SEC Posts 100% Returns

The SEC levied more than $3 billion in fines in FY 2012, double its $1.5 billion budget.

(November 15, 2012) – It is too bad investors can’t buy shares of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

The regulatory agency returned double its budget in fiscal year 2012, levying fines totaling more than $3 billion. Of course, those fines go to wronged parties, not the SEC itself, which has nevertheless had an active and successful year. 

“The record of performance is a testament to the professionalism and perseverance of the staff and the innovative reforms put in place over the past few years,” said SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro in a statement. “We’ve now brought more enforcement actions in each of the last two years than ever before including some of the most complex cases we’ve ever seen.” 

It filed 734 enforcement actions in the year ending September 30, 2012—just shy of 2011’s record-breaking 735. This year’s total included more major and highly complex cases than ever, such as the insider trading charges against former McKinsey & Co. global head Rajat Gupta for tipping off convicted hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“It’s not simply numbers, but the increasing complexity and diversity of the cases we file that shows how successful we’ve been,” said Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC’s enforcement division. “The intelligence, dedication, and deep experience of our enforcement staff are, more than any other factors, responsible for the Division’s success.” 

Judging by the SEC’s budget for fiscal year 2013, the numbers and scale of regulatory action are only set to grow. The House of Representatives is controlled by the Republican Party, which tends to advocate for small government and limited regulation–but Congress has approved a $245 million increase to the commission’s current $1.5 billion budget. This will support an additional 676 positions over the current staffing levels, according to government documents. 

Still, legislators are seeing the financial regulator as money well spent—particularly because most of its budget comes from fees on securities transactions. Seven years ago, the SEC’s funding was sufficient to provide nineteen examiners for each trillion dollars in investment adviser assets under management, according to the SEC’s report to Congress justifying its 2013 budget. Now, there are ten examiners per trillion dollars. 

“A number of financial firms spend many times more each year on their technology budgets alone than the SEC spends on all of its operations,” the report says. “Similarly, our enforcement teams bring cases against firms that spend more on lawyers’ fees than the agency’s annual operating budget.”

How a SWF Picks a Hedge Fund – The Inside Track

Are you a hedge fund manager wanting to take on SWF assets? It’s not just your performance they are after, a former CIO has revealed.

(November 14, 2012) – Alternative asset managers targeting sovereign wealth fund (SWF) money have to be much more than alpha-generators, a former CIO has revealed.

Scott Kalb, who recently completed a term as CIO of the Korean Investment Corporation (KIC), said in a backstage interview with sector specialist Opalesque TV this month that picking any manager involved a long and detailed process, but when dealing with alternatives firms, investors had to be especially careful.

Kalb said: “You’re not in public markets, you’re investing as an LP and so you have an LP-GP relationship. You have to set up a process that’s looking at things like track record, staffing, management. You have to look at not only past performance but also strategy, systems, risk management – you have to look at everything soup-to-nuts and vet the process completely. It usually takes three-to-six months to select a manager, so it’s a long process. You have to make sure you see them on the ground and make a thorough evaluation.”

Before joining the KIC, Kalb worked for several investment banks, asset and alternative managers in the global markets. The SWF was founded in 2005 and has around $43 billion in assets.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The diversity in SWFs means there is little similarity in the asset allocation strategies among the group. However the size of the assets and usual sophistication of the investment committee means most will have some allocation to alternative assets.

“My belief is that if you are going to invest in hedge funds, for example, you may as well start from the top down rather than bottom-up and that is I believe in working with large, well-known, well-established firms,” Kalb said. “I don’t mind if they have lots of assets under management, I have found that even managers with lots of assets under management can continue to perform very well.”

Over the past 18 months there has been a shift within the investor community, with a surge of assets being allocated to larger hedge fund managers.

“Some people believe that smaller, more nimble managers can get you better returns, but I think in the alternative space, it’s not just about returns,” said Kalb. “Returns are a requirement – it’s what gets you in the game. Besides that, a lot of what you need to see is around the quality of the platform, the people, the infrastructure – you need a deep team to be comfortable to invest in them.”

Kalb said the days of a “couple of guys” running money in a simple set up were over.

“These days what you need is a partnership so you want to invest with firms that are not only going to make returns for you, but are going to be able to provide you with information and software, who are going to be able to help you to understand what is going on in the markets and help you to be a better investor.”

To watch the full interview, click here

«