but rebounded strongly in 2023. The data for 2024 is not in yet, but sources say that sovereign funds are refocusing on diversification and are willing to take on a bit more risk where they can get a premium for it.

Moving an aircraft carrier

Sovereign wealth funds are not known for being the most tactical asset allocators – they have large budgets and very long investment horizons, but when market regimes shift significantly – so do they.

“We’ve been pulling back from U.S. stocks for quite some time – we started in 2017,” explains Vince Smith, CIO at the New Mexico State Investment Council. “We’re at what I think is our lowest exposure at 17-18%. We’ve redeployed that capital as much as we can into private markets. We’ve increased our exposure to private credit and we like the value we’re finding in international equities.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The shift into private markets is part of a larger effort within New Mexico SIC. More money has been coming into the fund than going out and they have a lot of cash on hand. According to the investment plan presented to the Council last week, the goal is to continue to increase exposure into private markets across asset classes over the next several years. So far, the private credit portfolio, for example, has 57 partnerships with a market value of approximately $4 billion. SIC has been active in private credit year to date, including in new real assets partnerships, and is continuing toward reaching its full target allocation.

These shifts echo those of other sovereign wealth funds. 62% of SWF respondents to the Invesco survey said that they were taking a closer look at international equities and increasing exposure. Fifty-six percent of respondents said their funds were invested in private credit instruments and a further 30% said they were involved in direct and/or co-investments.

Smith says SIC benchmarks itself against a group of approximately 36 funds across the U.S. that it considers to be peer funds including other sovereign wealth funds like the Alaska Permanent Fund. “On average those 36 funds have an expected volatility of about 12%,” he says. “Our expected volatility is about 14% so we take a little more investment risk and the primary place we take it is in private markets.”

SIC works on a time horizon of 7-10 years with its investment plans, which aligns it well with typical lockup periods for traditional private equity and more recently private credit. “When we look at the big sovereign wealth funds within the U.S. all of us are moving more toward private markets and taking on a bit more risk. I think that’s a trend that is likely to continue.”

These moves largely track with how Marcus Frampton, CIO at the Alaska Permanent Fund, thinks about diversification. He anticipates that institutional portfolios could see a fairly significant shift in drivers of performance. “The past ten years have been defined by outsized returns in U.S. equities and private equity and I don’t think we’re going to see that to the same extent over the next decade,” he says.

Frampton is more constructive on fixed income, which accounts for 20% of the portfolio as well as private markets more broadly. “I don’t know if our 20% allocation to fixed income is high or low relative to peers but we are seeing value from it. Our absolute return program – which is hedge funds – has been a positive for us as well. Everyone does hedge funds differently; our portfolio is largely macro managers and market-neutral equity. We also have some gold investments – we are big believers in gold,” he says.

Increasing partnerships

Frampton adds that he’s seeing more sovereign wealth funds show up together in deals and announce partnerships. “I started noticing it first in biotech venture. We’ve been active there over the past decade and 10 years ago no one was in it. But over the past few years the number of funds you see on the cap table in a series A or B has increased,” he says. “People have taken their lumps lately in biotech venture, but I think this is a trend we’re going to see continue.”

Rod Ringrow, head of official institutions at Invesco, agrees. He says more sovereign wealth funds are adopting partnership models. “We see it with the larger funds in particular, where they build a relationship with an asset manager or real estate firm, usually in relation to a specific asset class. Those partnerships provide opportunities for co-investment for both parties. We’ve also seen a number of sovereign funds working together on particular transactions. We think that is likely to continue.”

The economics of partnerships are typically more favorable than paying an external manager all of the fees associated with investing in a traditional commingled fund. Sovereign wealth funds may also be able to deploy more capital as a co- or anchor investor than they would in a commingled fund.

Sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East have recently emerged as key benefactors for AI companies. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar have all put more money into tech companies as a means of diversification, according to data from PitchBook. In March, sovereign wealth fund Mubadala launched a $100 billion artificial intelligence-focused investment vehicle called MGX. That fund got a stake in OpenAI’s September fundraising round. MGX is also working with BlackRock and Microsoft on a data center project.

Competing for talent

While the partnership model has a lot of benefits for sovereign wealth funds and helps them improve portfolio diversification it also means they are competing with asset managers for the internal talent that helps them participate in partnership transactions.

Claude Shaw, managing partner at consulting and advisory firm Egon Zehnder, advises sovereign wealth funds and says many of his clients are looking for professionals that have had direct experience with underwriting transactions to support their co- and direct investment teams. But it’s not easy. “Sovereign wealth funds have advantages because they aren’t going out and fundraising every year so they can just focus on investing, but they don’t pay carry. That’s a big source of value for private equity professionals,” he explains. “They have other compensation of course, but there are some tradeoffs.”

Frampton says Alaska’s willingness to offer things like remote work is helping them attract new talent but notes that it has been a struggle in the past. “We’re all looking for the same types of people,” he says.

Smith agrees. He says the SIC will likely have to double the size of its investment staff over the next several years. “We’re growing really quickly,” he says. “Our fund inflows have been very high so we have more cash to put to work and we will need more people for that. We are actively recruiting, and we do think it’s an advantage that people in the market can see us growing.”

Ringrow says that the willingness of sovereign wealth funds to develop their talent internally can often make them attractive places to work. “These are increasingly sophisticated investors. As new funds are created, we will see a bigger presence from sovereign wealth funds in the global capital markets, both in terms of economic activity but also playing a role in human capital development” he says.

The next decade may also prove to be a bit of a test for sovereign wealth funds and their teams. Frampton says he expects if not a recession, at least a significant economic slowdown at some point in the next five to ten years. If that happens, internal investment teams could find themselves under pressure.

“There is a fair bit of data that shows that in private equity, for example, you’re not really getting the premium you might expect unless you’re invested in top quartile managers and everyone thinks they are top quartile. If we have some type of reset or drawdown, it’s going to be fairly evident who was in the top quartile and who wasn’t,” he says.

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

«