Alaska Permanent Fund Eyes Path to $100B AUM

The program, currently at $78 billion, reviews plans to increase its risk in pursuit of higher returns.



The Alaska Permanent Fund, a sovereign wealth fund supported largely by oil revenue, has a goal to reach $100 billion in assets under management, but the question is: How much risk to take to get there?

The board of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp., which manages the fund, publicly discussed at an October 30 special meeting the potential of increasing its long-term target return rate in a bid to juice up its returns. That would increase the fund’s exposure to risk, but it could also help reach the $100 billion AUM target more quickly. The board is expected to vote on the decision at its next quarterly meeting, to be held December 13 or 14. All meetings are open to the public in person, by telephone or via online webinar.

The Alaska Permanent Fund managed $81.1 billion in assets, as of the June 30 end of its fiscal year. “$100 billion should be thought of as a key milestone that we anticipate achieving in the future, but the timing of that achievement and the implied rates-of-return are subject to discussion,” CIO Marcus Frampton said via a spokesperson.

The fund presented four scenarios to explore in hopes of reaching the target AUM, all based on investment consultant Callan’s current return assumption:

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

  • To reach $100 billion in three years (fiscal 2026), the fund would need an annual return of at least 12.8%;
  • To reach the target in five years (fiscal 2028), it would need an annual return of 9.3%;
  • To achieve its target in seven years (fiscal 2030), it would need an annual return of 7.9%; and
  • To achieve $100 billion in AUM in nine years (fiscal 2032), the fund would need to achieve an annual return of 7.2%.

The fund currently has a long-term return target of 5% above the Consumer Price Index. In fiscal 2023, the CPI-based target was an 8% return, and the fund returned 5.18%.

To reach its target of $100 billion AUM by as early as 2026, the fund would have to pursue aggressive and quick returns, potentially taking riskier investments.

While the board reviews its plans ahead of a December vote, Frampton expressed his confidence in the current investment lineup and return target.

“After hearing input, APFC’s trustees elected to leave the fund’s return objective unchanged at CPI + 5%,” Frampton said. “We will continue to monitor market conditions; however, today I believe that our current asset allocation gives the Fund a good chance of achieving this return objective.”

In the APFC report shared at the special meeting, Callan identified potential asset allocations that could be made to increase returns. For example, each 1% shift from fixed income to private equity represents a four-basis-point increase in returns. Introducing about 25% of fund-level leverage at market interest rates would increase expected annual returns by around 75 bps.

Related Articles:

How Institutional Investors Are Thinking About Alts

Alaska Permanent Fund Contemplates a New Dalio-Backed Gold Allocation

Alaska Shoots for $3 Billion in Private Markets Investments Next Year

Tags: , , , ,

Will Microsoft Overtake Apple in Market Cap Sweepstakes?

The iPhone maker faces hurdles, while its rival appears to have a smoother path.


Will the king of the market cap hill be decapitated? Apple Inc. is the most richly valued public company on Earth ($2.77 trillion). But its quarterly earnings report out Thursday at market close showed a revenue downturn and leaves it vulnerable to replacement by a surging Microsoft Corp. ($2.58 trillion).

After a general market advance fueled by the Federal Reserve’s indication it might be done with tightening, both stocks were higher Thursday, although Apple fell in after-hours trading upon the release of its report. But the Apple-Microsoft cap gap has narrowed to just $185 billion. 

Both companies, founded in the 1970s, have enjoyed massive advances as the leaders of the Magnificent Seven, the cohort of Big Tech names that have dominated the market in recent years. Apple passed the $1 trillion mark in 2018, and Microsoft briefly overtook it in November 2021.

Microsoft currently boasts a momentum that Apple lacks: Bill Gates’ creation now has a large focus on two hot areas, cloud computing and artificial intelligence. Steve Jobs’s brainchild is largely hardware-oriented, with much of that concentrated in the iPhone.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Microsoft is the best of the two in revenue growth, the most prized characteristic in tech stocks. In its September-ending quarter, the company expanded revenue by 7% year-over-year (earnings increased 9%). At Apple, by contrast, revenue was down  1%, its fourth consecutive quarter of shrinkage, with earnings ahead 13%.

“Microsoft has more of what the market wants right now, and given where we stand on the pair’s growth prospects, we wouldn’t be surprised to see it overtake Apple,” David Klink, a senior equities analyst at Huntington Private Bank, told Bloomberg.

Over the past 12 months, Microsoft’s stock rose at almost double the pace of Apple, 56% versus 28%. Since the entire market slipped in mid-2023, the two companies’ trajectories have also been much different: Apple is still down 10% from its all-time high in July, while Microsoft has recovered to just a few dollars short of its zenith.

Apple has encountered major problems with China, where most iPhones are made. The demand for the devices in China is in question, as the Beijing regime is considering a ban on Apple products for government use and is investigating the firm’s largest manufacturer in the country, FoxConn, over land use and tax payments, according to media reports.

On the earnings call, Apple CEO Tim Cook emphasized higher sales of iPhones, helped by the new 15 model. The phone segment is half of the company’s revenues. “Customers are loving iPhone 15,” he said. An analyst on the call noted that the iPhone 14’s year-before sales were artificially depressed because of supply disruptions from China’s lockdown then. Meanwhile, sales of Mac computers (10% of revenue) and iPads (7%) were off.

Tags: Microsoft, Apple, tech, market cap, Magnificent Seven, revenue, earnings, China, iPhone, cloud computing, artificial intelligence

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

«