Investors Start to Welcome Non-Animal Protein

Plant-based sources move onto the table to supplant beef and its ilk.

Art by Klaus Kremmerz


Getting food from farm to fork has always been a societal imperative. But big challenges loom due to expanding populations, less arable land and freshwater supply constraints. Overcoming those is the problem facing the nutrition and agriculture industries. For investors, that means an opportunity for solid and likely enduring, if not spectacular, gains from new sources of protein: plants.

“A growing global population needs to be fed, and there are less resources to do so,” says Gillian Diesen, a senior client portfolio manager for thematic equities at Pictet Asset Management, in an interview. Hunger affected 828 million people worldwide as of 2022, the World Health Organization stated. At the same time, among well-fed populations, Diesen adds, poor diet (think fast food) and obesity are hazards.

The world’s population is expected to increase to 10 billion from 8 billion over the next 30 years, the United Nations calculates. Arable land has decreased by one-third since 1961 to 5.3 million square miles, owing to climate change and deforestation for real estate development, per the World Population Review. While the amount of freshwater has stayed constant over time, the burgeoning population means less is available to go around.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“We need more healthy products that people are willing to consume,” says Kevin Dreyer, co-CIO at Gabelli Funds and co-manager of its Gabelli Health & Wellness Fund, which is up 5.6% annually over the past five years, as compared with 14.3% for the Standard & Poor’s 500. In addition to medical companies, his fund includes health-minded food providers like Danone (yogurt) and Treehouse Foods (organic and gluten-free snacks)

Alternative Proteins

The quest for expanding beyond traditional sources—such as protein from livestock like cattle—is drawing investor interest, with an emphasis on “alternative proteins” that come from plants. A big plus is that this shift would bring a reduction in carbon emissions, as the need for livestock (which infamously emit their own gas) would drop. Raising livestock also entails a lot of water use.

The Boston Consulting Group estimated that the market for alternative proteins will reach $290 billion in sales by 2035, up from around $8 billion now. In a report, the firm noted, “This will represent 11% of global protein consumption, and the impact on climate change would be equivalent to decarbonizing 95% of the aviation industry.”

In the alternative protein realm, much of investors’ capital is directed at small, non-public companies. For instance, the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board in 2021 led a $226 million capital raise for food company Motif FoodWorks, which makes plant-based food meant to resemble meat.

Motif produces beef, chicken and pork substitutes that, in promotional material, it touts as “the same meaty, umami flavor and juicy texture as the real thing” (“umami” means a taste found in cooked meats). A bonus: Medical research has found that plant-based protein is lower in cholesterol than animal protein.

Food Investing

Family-owned farms continue to dominate the U.S. agricultural landscape, controlling more than 95% of total acreage, which makes investing in this asset class hard. Nonetheless, food companies, farm equipment makers and other nutrition businesses provide ample places to invest as food tilts more toward plants.

Among the biggest agriculture owners are very wealthy people: the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, media magnate John Malone and real estate developer Stan Kroenke. The Gates Foundation owns 241,000 farm acres spread across 19 states, from California to North Carolina. Although he is a well-known cheeseburger fan, Bill Gates is an enthusiastic proponent of synthetic meat.

The Gates organization last year joined forces with the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the pharma firm’s philanthropic arm, to invest $29 million in an effort to convert CO2 gas into acetate that would in turn yield proteins. Bill Gates was an early investor in alternative meat companies, including Impossible Foods, Beyond Meat and Upside Foods.

Supplementing standard, animal-derived food is increasingly popular among investors. Take BellRing Brands, a small ($6.7 billion market cap) food business that Dreyer’s fund invests in. The company’s stock has tripled in value over the past five years as its revenue and earnings have climbed.

BellRing has a line of plant-based products, including its Premier Protein Plant powder (often mixed with water or milk) that is made from peanut and rice protein. “They are doing well,” said fund manager Dreyer. “Two-thirds of their sales are at Wal-Mart and Costco,” and they have “room for further expansion.”

Institutional investors have taken notice of sustainable farm and nutrition investing. Canada’s Public Sector Pension Investment Board, the retirement fund for public employees, as of May was the biggest investor in Australia’s agricultural sector, totaling $4.9 billion. PSP’s holdings down under are not strong on livestock, with concentration on egg producer Ellerslie Free Range Farms and grain grower Timberscombe.

Meat Risk

Farming itself can be made more sustainable. The largest maker of farming equipment globally is Deere & Co., also known as John Deere, with one-quarter of the market by sales. A large part of its product offerings is made up of tractors, harvesting combines, field sprayers and the like. One innovation it has pioneered is “precision spraying” to counter pests and fungus by chemicals sprayed directly on the plants, a much more efficient method, according to Pictet’s Diesen. “Farmers don’t have to spray an entire field,” she said.

The stock has doubled over the past five years, with revenue up 18% over the past fiscal year (ending in October) and earnings ahead 42%. More than half its stock is owned by institutions, mainly large asset managers such as the Vanguard Group.

Meat-based food enterprises may even be riskier investments than plant-based. Among the leading food-producing companies is Tyson Foods, a major pork, chicken and beef provider. Its stock has dipped 25% over five years, amid flat revenue for the last couple of years   and red ink.

General Mills, on the other hand, has performed decently in the market, with shares ahead 24% over the past five years, and sales and earnings down slightly for the year ending in May. The company is not as dependent on meat, with its focus on pet food and snacks—Cheerios cereal, Haagen-Dazs ice cream and Pillsbury baking goods. Analysts are optimistic. As Morningstar strategist Kristoffer Inton wrote, “In many categories, General Mills has not only the top brand but also several leading brands that together create a dominant companywide share.” 

For investors, it is cheering that such companies have long track records and good financials. “They are well-established,” pointed out Pictet’s Diesen.

Related Stories:

Why the Largest Allocators Are Focusing on Agriculture

Are the Original Growth Investments, Agriculture and Timber, Worth It?

The Alpha Opportunities of Declining Biodiversity


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Alpha Opportunities of Declining Biodiversity

How institutional investors are starting to navigate the challenges of natural capital investments.

Art by Klaus Kremmerz

 


More than half of the world’s total gross domestic product—$44 trillion—is moderately or highly dependent on nature, yet humanity has caused the loss of 83% of all wild mammals and half of all plants on earth.

Biodiversity loss is accelerating due to climate change and land-use impacts. Based on the GDP impact, in 2020, the World Economic Forum named ecosystem collapse as a top-five global economic risk in terms of both likelihood and level of impact through 2030.

Following a December 2022 meeting of 188 governmental representatives in Montreal to create the Global Biodiversity Framework, which aims to conserve and manage 30% of the world’s lands and water, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem functions, by 2030. The European Union in 2024 adopted a law to restore at least 20% of the region’s vulnerable areas by 2030.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

With sudden urgency to consider biodiversity as a new environmental metric and stave off continued nature-based loss, asset owners and managers are seeking ways to incorporate the metric into their investments. It is not easy to do, however. Compared to other responsible investing topics such as corporate governance and climate change, biodiversity is still in its infancy, says Asha Khoenkhoen, a spokesperson for the $545 billion Dutch pension fund Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP.

Long-time sustainable investors say approaching biodiversity as an investment theme is complex, nuanced, and its specific impact is difficult to measure. Instead, they suggest looking at outcomes as one way to measure impact and results.

 

Challenges to Incorporating Natural Capital Investments

Earlier this year, ABP announced 30 billion euros ($32.67 billion) in impact investment goals, allocating about 1 billion euros to natural capital and biodiversity. The pension fund is exploring potential opportunities in public and private land-based investments focused on agricultural technology but has not announced anything specifically, she says.

“Investable opportunities that contribute to nature and biodiversity are more difficult to find,” Khoenkhoen says.

Robert-Alexandre Poujade, an ESG analyst and the biodiversity lead at BNP Paribas Asset Management, concurs. The 2022 biodiversity framework set the scene, but “there is a lot of interpretation to do on the business side to see how we can really embed those (frameworks) into our decision making,” he says.

 

Making Agriculture and Food Production More Biodiverse

Agriculture contributes 30% of greenhouse gas emissions due to chemical inputs and animal waste, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. According to the World Bank, cultivating crops uses 70% of global freshwater. Reducing both emissions and water use can make food production more sustainable and lower biodiversity loss.

Colin Butterfield, managing partner and CEO of investment advisory firm Solum Partners, which focuses on agriculture and food production, is excited to see institutional investors learning about the asset class, but says they are too focused on hard data metrics to justify whether something is sustainable and by how much.

“Unfortunately, the equation is not that simple,” Butterfield says. Agriculture projects vary by geographies and every project is different. “You’re dealing with nature.”

Instead, he says institutional investors should start by focusing on specific projects and looking closely at what people are doing, such as improving soil health to encourage microorganisms to thrive and using modern irrigation techniques.

Institutions must think for the long term when investing in sustainable agricultural themes and reconsider how to review results. Since there are no standard biodiversity metrics, it is easier to measure other outcomes, such as reduced pesticide use, reduced water usage and higher crop yields.

Butterfield says Solum invests in themes that shape how humans eat. One theme is super foods, and the firm invests in avocadoes, berries and olive-oil producers. He gets his ideas at the grocer.

“Nothing makes me happier than being in a supermarket fresh produce area and understanding what are the trends, what are the dynamics,” he says.

Clare Wood, a portfolio specialist at sustainable asset manager Stewart Investors, says some Indian companies are making strides to help farmers improve biodiversity, pointing to Indian health and wellness company Marico Ltd. as an example. It is the largest buyer of India’s coconuts and works with farmers to help mitigate the impact of coconut monocropping by encouraging farmers to use intercropping and other sustainable farming practices.

By improving yields, farmers can grow more on the same plot, and advances in agriculture technology can reduce biodiversity loss, says Beth Williamson, head of sustainable equity research and associate portfolio manager at Calamos Investments. She points to farm machinery company Deere & Co. as a leading example. Its strip-till product line reduces soil disruption and helps farmers target crop areas to lower the amount of chemicals applied to farmlands.

 

Sustainable Agriculture Requires Patience

Regenerative farmland and timberland investing may have portfolio benefits and similar characteristics as other land assets, such as being uncorrelated to traditional markets and a natural inflation hedge. However, asset managers say investors need to be patient, particularly in this niche.

Eric Hsueh, director of investments at Veris Wealth Partners, a financial advisory firm that invests in sustainable farming and timberland, says farmers who transition to more biodiverse practices may spend three to five years moving to organic or regenerative farming from traditional agriculture. As farm managers work on building soil health, they may not produce any income, so they may depend on money from investments that will not return anything during that time.

“That long-term capital and patient capital is absolutely critical,” he says.

Veris invests with a few managers who provide financial and technical support to farmers making the switch, such as Potlikker Capital, which serves farmers who are people of color by offering access to higher-value markets and resources to use regenerative farming practices, and Dirt Capital, which offers financial support to make farming more affordable.

Lending is an indirect way to support biodiversity. Hsueh says Veris has put clients’ cash in money-market funds in mission-oriented community banks, credit unions and community development financial institutions funds that work with farmers. “It’s a less obvious asset class that’s also interesting,” he says. “It’s low risk, but also market-rate capital that’s also very place-based.”

Related Stories:

Why the Largest Allocators Are Focusing on Agriculture

Investors Start to Welcome Non-Animal Protein

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

«