CDPQ Loses 7.9% in First Half, Writes Off Crypto Loss

Canada’s second largest pension is looking at legal options over failed $150 million crypto investment.



Canadian pension fund Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec reported that its investment portfolio is down 7.9%, or C$33.6 billion ($26 billion) for the first half of the year, but remains well ahead of its benchmark portfolio, which lost 10.5% in that time. As of June 30, the pension fund had net assets of C$392 billion, according to a news release.

“The first six months of the year were very challenging. The mix of factors we faced had not been witnessed in several decades,” CDPQ President and CEO Charles Emond said in a statement. “For the past two years, we’ve been working in an environment of extremes characterized by particularly fast and pronounced changes. These unusual and unstable conditions will persist for some time.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Canada’s second largest pension fund reported five- and 10-year annualized returns of 6.1% and 8.3%, respectively, above its benchmark’s returns of 5.3% and 7.3%, respectively, over the same time periods. The C$28.2 billion decrease in net assets during the first half was made up of the C$33.6 billion investment loss and C$5.4 billion in net deposits.

The pension fund’s real asset investments, which include the real estate and infrastructure portfolios, returned 7.9% through the end of June, easily beating its benchmark portfolio’s return of 2.4%. The news release credits the performance to a strong showing from infrastructure assets and the logistics real estate segment, but says the asset class continues to be limited by the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on shopping centers and office buildings.

Real estate investments returned 10.2%, but fell short of its benchmark portfolio’s 11.4% return. Over five years, the portfolio had an annualized return of 2.9%, well below the benchmark portfolio’s 6.7% return during that time, which the release attributes to the fund’s high weighting in shopping centers.

The infrastructure portfolio earned 5.8%, a sharp contrast from its benchmark portfolio, which lost 5.5% during the first half. Over five years, the asset class posted a 9.6% return, compared with 6.3% for its benchmark portfolio, which according to the release represents C$6.5 billion in added value. The release credits the strong performance to “a careful selection of assets, diligent post-investment asset management and good sectoral diversification,” including in renewable energy, telecommunications and transportation.

The equities asset class, which includes the equity markets and private equity portfolios, lost 10.6% through the end of June; however, this was better than its benchmark portfolio’s loss of 11.9%. Over five years, the asset class had an annualized return of 9.8%, compared with 8.6% for the benchmark portfolio, representing C$10 billion in added value.

As a result of the market downturn, the equity markets portfolio recorded a loss of 16.0% for the first six months, but outperformed its benchmark, which lost 17.2%. The portfolio had a five-year annualized return of 5.5%, while its benchmark portfolio returned 6.0% in that time. The release attributes the underperformance to the fund’s significant underexposure to certain technology giants.

The private equity portfolio was also down for the first half of the year, losing 2.4%, but beating its benchmark portfolio’s loss of 4.1%. Over five years, the portfolio produced an annualized return of 17.6%, while its benchmark portfolio earned 12.4% in that time.

Emond also said in an earnings call that CDPQ is exploring its legal options regarding a recently revealed loss of $150 million from an investment in crypto lending firm Celsius, which filed for bankruptcy last month.

“We will preserve our rights and explore legal options,” Emond said on the conference call. “We were interested in seizing the potential of blockchain technology, but clearly things did not go as expected.”

Related Stories:

Canada’s CDPQ Returns 13.5% in 2021

CDPQ Unveils Climate Strategy to Reach ‘Net Zero’ by 2050

Blackstone Invests $3 Billion in CDPQ-Owned Invenergy Renewables

Tags: , , , , ,

ECB: Most European Banks Don’t Measure Climate Risk

Most lenders fail to consider possible environmental threats when making loans, a central bank study says.   



Europe’s banks are not ready to deal with climate catastrophes, according to the continent’s central bank—and that could lead to losses of at least $71 billion for the eurozone’s largest lenders.

 

The economic ripple effect would be considerable, affecting businesses far and wide, the European Central Bank’s climate stress test concluded after a survey of 104 institutions in the European Union. North American pension funds and other asset allocators have considerable investments in Europe, which is also a major trading partner for the U.S. and Canada.

 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The study comes as Europe endures a summer of extreme heat, scant rainfall and wildfires, a situation made worse by climbing energy prices and looming natural gas shortages stemming from the Russia-Ukraine war.

The ECB study reveals that some 60% of banks lack a climate risk stress-testing program. Further, 80% of them don’t factor in climate risk when making loans. In addition, just under two-thirds of banks’ earnings from nonfinancial corporate customers is provided by greenhouse-gas-heavy industries.

“Euro area banks must urgently step up efforts to measure and manage climate risk, closing the current data gaps and adopting good practices that are already present in the sector,” the ECB’s chief supervisor, Andrea Enria, said in a statement.

 

Europe has been far more ambitious in its climate regulation and oversight than has the U.S. For instance, earlier this year, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority conducted a stress test to gauge the resilience of the European Union’s pension funds during a climate emergency.

 

U.S. banks are further behind their European counterparts in “climate reporting and preparation” at financial institutions, Moody’s Analytics warned in a study last year.

 

In the U.S., S&P Global Ratings has begun to measure climate risk exposure when making credit ratings. Meanwhile, President Joe Biden has pledged to increase efforts to curb greenhouse gases, despite a recent Supreme Court decision limiting his authority to do that. His recently enacted climate and health care bill provides billions to promote a greener economy.

 

Related Stories:

Climate Stress Tests Help Gauge Financial Sector Risk Exposure

European Pension Regulator Launches Climate Risk Stress Test for 2022

UK Pension Plans Lag Behind in Climate Change Plans

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

«