(January 10, 2014) — The best opportunities for credit investments
will be in the less liquid, more esoteric sectors in the year ahead, according to
Insight Investment.
Alex Veroude, head of credit markets at the firm, told a
briefing for investors, consultants, and the press that 2014 looked positive
over the whole sector, but it looked particularly bright for illiquid assets.
“Financials will outperform non-financials, and emerging
market corporate credit should theoretically be attractive, but that assumes
that investors are rational, and this is a sentiment-driven market,” he said. Insight
Investment expects emerging market corporates to return 9.5% in 2014.
But it’s further up the risk curve where the real
opportunities lie. CIOs have told aiCIO
they are increasingly being forced to consider more illiquid options in credit as
the search for yield intensifies.
Leandros Kalisperas, credit manager at the Universities
Superannuation Scheme (USS) said in December that he feared the low-hanging
fruit had gone, and investors would have to work harder for returns.
One sector Insight Investment highlighted was mezzanine asset-backed
securities, an asset class that gained popularity last year. Insight said the
default rates had been surprisingly low in 2013 and not that different from
investment grade loans, leading it to expect a 2014 return of 10.16%.
The phenomenon is particularly evident in Europe: research
published by Standard & Poor’s in April this year showed from mid-2007 to
the end of 2012, the default
rate for European asset-backed securities as a whole was just 1.37%. US
paper by comparison saw 16.76% default rate.
High yield loans were also more attractive in 2013, and were
expected to do well in 2014, Insight’s Veroude said. The excess return in 2013,
taken after any losses were accounted for, totalled 244 basis points (bps).
For those willing to take on the due diligence,
collateralised debt obligations (CLOs)—packages of loans put together according
to ratings—the potential upside is even more attractive. For BB-rated loans, the
default rate accounted for 86bps, meaning the break even spread was 166bps.
That meant that the overall excess returns for CLOs was 584bps.
“CLO default risks are much lower than other loan classes,”
Veroude said. “But very few investors are currently considering them. You can
tailor the risk—there’s AAA-rated CLOs if you want them.”
Veroude said take-up of CLOs had been seen in the US and
Scandinavia, although the rest of Europe and the UK had yet to invest. “The
2006 vintage of CLOs was almost exclusively held by hedge funds and private
investors, but those trades have almost gone now,” he added.
For those investors happy to use active credit managers,
even more esoteric options are being put forward for 2014 in the form of
corporate hybrids and contingent convertibles—known colloquially as CoCos.
Corporate hybrid bonds saw a surge of issuance in 2013 due
to an increasing standardisation of structures, the fact investors are
searching for more yield, and some high profile special situations, such as two
Italian telecommunications companies who used them to raise debt without
affecting their corporate rating.
Their main appeal is that they are treated by rating
agencies as part-bond, part-equity. Issuing a hybrid bond is cheaper for the
company than raising the same amount of money in the form of simultaneous bond
and equity issues, not least because the interest on bond issues is
tax-deductible for issuers, but the dividends on equity are not.
From an investors’ point of view, they can also be seen as attractive
because in theory, they have very long maturity dates. Some have notional
lifetimes of 60 years, others are perpetual, meaning that the principal is
never repaid and the bond keeps paying interest forever.
Insight’s Head of Credit Analysis David Averre told the
briefing: “€15 billion worth of supply is due this year. Don’t buy it if you
wouldn’t by senior debt on fundamental grounds, and you must have the resources
available to analyse the bonds properly.
“The main risk is extension risk, i.e. that they don’t call
the bond. Another key risk is the option for the issuer too call bonds back if
the credit rating agencies’ methodology changes, or there’s a change in tax and
accounting rules. A change of ownership can [affect their decision] too. There’s
also very little chance of recovery if the company goes into default.”
CoCos meanwhile saw $17 billion issued in 2013, and are
expected to see issuance rise to between $125 billion and $140 billion over the
next three years. These bonds are bought on the understanding that the investor
can convert them into equity once the company’s stock price has hit a “strike”
point, which is usually a higher price than a traditional convertible bond.
Swiss banks are currently issuing CoCos which are deemed to
be extremely attractive, but there were warnings around this investment too:
these are not viable for buy and hold investors.
In September 2013, aiCIO
spoke to consultants how their clients viewed illiquid credit options such
as those mentioned above, and it appears there is a distinct lack of appetite
in the main.
Pete Drewienkiewicz, head of manager research at Redington, said
he hadn’t seen significant interest in ABSs since the spreads tightened in 2012.
“Although we believe that spreads in many areas of the ABS
market still overcompensate for default risk, the spreads available on
investment-grade ABS no longer meet our clients’ strategic needs,” he said.
“Many clients still have concerns over certain areas of the
ABS space, particularly around double securitisations. But we have had clients
investing in the space since 2009 who have experience super-normal returns as a
result of their early allocation to the asset class.”
Aon Hewitt Partner Tim Giles meanwhile said the interest
level from his clients was decidedly mixed. While some were still nervous
because of the dramatic falls ABS saw during the beginning of the financial
crisis, others were more concerned with obtaining better yields, and were able
to ride out liquidity problems if they arise.
“You need to make sure you’ve got a good handle on the
quality of the assets and how it might suffer if a market crisis hits,” Giles
said.
“Will you see great returns from the sector in the future?
Probably not, but it’s still got a place in the portfolio, as long as you can
cope with the possible lack of liquidity.”
Related Content: Is
the ABS Market Making a Comeback? and Is
Credit the Saviour of Fixed Income… and if Not, What Is?