The Risk/Return Sweet Spot: 7-Yr US Treasuries, Says Study

One finance researcher has tracked the Treasury yield curve, finding optimal risk-adjusted returns at 7-year maturities.

(February 4, 2013) – Yields on United States Treasury bills have dropped overall since the financial crisis of 2008, but canny investors can optimize their allocations to this safe haven by choosing duration wisely. 

Five- and seven-year government bonds deliver the optimal risk-adjusted returns, finance professor Charles Corcoran found during his study of yields over the last forty months. The least attractive risk/return tradeoff is on the 30-year treasury, just as it was pre-2008, he asserts. 

“Interest rates on treasury bonds of all maturities have dropped significantly in the past seven years,” Corcoran writes in his paper, “Yield Curve Investing: Optimizing Risk-Adjusted Returns,” which was recently published in the Global Journal of Business Research. “With the new, lower interest rate environment, the relative risk versus return tradeoff, as measured by risk-adjusted return, has likewise changed. 

Compared with one-year securities, which were the pre-2008 risk/return sweet spot, he found that the five- and seven-year terms now offer a tradeoff: “The steeper yield curve provides incremental returns exceeding the increased duration risk with these maturities. The 30-year bond, while offering the greatest nominal yield for all months when traded, is also subject relatively high interest rate risk, rendering the 30-year a poor value on a risk-adjusted basis.” 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Investors have continued to sink assets into US treasuries despite the low-interest rates, which Corcoran characterizes as a “whisker above zero,” in part due to tightness in the corporate bond market and volatility in global markets overall. 

Read the entire paper here.

Study: DB Pensions Face Dismal Fate With Actuarial Negligence

Actuaries charged with risk management in the financial sector have ignored the biggest risks facing defined benefit pensions, and it could be too late, one report asserts.

(February 4, 2013) — The pension industry is under intense pressure due to ignorance among actuaries in their assessment of climate change and resource scarcity, according to a report.

The research published by the Global Sustainability Institute at Anglia Ruskin University shows that actuaries have turned a blind eye to assessing such risk factors, questioning whether it’s too late. More specifically, according to the report, global warming and its associated challenges could wipe out the entire defined benefits pension industry within three decades if the industry doesn’t rapidly change course.

The report concludes: “Currently actuarial models are effectively discounting to zero the probability of economic growth being limited by resource constraints. If resource constraints are significant, this means that current models will persistently understate the value of liabilities.”

Furthermore, the research notes that if economic growth is limited by resource constraints, this could be reasonably expected to significantly affect future financial and demographic outcomes. “If these future outcomes are indeed affected, then the assumptions that actuaries use should take into account these future developments” the research asserts.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“Were the global economy to go into long-term decline, the legal basis on which financial products sit could conceivably be undermined, and the sponsor employer may no longer exist to pay contributions,” the study continues. “The financial markets may also cease to exist, at least in their current form, and hence the projection would become meaningless.”

Research by consulting firm Mercer has exposed some of these risks posed by climate change and related factors. In February 2011, the firm noted that climate change could contribute as much as 10% to portfolio risk over the next 20 years. “Climate change brings fundamental implications for investment patterns, risks and rewards,” Andrew Kirton, chief investment officer at Mercer, commented in a statement at the time. “Institutional investors should be factoring long-term considerations, such as climate change, into their strategic planning.”

«