What Does Moody’s Bad Outlook for 3 Key BDCs Mean for Private Credit?

Maybe not much. The business development company stock index has kept climbing, regardless.

Private credit is increasing in popularity, as allocators continue their shift toward alternatives. The economy also is growing nicely, which bodes well for keeping defaults at bay.

Still, Moody’s Ratings delivered some disquieting news last week about one corner of private credit, business development companies, where overall returns have been good. The ratings agency assigned negative outlooks to three of the more celebrated such vehicles, noted for their size and parentage: FS KKR Capital Corp. (the second largest BDC by assets, $15.5 billion), Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. (12th largest at $3 billion) and BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (26th, $1.6 billion).

Offsetting Moody’s downbeat assessment: All these three publicly traded stocks rose last week, bad news be damned. KKR climbed 1.9%, Oaktree 2.4% and BlackRock 1.2%.

Moreover, the news has not troubled the rest of the BDC publicly traded space. The S&P BDC Index also shrugged off the Moody’s assessment as the index continued to advance during the week.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

In fact, the index, which had a good year in 2023, up 15%, is ahead 3.3% this year through last Friday. That is slightly better than junk bonds, at 3.1% in 2024, and the Bloomberg U.S. Agg, which covers investment-grade bonds, at negative 3.1%. Fixed income is in a wait-and-see mode as long-expected Federal Reserve rate decreases are on hold.

All three of the BDCs that Moody’s warned about sport Baa3 ratings, the last tier above junk status. A high-yield rating would mean loftier borrowing costs for these BDCs. This marks the first such negative outlook for private credit by Moody’s since 2020. Oaktree declined to comment, and the other two did not respond to requests for their reaction.

While Moody’s stated that they all are handling their lending operations well, it pointed to a worrisome rise in their non-accrual loans, meaning those where borrowers have fallen behind on interest payments. James Morrow, founder and chief executive of Callodine Capital Management, an investor in public BDCs, told Bloomberg that he attributed the rise in non-accruals to higher interest rates, which do not appear likely to fall anytime soon.

In the fourth quarter, these laggard borrowings doubled at the three BDCs, and stood at 6.4% of loans outstanding for KKR, 4.5% for Oaktree and 1.2% for BlackRock. One example is a $47 million Oaktree loan to online retailer Thrasio LLC, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in February.

For KKR, Moody’s commented that it downgraded the private credit vehicle “to negative from stable based on the BDC’s asset quality deterioration and its effect on earnings and capital strength.” 

BDCs are closed-end investment companies that invest in small and medium-sized privately held businesses and offer rich annual dividend yields, which S&P Dow Jones Indices place at an average 10.2%, far above the S&P 500’s 1.3% and junk bonds’ 8.1%. The trio that Moody’s warned about yields higher than the BDC average, with KKR at 14.3%, Oaktree at 11.3% and BlackRock at 16.5%.

Related Stories:

BDC Stocks Soar by 12.8% in 2023, Despite Risks

Asset Managers See Further Potential in Private Credit Market

Why Private Credit May Not Be as Good as It Looks

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Shareholder Activists Call for Removal of ExxonMobil CEO

Asset owners seek to block ExxonMobil appointments. 



A shareholder proposal from Wespath Benefits and Investments and Mercy Investment Services calls for shareholders to reject the appointments of a number of ExxonMobil executives, alleging the company has retaliated against shareholders
in an SEC filing filed on April 18 

The proxy exempt solicitation asks investors to reject the appointment of CEO Darren W. Woods and Jay L. Hooley, lead independent director and nominating and governance chair. Investors will vote on proposal at the company’s annual meeting on May 29.  

The exempt solicitation states that ExxonMobil retaliated against shareholders Arjuna Capital and Follow This, which filed a proxy resolution with the company to discuss carbon emissions. The solicitation alleges that Exxon sued to “silence constructive discussion of its strategy.” That lawsuit was filed in January 2024.  

The solicitation encourages shareholders to vote against incumbent nominees Darren W. Woods and Joseph L. Hooley due to their oversight of the company’s hostile treatment of shareholders, including recent legal action taken by the company against its own investors. Exxon’s recent hostility toward shareholders comes amid continued shareholder concerns regarding the company’s management of climate-related risks,” Wespath said in a press release. 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Wespath is a pension system for the United Methodist Church, with more than 100,000 members and $26 billion in assets under management As of March 31, 2024, Wespath owned 319,342 shares of ExxonMobil, valued at $37,120,314. Mercy Investment Services is a ministry of the Sisters of Mercy of the Americas and is an impact investor who has strong involvement in proxy voting. 

“We support Exxon in its goal to responsibly grow long-term investor value. However, CEO Darren W. Woods and Lead Director Jay L. Hooley have demonstrated disdain for the voice of shareholders and are willing to use the threat of lawsuits to silence them. Hence, we urge shareholders to vote AGAINST Mr. Woods and Mr. Hooley,” the proposal concluded.  

On April 22, the Interfaith Council on Corporate Responsibility filed a proxy exempt solicitation against ExxonMobil, accusing the company of retaliating against ICCR and other proxies for raising concerns about the company’s energy transition plans. 

“As fiduciaries, ICCR members are keenly interested in the long-term financial success of the companies held in their portfolios, including ExxonMobil. Given the increasing urgency of the climate crisis and the systemic risks from climate change inherent in ExxonMobil’s fossil fuel business, many if not most proposals have highlighted the importance of setting the meaningful decarbonization targets necessary to put the company on a more sustainable energy path.” ICCR stated in a press release. 

Related Stories: 

The Exxon Vote: Pension Supporters Stay Onboard to Advance Change

Proxy Voters, ESG Groups Continue to Face Congressional Scrutiny 

Shareholder Proposals Increase, Yet Few Gain a Majority 

Tags: , , , , , ,

«