Oklahoma Retiree Files Injunction to Stop Anti-ESG Bill

The complaint claims the 2022 law not only violates the US and Oklahoma constitutions, but that that the financial costs to the state are ‘monumental.’




A retired state employee and U.S. Army veteran has filed a motion for a temporary injunction against Oklahoma Treasurer Todd Russ to prevent the implementation of the state’s Energy Discrimination Elimination Act, calling it “governmental overreach” and stating it “violates the First Amendment.” The injunction also claims the financial costs of the act are “monumental.”

Last year, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed into law the Energy Discrimination Elimination Act of 2022, which forbids state entities, including public pension funds, from doing business with companies that boycott the oil and gas industry.

The lead plaintiff filing the injunction is Donald Keenan, a U.S. Army and Air Force veteran and a former president of the Oklahoma Public Employees Association.

“As a retiree under the [Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System] system, I object to my retirement benefits being depleted because the State of Oklahoma believes that making political statements with retiree dollars is more important than taking care of retirees themselves,” Keenan said in an affidavit included with the injunction. “I bring this suit to ensure that going forward, the state and the treasurer abide by their constitutional and statutory obligations to operate the retirement systems for the ‘exclusive benefit’ of its pensioners.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The lawsuit claims the state law “violates the First Amendment for a litany of reasons, including being compelled speech, viewpoint discrimination, and content discrimination,” adding that it is “unconstitutionally vague.” The lawsuit also claims the act violates Oklahoma’s prohibition on “special laws” by creating an exception to the rule that declaratory judgment actions do not require the losing party to pay both parties’ attorney fees.

According to the lawsuit, as of August 15, the treasurer placed BlackRock, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, State Street and Climate First Bank on the state’s restricted financial company list. The complaint also cited an analysis by the city of Stillwater that found the investment firm blacklist, which barred it from using Bank of America for an infrastructure bond issue, would cost the city more than $1 million in higher interest. The complaint also cites the Oklahoma Public Employees Association’s claims that divesting from BlackRock and State Street would cost the pension system approximately $10 million.

The motion states that, “perhaps most egregiously,” the act violates the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma, which requires state-managed pension systems to operate for the “exclusive benefit” of their beneficiaries. It claims the Oklahoma state legislature attempted to “absolve the Treasurer and pension systems of their constitutional fiduciary duties” by saying they were exempt from any conflicting obligations with respect to making investments.

“It goes without saying that a statute cannot not trump the constitution, nor can a state statute contravene federal law,” the injunction states.

In a statement provided to CIO, Russ said, “The spirit and intention of the law is to protect Oklahomans and the economic base of the state. I will be happy to follow the legislature in the future.”

The injunction also argues that the Energy Discrimination Elimination Act is essentially the same as legislation passed in other states that prohibits businesses from contracting with the state if they boycott Israel, which it noted has been held as unconstitutional by five federal courts.

Related Stories:

Oklahoma Taking Names as It Seeks to Weed Out ESG Investors

House Republicans Propose 4 New Anti-ESG Bills

Barr Introduces Another Anti-ESG Bill in House

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Slammed Office Sector Won’t Show Revenue Growth Until 2025, Researchers Say

Even then, the increases will be small, a Green Street analysis concludes.



Offices are the most battered sector in U.S. commercial real estate. Their value and revenue have been shrinking since the COVID-19 pandemic. According to real estate research firm Green Street, office revenue, mostly derived from rents, will continue shrinking until 2025, and beyond that, gains will be pretty paltry.

“There will be a slight recovery in 2025—the sector will no longer be going down,” said Dylan Burzinski, Green Street’s chief analyst for the office sector, in a webinar.

A major problem confronting the office sector is that too few workers are returning to the office, with hybrid policies the norm (they go to the office for a few days, then work remotely on the others).

Occupancy has dropped 30% since 2019, the year before the pandemic, Burzinski noted. “Leasing activity is subdued, and tenants are evaluating” whether they will shrink their rental space, he added. An analytical report his team prepared concluded that “activity is unlikely to pick up soon.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

One problem is that before the pandemic, too many office buildings were constructed, so what’s called “negative absorption” is bedeviling the industry. In other words, there is an over-abundance of totally vacant or only partly occupied buildings. 

On the plus side, demand is good for newer office buildings, given their more modern amenities. “Obsolete inventory may be removed from the market over time, though this isn’t likely to materially change the overall supply landscape,” the report found. Also, very little construction is underway, and supply growth of office space should advance just 1% for years, the firm contended.

Indeed, those investing in offices via real estate investment trusts have suffered: Office REITs fell 38% in 2022 and, through November, were down almost 15% this year, according to Nareit, the trusts’ trade group. Offices have a worse share performance than all other REIT groups.

By Green Street’s reckoning, revenue per square foot (which the firm dubs M-RevPAF) will be down 4.3% this year, compared with 2022. Next year, the loss will be less, down 2%. Only in 2025 will the number turn positive, with a gain of 2.4%. After that, though, growth will be even more tepid: 1.7% in 2026 and 0.7% in 2027, the firm estimated.

Not helping the outlook is what Green Street terms “macro uncertainty,” namely questions about economic growth, inflation, interest rates and the like. Insufficient debt financing for office buildings is another headwind.

On a regional basis, there has been some growth, albeit from a low base, in revenue in New York (the nation’s largest office market), Boston and the Sun Belt, generally. The West Coast and Washington D.C. are “still pressured,” the report indicated.

Related Stories:

WeWork’s Impact Will Be a ‘Bloodbath’ for Office Space

The Woebegone Office Sector’s Bright Spot: Class A Buildings

Commercial Real Estate Faces ‘Staring Contest’

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

«