Quantitative Easing a ‘Faustian Bargain,’ Says Guggenheim CIO

Central banks may have inadvertently traded their control over inflation for the current low interest rates and eased money supply, according to Scott Minerd of Guggenheim Partners.

(August 22, 2012) – Central banks made deals with the devil when they tried to print and spend their way out of the last recession, according to Scott Minerd, chief investment officer at the asset management firm Guggenheim Partners.    

“By abandoning monetary orthodoxy and pursuing large-scale asset purchases, global central banks have increased the risk of inflation and compromised their ability to stamp it out,” Minerd argues in a new paper entitled “The Faustian Bargain” after Goethe’s 19th century drama. 

In Minerd’s analogy, Ben Bernanke and other central bank chiefs take the roll of Goethe’s bankrupt emperor, and their actions threaten to have similarly disastrous consequences.

“Unlikely as it seems in a world of zero-bound interest rates, someday, as the economy continues to expand, the demand for credit will increase to the point that interest rates will begin to rise,” Minerd writes. “As interest rates rise, the market value of the Federal Reserve’s assets will fall…This could leave the Federal Reserve without enough liquid assets to sell to protect the purchasing power of the dollar, resulting in a downward spiral in its value.” 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Institutional investors can hedge against a potential fall in the purchasing power of the US dollar by allocating funds into real assets, such as commodities and real estate, according to Minerd. Asset managers should let go of US Treasury bonds—which he suggests are “shifting from representing risk-free return to ‘return-free risk’”—in favor of high-yield debt and European equities. 

“Inordinately higher leverage ratios and the extension of central bank portfolio duration means governments now face the potential for central bank solvency crises,” Minerd concludes. “It is too early to predict exactly how this Faustian bargain will play out; but, with each additional paper note that rolls off the printing press or gets conjured up in the ether, the likelihood of a happy ending becomes increasingly evanescent.”

Minerd is not the first high-profile CIO to criticize central banks’ policies of low interest rates and quantitative easing. In July, Pacific Investment Management Company’s Mohamed El-Erian argued that rock-bottom interest rates hurt institutional investors without lifting the global economy. “Lower borrowing costs are not enough to convince companies to expand given the [current] list of domestic, regional and global uncertainties,” he asserted. 

Minerd’s entire paper is available here

Swedish, US Pensions Lead 'London Whale' Lawsuit

JP Morgan provided false information, hiding the real nature of the trades that caused a colossal trading loss at the bank, a group of pension funds have alleged.

(August 22, 2012) — A range of public pension funds based in the United States and Sweden are lead plaintiffs in a group lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co. over trading losses in a credit derivative portfolio led by its London-based chief investment officer.

Swedish fund Sjunde AP-Fonden (AP7) along with five US public schemes, have alleged that they lost up to $52 million as a result of fraudulent activities caused by JP Morgan’s chief investment office and trader Bruno Iksil, also known as the ‘London Whale’.

US District Judge George Daniels decided to consolidate the swath of suits against the bank into one class action, naming the six pension funds as the lead plaintiffs, Bloomberg initially reported. The lead plaintiffs named include the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Ohio Public Employee Retirement System, School Employees Retirement System of Ohio, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Oregon Public Employee Retirement Fund and AP7.

In July, Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan’s chief executive officer, said the firm had lost $5.8 billion due to a trading scandal.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The latest lawsuit against JP Morgan comes after the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System sued the bank in November claiming breach of fiduciary duty by its directors. On August 2011, the bank agreed to pay the US Treasury $88.3 million to resolve violations of sanctions on Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Liberia, along with measures aimed at thwarting the support of terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. In the complaint, the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System asserted that the board “embraced or recklessly disregarded the company-wide business strategy based on repeated and systematic violations of federal law.”

“The misconduct occurred, unchecked, under the defendants’ watch because of their complicity in the improprieties alleged herein,” the pension fund said in the complaint. “Because of its acquiescence in the scheme, JPMC’s board cannot be disinterested and independent.”

«