Inflation Hedging in the Age of QE-Infinity

Hint: Inflation-indexed bonds aren't the whole solution, says one top researcher.

(November 8, 2012) – Investors, institutional and otherwise, have not recalibrated their inflation hedging strategies to a post-2008 economy, and one French researcher believes it’s about time they did. 

“Considering the overwhelming debt overhang problem which looms over most sovereign issuers from industrialized countries, it is becoming increasingly clear that inflations will eventually be the last available weapon left in the state’s arsenal to fight bulging balance-sheets,” argues Nicolas Fulli-Lemaire in a whitepaper. He holds a PhD in economics, and is a research analyst at Amundi, the subsidiary asset management firm for Société Générale and Crédit Agricole. 

“In truth, there is no silver bullet: inflation is solely linked to explicitly inflation-linked securities such as linked bonds or swaps,” Full-Lemaire writes. “All other asset classes have only time-varying hedging capabilities and therefore offer limited protection.” 

Inflation volatility is higher now than it has been previously, and interest rates lower, making the conventional strategy of inflation-indexed bonds less appealing. Furthermore, Fulli-Lemaire notes that high demand for the small number of linked bonds available in the European marketplace puts a premium on the debt, even as long-term real interest rates have dipped under 0%. 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

For investors with sufficiently long time horizons, which institutional funds typically have, Fulli-Lemaire advises hedging against core inflation, as opposed to headline. “The obvious pitfall of this methodology is that to this date, no core inflation-linked asset exists,” the author points out. A pitfall, indeed. 

However, Fulli-Lemaire does propose a solution for the long-term investors looking to cushion against inflation: a new derivative

“To make-up for the lack of an investable asset, we could go forward by imagining a core versus headline inflation swap that would see long-term players receive a fixed rate for the spread between headline and core inflation and short-term players be on the other end of the trade.” 

Full-Lemaire is one of a number of finance/economics experts engaged with the inflation hedging question. As Quantitative Easing has become a household term, research into hedging tactics has also spiked. 

An article in the Journal of Alternative Investments detailed a robust study of infrastructure and inflation, and found the former did not live up to its reputation as a solid hedge. In fact, “infrastructure overall as well as its subsectors telecommunication, transport, and utilities hedge inflation neither particularly well nor any better than equities,” write authors Maximilian Rödel and Cristoph Rothballer of the Technische Universität München, Germany. “Only portfolios of infrastructure firms with high pricing power exhibit a slightly superior (yet not statistically significant) hedging quality at a five-year investment horizon.” Consequently, investors should “depart from the belief that infrastructure generally provides a natural hedge,” Rödel and Rothballer conclude. 

Read Full-Lemaire’s full paper, “Alternative Inflation Hedging Portfolio Strategies: Going Forward under Immoderate Macroeconomics,” here.

Want Investment Freedom? Head to the Nordics

As the financial storm batters Europe, some regulators have eased investors’ pain while others have added to it, a research firm reports.

(November 8, 2012) — Financial regulators in the Nordics have helped investors through the financial crisis while their counterparts in the rest of Europe have tied the hands of those they were meant to protect, a leading research firm has claimed.

Investors in Denmark and Finland found solace with their financial controllers as the crisis worsened, a report from Greenwich Associates said this week. Danish pension funds were allowed to alter how they used the discount yield curve to measure liabilities as government bond yields fell, while Finland made changes to its solvency requirements so to avoid forced selling of equities by institutional investors.

Large investors based in Western and Southern Europe were not so lucky. European Union-wide regulation including Solvency II and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive (AIFMD), although not yet implemented have been casting a shadow across the continent and most financial regulators have done little to ease the burden.  

“Regulations and regulatory uncertainty have caused institutions throughout much of Continental Europe to put off or limit alterations to investment strategies that would diversify their portfolios away from European government bonds and other fixed-income investments,” said Greenwich Associates consultant Marc Haynes. “In order to truly guarantee the long-term solvency of Europe’s institutions, it may be time for politicians and regulators to consider some regulatory relief.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Greenwich Associates said large insurance companies across the continent, the asset allocation of which is predominantly fixed income, cited Solvency II as the main impediment to the risk-taking in their portfolios.

Low interest rates have hit these investors and some have declared that they cannot pay out minimum returns on collective pension insurance contracts due to poor investment earnings.

Some large French pension funds told the research firm that they were shifting their domiciles to Belgium or Luxembourg, which they viewed as having more supportive regimes for pension schemes that were struggling with funding levels.

In the Netherlands, the financial regulator moved to allow pension funds to measure their liabilities on a three-month time frame, but investors with falling funding levels have claimed this is still too short.

In the UK, retirement funds have also been hoarding high levels of fixed-income assets, according to the country’s Pensions Regulator. Yesterday, an update on investment portfolios showed the proportion of gilts and fixed interest in UK pension fund portfolios rose to 43.2% from 40.1% in 2011.

In the UK, Quantitative Easing has pushed down gilt yields, which has in turn pushed up pension fund liabilities.

Greenwich concluded that “basic maths” showed steps like those taken in the Nordics would be required across the rest of Europe. “Simply put: Underfunded pension plans and struggling insurance companies will not be able to meet their funding requirements in the current investment environment without the flexibility to add appropriate levels of risk to their portfolios.”

«